Saturday, December 17, 2011

Archaeology: What's Hot Now: Gobekli Tepe

Archaeology: What's Hot Now
These articles that had the largest increase in popularity over the last week // via fulltextrssfeed.com
Gobekli Tepe
Dec 17th 2011, 11:01

Göbekli Tepe was first discovered by Peter Benedict during the Joint Istanbul-Chicago Survey of the 1960s, although he did not recognize its complexity or importance. In 1994, Klaus Schmidt now of the German Archaeological Institute (DAI) began excavations and the rest is history. Since that time, extensive excavations have been conducted by the members of the Museum of Sanliurfa and the DAI.

This photo essay was written as context for Charles Mann's feature article in the June 2011 issue of National Geographic, and the wonderful photography of Vincent J. Musi. Available on news stands on May 30, 2011, the issue includes far more photographs and Mann's article, which includes an interview with excavator Klaus Schmidt.

Sources

Banning EB. 2011. So Fair a House: Göbekli Tepe and the Identification of Temples in the Pre-Pottery Neolithic of the Near East. Current Anthropology 52(5):619-660.

Hauptmann H. 1999. The Urfa Region. In: Ordogon N, editor. Neolithic in Turkey. Istanbul: Arkeolojo ve Sanat Yay. p 65-86.

Kornienko TV. 2009. Notes On The Cult Buildings Of Northern Mesopotamia In The Aceramic Neolithic Period. Journal of Near Eastern Studies 68(2):81-101.

Neef R. 2003. Overlooking the Steppe-Forest: A preliminary report on the botanical remains from Early Neolithic Göbekli Tepe (Southeastern Turkey). Neo-Lithics 2:13-16.

Peters J, and Schmidt K. 2004. Animals in the symbolic world of Pre-Pottery Neolithic Göbekli Tepe, south-eastern Turkey: a preliminary assessment. Anthropzoologica 39(1):179-218.

Pustovoytov K, and Taubald H. 2003. Stable Carbon and Oxygen Isotope Composition of Pedogenic Carbonate at Göbekli Tepe (Southeastern Turkey) and Its Potential for Reconstructing Late Quaternary Paleoenvironments in Upper Mesopotamia. Neo-Lithics 2:25-32.

Schmidt K. 2000. Göbekli Tepe, Southeastern Turkey. A Preliminary Report on the 1995-1999 Excavations. Paleorient 26(1):45-54.

Schmidt K. 2003. The 2003 Campaign at Göbekli Tepe (Southeastern Turkey). Neo-Lithics 2:3-8.

You are receiving this email because you subscribed to this feed at blogtrottr.com.
If you no longer wish to receive these emails, you can unsubscribe from this feed, or manage all your subscriptions

Archaeology: What's Hot Now: Craft Specialization

Archaeology: What's Hot Now
These articles that had the largest increase in popularity over the last week // via fulltextrssfeed.com
Craft Specialization
Dec 17th 2011, 11:01

Craft specialization is what archaeologists call the assignment of specific tasks to specific people or subsets of people in a community. An agricultural community might have had specialists who made pots or knapped flints or tended crops or stayed in touch with the gods or conducted burial ceremonies. Craft specialization allows a community to get large projects completedâ€"wars fought, pyramids builtâ€"and yet still get the day-to-day operations of the community done as well.

How Does Craft Specialization Develop?

Archaeologists generally believe that hunter-gatherer societies were/are primarily egalitarian, in that most everyone did most everything. A recent study on modern hunter-gatherers suggests that even though a select portion of the community group goes out to do the hunting for the whole (i.e., what you would imagine would be hunting specialists), when they return, they pass the knowledge on, so that everyone in the community understands how to hunt. Makes senseâ€"should something happen to the hunters, unless the hunting process is understood by everyone, the community starves. In this way, knowledge is shared by everyone in the community and no one is indispensable.

But, as a society grows in population and complexity, at some point certain kinds of tasks became overly time-consuming, and, theoretically anyway, someone who is particularly skilled at a task gets selected to do that task for his or her family group, clan, or community. For example, someone who is good at making spearpoints or pots is selected, in some process unknown to us, to dedicate their time to the production of these items.

Why is Craft Specialization a "Keystone" to Complexity?

Craft specialization is also part of the process that archaeologists believe may kickstart societal complexity.

  1. First, someone who spends their time making pots may not be able to spend time producing food for her family. Everybody needs pots, and at the same time the potter must eat; perhaps a system of barter becomes necessary to make it possible for the craft specialist to continue.
  2. Secondly, specialized information must be passed on in some way, and generally protected. Specialized information requires an educational process of some kind, whether the process is simple apprenticeships or more formal schools.
  3. Finally, since not every one does exactly the same work or has the same lifeways, ranking or class systems might develop out of such a situation. Specialists may become of higher rank or lower rank to the rest of the population; specialists may even become society leaders.

Identifying Craft Specialization Archaeologically

Archaeologically, evidence of craft specialists is suggested by patterningâ€"by the presence of differential concentrations of certain types of artifacts in certain sections of communities. For example, in a given community, the archaeological ruins of the residence or workshop of a shell tool specialist might contain most of the broken and worked shell fragments found in the whole village. Other houses in the village might have only one or two complete shell tools.

Identification of the work of craft specialists is sometimes suggested by archaeologists from a perceived similarity in a certain class of artifacts. So, if ceramic vessels found in a community are pretty much the same size, with the same or similar decorations or design details, that may be evidence that they were all made by the same small number of individualsâ€"craft specialists. Craft specialization is thus a precursor to mass production.

Some Recent Examples of Craft Specialization

  • Cathy Costin's research using examinations of design elements to identify how craft specialization worked among Inka groups in 15th and 16th century AD Peru [Costin, Cathy L. and Melissa B. Hagstrum 1995 Standardization, labor investment, skill, and the organization of ceramic production in late prehispanic highland Peru. American Antiquity 60(4):619-639.]
  • Kathy Schick and Nicholas Toth of Indiana University continue experimental replication of craft technology at the Stone Age Institute.
  • Kazuo Aoyama discusses the Aguateca site in Guatemala, where an abrupt attack of the Classic Maya center preserved evidence of specialized bone or shell working.

Sources on Craft Specialization

This glossary entry is a part of the Guide to the Characteristics of Ancient Civilizations, and part of the Dictionary of Archaeology. Any mistakes are the responsibility of Kris Hirst.

On page two, I've assembled a bibliography for those who wish to probe farther.

You are receiving this email because you subscribed to this feed at blogtrottr.com.
If you no longer wish to receive these emails, you can unsubscribe from this feed, or manage all your subscriptions

Friday, December 16, 2011

Archaeology: Roads of the Khmer Empire

Archaeology
Get the latest headlines from the Archaeology GuideSite. // via fulltextrssfeed.com
Roads of the Khmer Empire
Dec 16th 2011, 10:22

I've been reading recently about the Angkor Civilization, a.k.a. the Khmer Empire, which included most of what is today Cambodia and Thailand during the Middle Ages (ca 800-1300 AD). The size and stretch of the empire has often forced nearly a century of inventive scholars to use a broad based settlement pattern type study: the most recent of which is focused on the road system.

Approach Road to Banteay Srei Temple
Approach Road to the Banteay Srei Temple, photo by Anandajoti

This photo is of an approach road to the temple of Banteay Srei, and it hints at the construction process of Khmer roadways. While the roads themselves were fairly straight, flat and unpaved, there were numerous temples and resthouses and bridges and reservoirs and other accoutrements for the travelers between the capital city of Angkor and the cities of Phimai, Vat Phu, Preah Khan, Sambor Prei Kuk and Sdok Kaka Thom, in an interconnected web of roads some 1,000 kilometers (600 miles) in length.

You are receiving this email because you subscribed to this feed at blogtrottr.com.
If you no longer wish to receive these emails, you can unsubscribe from this feed, or manage all your subscriptions

Archaeology: What's Hot Now: Papyrus

Archaeology: What's Hot Now
These articles that had the largest increase in popularity over the last week // via fulltextrssfeed.com
Papyrus
Dec 16th 2011, 11:01

Papyrus (Cyperus papyrus L.) is a freshwater reed which belongs to the Cyperaceae family of sedges. It has no leaves, but typically grows to a height of between 1.5-4 meters (5-13 feet), and when fully grown is topped with a bushy cluster of fine thread-like strands which end in tiny flowers. Its stem is triangular in cross-section; the stem is five to eight centimeters (2-8 inches) wide at the base and tapers to a point at the top. The interior of the stem, called pith or parenchyma, is a cream-colored fibrous mass with a spongy texture of honey-combed cells and parallel woody or ligneous fibers.

Papyrus grows today in isolated swamps and wetlands throughout the arid parts of the Mediterranean. During the Early Bronze Age of about four thousand years ago, it was deliberately cultivated within the floodplains of the Nile, Euphrates and Tigris rivers, providing a variety of uses to the Egyptian and Mesopoamian civilizations. Papyrus was never truly domesticated: but it was an important economic piece of these cultures, and cultivation of papyrus required management, including bans on burning, rotational harvesting, seasonal harvesting and control of other intrusive plants.

Using Papyrus

Papyrus is probably best known for its use by various Bronze Age societies for the production of paper, but also other products, such as boats, food, sails, mattresses, mats, blankets, rope, sandals and baskets. In our modern day, people use it to build houses, as fuel for fire, fodder for animals, sleeping mats and roofing and as medication. In ecological terms, papyrus is studied today for its ability to trap sediments and keep pollutants from entering water bodies in wetlands.

The oldest written papyrus comes from Egypt, about 2400 BC. Beginning about the fourth century BC, papyrus use spread into the Greco-Roman world, and it only declined after about the 7th century AD, when parchment, made from treated animal skin, and rag paper, developed in China and brought to the Mediterranean via the extensive Arabic trading network, became readily available. Rag paper is the precursor of our modern papers; but the word paper comes direct to us from papyrus.

Papyrus rolls and fragments have been found in caves, tombs, middens, and mummy casings: essentially, it is preserved in micro-climates where low temperatures and humidity are combined with a relative lack of insect life. Most surviving papyri are written in Greek, but a large number have been found in Latin, Egyptian, Aramaic, Persian, and Arabic. An enormous collection of about 200,000 papyri covering nearly 1,000 years were recovered from the Oxyrhynchus site in Egypt, where a veritable library of Egyptian, Hellenistic and Roman writings were discovered in a dump.

Making Papyrus Paper

In the first century AD, the Roman writer Pliny the Elder described how to make paper, albeit in fairly vague terms. Archaeological investigations through the latter part of the last century have revealed additional details. The process begins with harvesting the thickest part of the papyrus stem into segments of between 20-30 centimeters (7-12 inches). The outer rind is peeled off, and the pith is cut into strips. These strips are laid out side by side; a second layer is stacked on top of the first, at right angles from the first layer. Water (from the Nile, says Pliny) was added, and the whole mass was beaten or pressed to form a single sheet. It is possible that salts and aluminum in Nile water sediments combined with the natural gums in papyrus acted as an adhesive. The sheet was then allowed to dry. The individual sheets of paper were then joined together into rolls using a starch-based paste to attach overlying edges, and the whole surface was prepared for writing by a wash of egg, gum and/or milk. A typical roll took about 20 sheets.

In some cases, the paper maker peeled out the pith with a needle, producing large flat sheets which could be then pressed together. This method had to be reinforced with the strip method to create a regular size and form.

Modern Studies of Papyrus

In 2004, scholars (Franceschi et al.) described using scanning electron microscopy and optical microscropy to identify evidence of the different manufacturing processes used by Egyptians and Greco-Romans. They found that thermal curves could be used to determine the amount of cellulose and lignin present in a papyrus document, variations which result from different processing methods.

The POxy Project is a research project investigating the translation and study of the papyri from Oxyrhynchus. The preservation of the papyri, enhanced by the latest technology, has allowed researchers to identify new texts from a number of ancient writers; the study of the work has also led to new techniques to obtain reasonable images from which to read the texts. There are so many papryi in the collections required transcription that during the summer of 2011, the University of Oxford published the Ancient Lives website, where the Oxyrhychus texts are online and you can help transcribe them.

Sources

This glossary entry is a part of the guide to Ancient Writing, and the Dictionary of Archaeology.

Franceschi E, Luciano G, Carosi F, Cornara L, and Montanari C. 2004. Thermal and microscope analysis as a tool in the characterisation of ancient papyri. Thermochimica Acta 418(1-2):39-45.

Leach B. 2009. Papyrus Manufacture. In: Wendrich W, editor. UCLA Encylopedia of Egyptology. Los Angeles: University of California at Los Angeles. Open Access.

Marota I, Basile C, Ubaldi M, and Rollo F. 2002. DNA decay rate in papyri and human remains from Egyptian archaeological sites. American Journal of Physical Anthropology 117(4):310-318.

Shepherd WH. 2008. The preservation and conservation of papyri. Unpublished paper.

Terer T, Muasya AM, Dahdouh-Guebas F, Ndiritu GG, and Triest L. 2012. Integrating local ecological knowledge and management practices of an isolated semi-arid papyrus swamp (Loboi, Kenya) into a wider conservation framework. Journal of Environmental Management 93(1):71-84.

You are receiving this email because you subscribed to this feed at blogtrottr.com.
If you no longer wish to receive these emails, you can unsubscribe from this feed, or manage all your subscriptions

Archaeology: What's Hot Now: Broad Spectrum Revolution

Archaeology: What's Hot Now
These articles that had the largest increase in popularity over the last week // via fulltextrssfeed.com
Broad Spectrum Revolution
Dec 16th 2011, 11:01

The Broad Spectrum Revolution (sometimes abbreviated BSR) refers to a proposed subsistence shift at the end of the last Ice Age (ca 12,000-8,000 years ago). People who had been primarily hunters of large-bodied terrestrial mammals broadened their dietary bases to include small animals and plants, becoming hunter-gatherers.

Broad Spectrum Revolution and Population Growth

The broader resource base, so the theory goes, led to increased population density in some places, and that in turn led to social complexity: the Neolithic Revolution.

The BSR was proposed by Kent Flannery in 1969, building on work by Lewis Binford. The major change in the theory today is that it appears that the broadening of resource base began earlier, during the Upper Paleolithic, evidenced by use of grains and small birds at sites such as Ohalo II in Israel and Xiaojingshan in China.

Sources

Allaby, Robin G., Dorian Q. Fuller, and Terence A. Brown 2008 The genetic expectations of a protracted model for the origins of domesticated crops. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 105 (37):13982-13986.

Abbo, Shahal, et al. 2008 Wild lentil and chickpea harvest in Israel: bearing on the origins of Near Eastern farming. Journal of Archaeological Science 35(12):3172-3177.

Stiner, Mary C. 2001 Thirty years on the "Broad Spectrum Revolution" and paleolithic demography. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 98(13):6993-6996.

You are receiving this email because you subscribed to this feed at blogtrottr.com.
If you no longer wish to receive these emails, you can unsubscribe from this feed, or manage all your subscriptions

Archaeology: What's Hot Now: Pyramids of Egypt

Archaeology: What's Hot Now
These articles that had the largest increase in popularity over the last week // via fulltextrssfeed.com
Pyramids of Egypt
Dec 16th 2011, 11:01

The pyramids in Egypt are among the most amazing architectural monuments in the world, and the differences between them are as fascinating as their similarities.

The Step Pyramid

The Step Pyramid of the Old Kingdom pharaoh Djoser [ruled about 2668-2649 BC] was the very first of any of the pyramids built in Egypt, built during the Old Kingdom's 3rd Dynasty.

Great Pyramid or Khufu's Pyramid

The Great Pyramid is the largest and best known of the three Old Kingdom pyramids located on the Giza Plateau in Egypt, built during the reign of the Pharaoh Khufu between 2589 and 2566 BC.

Khafre's Pyramid

Khafre's Pyramid at GizaAndrea De Stefani
Khafre's pyramid on the Giza Plateau was built between 2558 and 2532 BC, the second after Khufu's and before Menkaure's pyramids.

Menkaure's Pyramid

The last pyramid built at the Giza Plateau was constructed during the fourth dynasty of the Old Kingdom Egypt, to hold the remains of the pharaoh Menkaure (also spelled Menkare).

The Bent Pyramid

The Bent Pyramid is one of the Old Kingdom Pyramids at Giza, Egypt; built in the 4th Dynasty, 2680-2565 B.C. for the 4th dynasty pharaoh, Sneferu.

Meidum Pyramid

Meidum (also spelled Maidum) is an Old Kingdom pyramid, begun during the 3rd dynasty by Huni, and completed during the 4th Dynasty (2613-2494 BC) by his son Sneferu (or Snofru)

You are receiving this email because you subscribed to this feed at blogtrottr.com.
If you no longer wish to receive these emails, you can unsubscribe from this feed, or manage all your subscriptions

Thursday, December 15, 2011

Archaeology: What's Hot Now: Ropes and Cables found at Wadi Murabba'at

Archaeology: What's Hot Now
These articles that had the largest increase in popularity over the last week // via fulltextrssfeed.com
Ropes and Cables found at Wadi Murabba'at
Dec 15th 2011, 11:01

The archaeological site of Wadi Murabba'at is located about 11 miles from Qumran, also in the northern Judean desert near the shores of the Dead Sea. In three caves at Murabba'at were discovered more scrolls, including letters which report the events related to the Bar Kokhba revolt, and mention the leader of the uprising, Shimon Ben Kosiba. This revolt, also called the Second Jewish Revolt against the Romans, took place CE 132-35. Additional scrolls dating to the first centuries BCE and CE have been found at Masada (which was famously stormed by the Romans early in CE 74) and the Cave of the Letters, which include the personal documents of a young woman named Babatha, who hid them from the Romans in CE 132.

Primary Source

For More Information

You are receiving this email because you subscribed to this feed at blogtrottr.com.
If you no longer wish to receive these emails, you can unsubscribe from this feed, or manage all your subscriptions

Archaeology: What's Hot Now: Leather Sandals, Qumran Caves

Archaeology: What's Hot Now
These articles that had the largest increase in popularity over the last week // via fulltextrssfeed.com
Leather Sandals, Qumran Caves
Dec 15th 2011, 11:01

Historical information about the Essene sect (the likely writers of the scrolls) is known not simply from the scrolls themselves. Information about clothing and lifeways is also derived from reports from ancient writers such as Josephus and Philo of Athens. The men at Qumran probably wore plain robes of undyed linen that they shared communally.

Evidence for the presence of women at Qumran is scarce; a very small minority of the 1100 people buried in the cemetery at Qumran are women; and the scrolls only rarely mention women at all. One possibility is that the sectarian group was primarily a celibate group of men.

Primary Source

For More Information

You are receiving this email because you subscribed to this feed at blogtrottr.com.
If you no longer wish to receive these emails, you can unsubscribe from this feed, or manage all your subscriptions

Archaeology: What's Hot Now: Dates and Pits found in Qumran Caves

Archaeology: What's Hot Now
These articles that had the largest increase in popularity over the last week // via fulltextrssfeed.com
Dates and Pits found in Qumran Caves
Dec 15th 2011, 11:01

Dates were an important part of daily diet to anyone living in the dry desert regions near the Dead Sea. Carbonized dates were discovered in association with a date press located on the outskirts of Qumran by Israeli archaeologist Yitzhak Magen in 1993. This structure is an interesting find, because the available water at Qumran would not have supported a date orchard; the nearest reasonable source would be at the brackish springs of Ein Feshkha, two miles south of Qumran. The inhabitants of Qumran would have also raised herds of sheep, goats and cattle, and possibly mined salt and bitumen from the highly saline and fish-less waters of the Dead Sea.

Primary Source

For More Information

You are receiving this email because you subscribed to this feed at blogtrottr.com.
If you no longer wish to receive these emails, you can unsubscribe from this feed, or manage all your subscriptions

Archaeology: What's Hot Now: Reindeer Herders

Archaeology: What's Hot Now
These articles that had the largest increase in popularity over the last week // via fulltextrssfeed.com
Reindeer Herders
Dec 15th 2011, 11:01

Sledge and Reindeer, Nenets Encampment,

Dogs, Sledges and Reindeer Herd, Nenets Herders, Yamal, Siberia

Dogs, Sledges and Reindeer Herd, Nenets Herders, Yamal, Siberia

Photo credit © Andrei Kilmov
This photograph shows a closeup of the sledges used by the Nenets nomadic reindeer herders. Sledges such as these have been used by archaeologists to identify the earliest evidence of reindeer domestication.

Additional Sources

You are receiving this email because you subscribed to this feed at blogtrottr.com.
If you no longer wish to receive these emails, you can unsubscribe from this feed, or manage all your subscriptions

Wednesday, December 14, 2011

Archaeology: Egyptian Medicine

Archaeology
Get the latest headlines from the Archaeology GuideSite. // via fulltextrssfeed.com
Egyptian Medicine
Dec 14th 2011, 08:50

The ancient Egyptians were pioneers in the field of medicine, as I discovered when I was poking around in among the papyrus swamp.

Edwin Smith Surgical Papyrus
A page from the Edwin Smith Surgical Papyrus, dated ca. 1550 BC. Photo by Jeff Dahl

This image is a page from the Edwin Smith Surgical Papyrus, a medical training document that includes 48 cases of battlefield injuries and how to treat them. Skull fractures, puncture wounds, spinal injuries, all of these are listed with diagnoses, recommended treatment and order of triage: which can be treated, which needs work to heal, which cannot be healed. Along with the Ebers Papyrus, these two manuscripts from the 16th century BC show us just how advanced a medical community there was.

Read more about Egyptian Medicine

You are receiving this email because you subscribed to this feed at blogtrottr.com.
If you no longer wish to receive these emails, you can unsubscribe from this feed, or manage all your subscriptions

Archaeology: What's Hot Now: Reindeer Domestication

Archaeology: What's Hot Now
These articles that had the largest increase in popularity over the last week // via fulltextrssfeed.com
Reindeer Domestication
Dec 14th 2011, 11:01

Reindeer (Rangifer tarandus, also called caribou in North America), were the last animal domesticated by humans. There are currently ~2.5 million domesticated reindeer located in nine countries, and occupying some 100,000 people to tend them: that is approximately 50% of the total population of reindeer in the world.

A recent study on reindeer mtDNA (Røed et al. 2008) identified at least two separate and apparently independent reindeer domestication events, in eastern Russia and Fenno-Scandia (Norway, Sweden and Finland). Substantial interbreeding of wild and domestic animals in the past obscures DNA differentiation, but even so, the data continue to support at least two or three independent domestication events, probably within the past two or three thousand years.

Social differences between reindeer populations show that domestic reindeer have an earlier breeding season, are smaller and have a less-strong urge to migrate than their wild relatives. While there are multiple subspecies (R. t. tarandus and R. t. fennicus), they are not necessarily divided between domestic and wild animals, the result of continued interbreeding between domesticated and wild animals, and the likelihood that domestication took place relatively recently.

Reindeer Hunting Techniques

Reindeer live in cold climates, and they feed mostly on grass and lichen. During the fall season, their bodies are fat and strong, and their fur is quite thick. The prime time for hunting reindeer, then, would be in the fall, when hunters could collect the best meat, strongest bones and sinews, and thickest fur, to help their families survive the long winters.

Archaeological evidence of ancient human predation on reindeer include amulets, rock art and effigies, reindeer bone and antler and hunting corrals. Reindeer bone has been recovered from the French sites of Combe Grenal and Vergisson, suggesting that reindeer were hunted at least as long ago as 45,000 years.

Two large mass hunting facilities, similar in design to desert kites, have been recorded in the Varanger peninsula of far northern Norway. These consist of a circular enclosure or pit with a pair of rock lines leading outward in a V-shape arrangement. Hunters would drive the animals into the wide end of the V and then down into the corral, where the reindeer would be slaughtered en masse or kept for a period of time. Rock art panels in the Alta fjord of northern Norway depict such corrals with reindeer and hunters, substantiating the interpretation of the Varanger kites as hunting corrals. Pitfall systems are believed by scholars to have been used beginning in the late Mesolithic (ca. 7000 BP), and the Alta fjord rock art depictions date to approximately the same time, ~4700â€"4200 cal BC.

Mass kills driving reindeer into a lake along two parallel fences built of stone cairns and poles have been found at four sites in southern Norway, used during the second half of the 13th century AD; and mass kills conducted this way are recorded in European history as late as the 17th century.

Reindeer Domestication

Scholars believe, for the most part, that it is unlikely that humans successfully controlled much of reindeer behavior or affected any morphological changes in reindeer until about 3000 years ago or so. It's unlikely, rather than certain, for a number of reasons, not the least because there is no archaeological site which shows evidence for the domestication of reindeer, at least as yet. If they exist, the sites would be located in the Eurasian arctic, and there has been little excavation there to date.

Ethnographic Data

Ethnographic evidence from pastoral peoples of the Eurasian arctic and subarctic (such as the Sayan, Nenets, Sami and Tungus) exploited (and still do) the reindeer for meat, milk, riding, and pack transport. Reindeer saddles used by ethnographic Sayan appear to be derived from horse saddles of the Mongolian steppes; those used by Tungus are derived from Turkic cultures on the Altai steppe. Sledges, or sleds drawn by draft animals, also have attributes that appear to be adapted from those used with cattle or horses. These contacts are estimated to have occurred no longer ago than about 1000 BC. However, evidence for the use of sledges has been identified as long ago as the Mesolithic in the Baltic Sea basin of northern Europe, some 8000 years ago; they don't seem to have been used with reindeer until much later.

Why Weren't Reindeer Domesticated Earlier?

Why reindeer were domesticated so late is speculation, but some scholars believe that it may relate to the docile nature of reindeer. As wild adults reindeer are willing to be milked and stay close to human settlements, but at the same time they are also extremely independent, and don't need to be fed or housed by humans. In this respect, the notion that domestication involves changes in behavior both in the animal and the human is upheld.

Although some scholars have argued that reindeer were kept as domestic herds by hunter-gatherers beginning the late Pleistocene, a recent study of reindeer bones dated from 130,000 to 10,000 years ago (Weinstock 2000) showed no morphological changes in reindeer skeletal material at all over that period. Further, reindeer are still not found outside their native habitats; both of these would be physical marks of domestication.

Sources

Because there is so little concrete data to date, the domestication of reindeer is a complex issue; see the sources for more information, in particular Ingold pp. 95-143.

This article is part of the Guide to the History of Animal Domestication.

Bleed, P. 2006 Living in the human niche. Evolutionary Archaeology 15:8-10.

Helskog K, and Indrelid S. 2011. Humans and reindeer. Quaternary International 238(1-2):1-3.

Helskog K. 2011. Reindeer corrals 4700-4200 BC: Myth or reality? Quaternary International 238(1-2):25-34.

Indrelid S, and Hufthammer AK. 2011. Medieval mass trapping of reindeer at the Hardangervidda mountain plateau, South Norway. Quaternary International 238(1-2):44-54.

Ingold, T. 1980. Hunters, pastoralists, and ranchers: Reindeer economics and their transformations. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

Kuntz D, and Costamagno S. 2011. Relationships between reindeer and man in southwestern France during the Magdalenian. Quaternary International 238(1-2):12-24.

Kwon, H. 1998 The saddle and the sledge: Hunting as comparative narrative in Siberia and beyond. Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute 41:15-127.

Laufer, B. 1917. The reindeer and its domestication. Memoir 4, American Anthropological Association, Lancaster PA.

Næss M, Bårdsen B-J, Pedersen E, and Tveraa T. 2011. Pastoral Herding Strategies and Governmental Management Objectives: Predation Compensation as a Risk Buffering Strategy in the Saami Reindeer Husbandry. Human Ecology 39(4):489-508.

Røed KH, Flagstad Ø, Bjørnstad G, and Hufthammer AK. 2011. Elucidating the ancestry of domestic reindeer from ancient DNA approaches. Quaternary International 238(1-2):83-88.

Røed KH, Flagstad Ø, Nieminen M, Holand Ø, Dwyer MJ, Røv N, and Vilà C. 2008. Genetic analyses reveal independent domestication origins of Eurasian reindeer. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences 275(1645):1849-1855.

van Kolfschoten T, van der Jagt I, Beeren Z, Argiti V, van der Leije J, van Essen H, Busschers FS, Stoel P, and van der Plicht H. 2011. A remarkable collection of Late Pleistocene reindeer (Rangifer tarandus) remains from Woerden (The Netherlands). Quaternary International 238(1-2):4-11.

Weinstock, J. 2000. Late Pleistocene reindeer populations in Middle and Western Europe: An osteometrical study of Rangifer tarandus. Mo Vince Verlag, Tübingen.

White, R. 1999. Husbandry and Herd Control in the Upper Paleolithic: A Critical Review of the Evidence. Current Anthropology 30:609-632

Zvelebil M. 2006. Mobility, contact, and exchange in the Baltic Sea basin 6000â€"2000 BC. Journal of Anthropological Archaeology 25(2):178-192.

Thanks to Jeannine Davis-Kimball for much-needed advice about this issue, on an earlier version of this article. Any mistakes are the responsibility of Kris Hirst.

You are receiving this email because you subscribed to this feed at blogtrottr.com.
If you no longer wish to receive these emails, you can unsubscribe from this feed, or manage all your subscriptions

Archaeology: What's Hot Now: Ice Free Corridor

Archaeology: What's Hot Now
These articles that had the largest increase in popularity over the last week // via fulltextrssfeed.com
Ice Free Corridor
Dec 14th 2011, 11:01

The so-called Ice Free Corridor hypothesis has been the accepted human colonization route for the American continents since at least the 1930s. This route was postulated by archaeologists looking for a way by which humans could have entered North America during the late Wisconsinan ice age. Essentially, the hypothesis suggested that Clovis culture hunters arrived in North America chasing after megafauna (mammoth and bison) through a corridor between the ice slabs. The corridor was thought to have crossed what is now the provinces of Alberta and eastern British Columbia, between the Laurentide and Cordilleran ice masses.

Questioning the Ice Free Corridor

In the early 1980s, modern vertebrate paleontology and geology was applied to the question. Studies showed that various portions of the 'corridor' were blocked by ice from between 30,000 to at least 11,500 BP (i.e., during and for a long while after the Last Glacial Maximum). Since sites in Alberta are less than 11,000 years old, colonization of Alberta occurred from the south, and not along the so-called ice free corridor. Further doubts about the corridor began to arise in the late 1980s when sites older than 12,000 years (such as Monte Verde, Chile) began to be discovered; and clearly, people who lived at Monte Verde could not have used an ice free corridor to get there.

The oldest site known along the corridor is in northern British Columbia: Charlie Lake Cave, where the recovery of both southern bison bone and Clovis-like projectile points suggest that these colonists arrived from the south, and not from the north.

Clovis and the Ice Free Corridor

Recent archaeological studies in eastern Beringia, as well as detailed mapping of the route of the Ice Free Corridor, have led researchers to recognize that a passable opening between the ice sheets did exist beginning circa 14,000 cal BP (ca. 12,000 RCYBP). While too late to represent a passageway for preclovis peoples, the Ice Free Corridor, renamed the "western interior corridor" or "deglaciation corridor" most likely was the route taken by Clovis hunter-gatherers, as suggested by W.A. Johnson in the 1930s.

Alternative Routes

An alternative route of colonization has been proposed along the Pacific coast, which would have been ice-free and available for migration beginning about 14,500 BP. The change of path has also affected our understanding of the earliest colonists in the Americas: rather than Clovis 'big game hunters', the earliest Americans ("pre-Clovis") are now believed to have used a broad variety of food sources, including hunting, gathering, and fishing.

Sources

The Ice Free Corridor glossary entry is part of the Guide to the Population of America and the Dictionary of Archaeology.

More details on the problems with the Ice Free Corridor hypothesis can be found in this article written in 2004 for Geotimes by Lionel E. Jackson Jr. and Michael C. Wilson.

Arnold, Thomas G. 2002 Radiocarbon Dates from the Ice-Free Corridor. Radiocarbon 44(2):437-454.

Burns, James A. 1996 Vertebrate paleontology and the alleged ice-free corridor: The meat of the matter. Quaternary International 32:107-112.

Dixon EJ. In press. Late Pleistocene colonization of North America from Northeast Asia: New insights from large-scale paleogeographic reconstructions. Quaternary International in press.

Mandryk, Carole A. S., Heiner Josenhans, Daryl W. Fedje, and Rolf W. Mathewes 2001 Late Quaternary paleoenvironments of Northwestern North America: implications for inland versus coastal migration routes. Quaternary Science Reviews 20(1-3):301-314.

You are receiving this email because you subscribed to this feed at blogtrottr.com.
If you no longer wish to receive these emails, you can unsubscribe from this feed, or manage all your subscriptions

Archaeology: What's Hot Now: Ranking

Archaeology: What's Hot Now
These articles that had the largest increase in popularity over the last week // via fulltextrssfeed.com
Ranking
Dec 14th 2011, 11:01

Definition:

Ranking is a characteristic of complex societies in which different persons within a society have different quantities or qualities of power, rights and responsibilities. As societies grow in complexity, different tasks are assigned to specific people, called craft specialization. Sometimes specialization leads to status changes.

The study of ranking and social inequality in archaeology is based on the anthropological and economic studies of Elman Service (Primitive Social Organization, 1962) and Morton Fried (Evolution of Political Societies, 1967).

Service and Fried argued that there are two ways in which ranking of people in a society is arrived at: achieved and ascribed status. Achieved status results from being a warrior, artisan, shaman, or other useful profession or talent. and ascribed status (inherited from a parent or other relative). Ascribed status is based on kinship, which as a form of social organization ties the status of an individual within a group to descent, such as dynastic kings or hereditary rulers.

Ranking and Archaeology

In egalitarian societies, goods and services are spread relatively evenly among the population. High-ranking individuals in a community can be identified archaeologically by studying human burials, where differences in grave contents, the health of an individual or his or her diet can be examined. Ranking can also be established by the difference sizes of houses, the locations within a community, or the distribution of luxury or status items within a community.

Sources for Ranking

This glossary entry is a part of the Guide to the Characteristics of Ancient Civilizations, and part of the Dictionary of Archaeology.

A fairly brief bibliography of ranking and social stratification has been collected for this entry.

You are receiving this email because you subscribed to this feed at blogtrottr.com.
If you no longer wish to receive these emails, you can unsubscribe from this feed, or manage all your subscriptions

Archaeology: What's Hot Now: Huaca de la Luna (Peru)

Archaeology: What's Hot Now
These articles that had the largest increase in popularity over the last week // via fulltextrssfeed.com
Huaca de la Luna (Peru)
Dec 14th 2011, 11:01

Huaca de la Luna (Temple of the Moon) is a large Moche civilization pyramid temple, one of two located in the Huacas de Moche Site, the capital of the Southern Moche region. Huacas de Moche includes this pyramid and the Huaca del Sol (Temple of the Sun), separated by a large urban complex. Huacas de Moche was occupied between 200-700 AD.

Huaca de la Luna is the main temple feature at Huacas de Moche. Huaca de la Luna was used between about 500 and 800 AD, and its construction includes three large platform mounds with adjacent plazas, covering an area of 210x290 meters (690x950 feet).

Huaca de la Luna was built to express the religious and political control of its priests. It can only be accessed after crossing an enormous walled plaza and walking up a monumental ramp and through a single, narrow entrance on the north end. The plaza was large enough to accomodate hundreds of people; but in fact only privileged people had access to the upper platform, where ritualized violence such as human sacrifice was conducted.

The exterior walls of the platforms at Huaca de la Luna are covered wtih the remnants of mural paintings and sculptured reliefs, primarily of lines of warriors carrying shields and war clubs. Geometric designs decorate some of the walls in a checkerboard fashion, and a striking image of a two-headed serpent or a snarling stylized feline is rendered in several locations.

Huaca de la Luna and the Warrior Narrative

Huaca de la Luna has been associated with the Moche Warrior Narrative, largely on the strength of a discovery of 70 sacrificed warriors in a heap on Plaza 3A. The Warrior Narrative is an story told on murals and ceramic pot decorations at Moche sites throughout the period and region. The 70 bodies were of adult males between the ages of 15 and 39; their bones exhibited evidence of unusually strong musculature and both old (healed) fractures and recent ones.

The warriors had been killed either by having their throats slit or by skull fracture; several had been dismembered. Fifty-two unfired portrait pots were found within the bone deposit, each portraying a captive individual. This deposit of bones and pots is considered strong evidence that the Warrior Narrative (and in particular the Sacrifice Ceremony, seen in mural paintings and fineline ceramic decorations, were not just legends but illustrated real ritual events in the life of the Moche.

Excavations at Huaca de la Luna

Investigations at Huaca de la Luna have been conducted since the beginning of the 20th century by archaeologists including Max Uhle, Alfred Kroeber and Rafael Larco Hoyle. Most recently, excavations at the site have been conducted since 1991 by the Universidad Nacional de Trujillo. Beginning in 1999, a Franco-Peruvian team led by Claude Chauchat has been excavated at the foot of the huaca, and discovered 57 graves.

Sources

This glossary entry is a part of the guide to the Moche civilization , and the Dictionary of Archaeology.

Bourget S. 2001. Rituals of Sacrifice: Its practice at Huaca de la Luna and its representation in Moche [conography. pp 89-110 in Moche Art and Archaeology in Ancient Peru, Joanne Pillsbury, ed. National Gallery of Art, Washington DC.

Chapdelaine C. 2011. Recent Advances in Moche Archaeology. Journal of Archaeological Research 19(2):191-231.

Donnan CB. 2010. Moche State Religion: A Unifying Force in Moche Political Organization. In: Quilter J, and Castillo LJ, editors. New Perspectives on Moche Political Organization. Washington DC: Dumbarton Oaks. p 47-49.

Huchet JB, Deverly D, Gutierrez B, and Chauchat C. 2011. Taphonomic evidence of a human skeleton gnawed by termites in a Moche-civilisation grave at Huaca de la Luna, Peru. International Journal of Osteoarchaeology 21(1):92-102.

Huchet JB, and Greenberg B. 2010. Flies, Mochicas and burial practices: a case study from Huaca de la Luna, Peru. Journal of Archaeological Science 37(11):2846-2856.

Uceda S. 2001. Investigations at Huaca de la Luna, Moche Valley: An example of Moche religious architecture. Pp 47-68 in Moche Art and Archaeology in Ancient Peru, Joanne Pillsbury, ed. National Gallery of Art, Washington DC.

Verano JW. 2001. War and death in the Moche world: Osteological evidence and visual discourse. Pp 111-126 in Moche Art and Archaeology in Ancient Peru, Joanne Pillsbury, ed. National Gallery of Art, Washington DC.

You are receiving this email because you subscribed to this feed at blogtrottr.com.
If you no longer wish to receive these emails, you can unsubscribe from this feed, or manage all your subscriptions

Tuesday, December 13, 2011

Archaeology: What's Hot Now: Viking History

Archaeology: What's Hot Now
These articles that had the largest increase in popularity over the last week // via fulltextrssfeed.com
Viking History
Dec 13th 2011, 11:01

Viking history traditionally begins in northern Europe with the first Scandinavian raid on England, in AD 793, and ends with the death of Harald Hardrada in 1066, in a failed attempt to attain the English throne. During those 250 years, the political and religious structure of northern Europe was changed irrevocably. Some of that change can be directly attributed to the actions of the Vikings, and/or the response to Viking imperialism, and some of it cannot.

Viking Age Beginnings

Beginning in the 8th century AD, the Vikings began expanding out of Scandinavia, first as raids and then as imperialistic settlements into a wide swath of places from Russia to the North American continent.

The reasons for the Viking expansion outside of Scandinavia are debated among scholars. Reasons suggested include population pressure, political pressure, and personal enrichment. The Vikings could never have begun raiding or indeed settling beyond Scandinavia if they had not developed highly effective boat building and navigation skills; skills that were in evidence by the 4th century AD. At the time of the expansion, the Scandinavian countries were each experiencing a centralization of power, with fierce competition.

Viking Age: Settling Down

Fifty years after the first raids on the monastery at Lindisfarne, England, the Scandinavians ominously shifted their tactics: they began to spend the winters at various locations. In Ireland, the ships themselves became part of the over-wintering, when the Norse built an earthen bank on the landward side of their docked ships. These types of sites, called longphorts, are found prominently on the Irish coasts and inland rivers.

Viking Economics

The Viking economic pattern was a combination of pastoralism, long-distance trade and piracy. The type of pastoralism used by the Vikings was called landnám, and it was a successful strategy in the Faroe Islands, but it failed miserably in Greenland and Ireland, where the thin soils and climate change led to desperate circumstances.

The Viking trade system, supplemented by piracy, on the other hand, was extremely successful. While conducting raids on various peoples throughout Europe and western Asia, the Vikings obtained untold amounts of silver ingots, personal items and other booty, and buried them in hoards.

Legitimate trade in items such as cod, coins, ceramics, glass, walrus ivory, polar bear skins and, of course, slaves was conducted by the Vikings as early as the mid 9th century, in what must have been uneasy relationships between the Abbasids in Persia, and Charlemagne's empire in Europe.

Westward with the Viking Age

The Vikings arrived in Iceland in 873, and in Greenland in 985. In both cases, the importation of the landnam style of pastoralism led to dismal failure. In addition to a sharp decline in sea temperature, which led to deeper winters, the Norse found themselves in direct competition with the people they called the Skraelings, who we now understand are the ancestors of the Inuits of North America.

  • Read about the Eastern Settlement in Greenland.
  • Read more about archaeological theories about who the Skraelings were
  • Thule migration, the massive movement of Inuit ancestors once thought to be the cultural group called the Skraelings
  • Vinland Sagas, the stories about Viking adventures in North America

Forays westward from Greenland were undertaken in the very last years of the tenth century AD, and Leif Erickson finally made landfall on the Canadian shores in 1000 AD, at a site called L'anse Aux Meadows. The settlement there was doomed to failure, however.

Additional Sources about the Vikings

Viking Homeland Archaeological Sites

Norse Colony Archaeological Sites

You are receiving this email because you subscribed to this feed at blogtrottr.com.
If you no longer wish to receive these emails, you can unsubscribe from this feed, or manage all your subscriptions