Saturday, August 6, 2011

Archaeology: What's Hot Now: Hominin

Archaeology: What's Hot Now
These articles that had the largest increase in popularity over the last week
Hominin
Aug 6th 2011, 10:00

Definition:

Over the last few years, the word "hominin" has crept into the public news stories about our human ancestors. This is not a misspelling for hominid; this reflects an evolutionary change in the understanding of what it means to be human.

Up until the 1980s, paleoanthropologists generally followed the taxonomic system followed by the 18th century scientist Carl Linnaeus, when they spoke of the various species of humans. The family of Hominoids included the subfamily of Hominids (humans and their ancestors) and Anthropoids (chimps, gorillas, and orangutans). The problem is, recent molecular studies show that humans, chimps and gorillas are closer to one another than orangutans. So, scientists split the Hominoids into two subfamilies: Ponginae (orangutans) and Homininae (humans and their ancestors, and chimps and gorillas). But, we still need a way to discuss humans and their ancestors as a separate group, so researchers have proposed a further breakdown of the Homininae subfamily, to include Hominini (humans and their ancestors), Panini (chimps), and Gorillini (gorillas).

So, roughly speaking, a Hominin is what we used to call a Hominid; a creature that paleoanthropologists have agreed is human or a human ancestor. These include all of the Homo species (Homo sapiens, H. ergaster, H. rudolfensis), all of the Australopithecines (Australopithicus africanus, A. boisei, etc.) and other ancient forms like Paranthropus and Ardipithecus.

Read More

This definition is part of the Guide to the Paleolithic.

You are receiving this email because you subscribed to this feed at blogtrottr.com.
If you no longer wish to receive these emails, you can unsubscribe from this feed, or manage all your subscriptions

Archaeology: What's Hot Now: BCE (or B.C.E.)

Archaeology: What's Hot Now
These articles that had the largest increase in popularity over the last week
BCE (or B.C.E.)
Aug 6th 2011, 10:00

Definition:

BCE stands for "Before the Common Era" and it is basically equivalent to "BC", except that it doesn't have the Christian religious connotations of BC. That makes the usage preferable for some scholars.

Unfortunately, in our contentious world, using BCE also sometimes offends people, some of whom have suggested that we use plus signs and minus signs to indicate the years before the Julian calendar start date of 1 (there's no 0 in Julian).

Similarly, the abbreviation C.E. means "the Common Era." And it starts with the Julian calendar 1.

Proper Usage: 10 BCE, 133 CE

Other Common Calendar Designations

Sources

Taylor, Timothy 2008 Pehistory vs. Archaeology: Terms of Engagement. Journal of World Prehistory 2:11â€"18.

This glossary entry is part of the Guide to Calendar Designations and the Dictionary of Archaeology.

You are receiving this email because you subscribed to this feed at blogtrottr.com.
If you no longer wish to receive these emails, you can unsubscribe from this feed, or manage all your subscriptions

Archaeology: What's Hot Now: House of the Faun

Archaeology: What's Hot Now
These articles that had the largest increase in popularity over the last week
House of the Faun
Aug 6th 2011, 10:00

The floor plan of the House of the Faun illustrates its immensity--it covers an area of over 30,000 square feet. The size is comparable to eastern Hellenistic palaces --and Alexis Christensen has argued that the house was designed to imitate palaces like that found on Delos.

The detailed floor plan shown in the image was published by archaeologist August Mau in 1902, and it is somewhat out of date, particularly with reference to the identification of the purposes of the smaller rooms. But it shows the main flashy bits of the house--two atria and two peristyles.

A Roman atrium is a rectangular open air court, sometimes paved and sometimes with an interior basin for catching rainwater, called an impluvium. The two atria are the open rectangles at the front of the building (on the left side of this image)--the one with the 'Dancing Faun' that gives the House of the Faun it's name is the upper one. A peristyle is a large open courtyard surrounded with columns. That huge open space at the back of the house is the largest one; the central open space is the other.

Sources

For more on the archaeology of Pompeii, see Pompeii: Buried in Ashes.

For more on the archaeology of Pompeii, see Pompeii: Buried in Ashes.

Beard, Mary. 2008. The Fires of Vesuvius: Pompeii Lost and Found. Harvard University Press, Cambridge.

Christensen, Alexis. 2006. From palaces to Pompeii: The architectural and social context of Hellenistic floor mosaics in the House of the Faun. PhD dissertation, Department of Classics, Florida State University.

Mau, August. 1902. Pompeii, Its Life and Art. Translated by Francis Wiley Kelsey. The MacMillan Company.

You are receiving this email because you subscribed to this feed at blogtrottr.com.
If you no longer wish to receive these emails, you can unsubscribe from this feed, or manage all your subscriptions

Archaeology: What's Hot Now: Cultural Ecology

Archaeology: What's Hot Now
These articles that had the largest increase in popularity over the last week
Cultural Ecology
Aug 6th 2011, 10:00

Definition:

Cultural Ecology is an anthropological theory put forward by Julian Steward and used widely by archaeologists. Steward defined cultural ecology in his 1955 book The Theory of Culture Change as "the study of the processes by which a society adapts to its environment."

Cultural ecology is still quite a useful concept as the basis for archaeological and geographical research, although its emphasis on environmental determinism has been softened by succeeding applications of anthropological theory.

Sources

Butzer, Karl W. 1996 Ecology in the long view: Settlement histories, agrosystemic strategies, and ecological performance. Journal of Field Archaeology 23:141-150.

Steward, Julian H. and Frank M. Setzler 1938 Function and configuration in archaeology. American Antiquity 4(1):4-10.

Thomas, David H. 1973 An empirical test for Steward's model of Great Basin settlement patterns. American Antiquity 38(2):155-176.

This glossary entry is part of the Dictionary of Archaeology. Any mistakes are the responsibility of Kris Hirst.

You are receiving this email because you subscribed to this feed at blogtrottr.com.
If you no longer wish to receive these emails, you can unsubscribe from this feed, or manage all your subscriptions

Friday, August 5, 2011

Archaeology: What's Hot Now: Asmar (Iraq)

Archaeology: What's Hot Now
These articles that had the largest increase in popularity over the last week
Asmar (Iraq)
Aug 5th 2011, 10:00

Definition:

Tell Asmar is an ancient mound located in the Diyala Plain of Iraq. The enormous tell contains archaeological evidence of continuous occupation between the late fourth and early second millennia BC. Tell Asmar has an important Early Dynastic period [3000-2350 BC) occupation, and is believed to have been the provincial capital of Eshnunna during the Ur and Babylonia period (2065-1762 BC) of Mesopotamia.

The site includes mud brick architectural remains of residential structures, palaces, and numerous temples, such as the Abu Temple and Square Temple. Deep beneath the floor of the Square temple (Early Dynastic) was discovered the Asmar Sculpture Hoard, a cache of 12 carved statues, standing men and women with large eyes, upturned faces and hands clasped.

Tell Asmar was part of extensive excavations between 1930 and 1936 by the Oriental Institute in Diyala which defined the Early Dynastic period of Mesopotamia. About 25% of Tell Asmar (including an area of some 70,000 square meters) was excavated by a team led by Henri Frankfort. Laboratory analysis continues, under the leadership of McGuire Gibson as the Diyala Project, which will be a complete digital archive of the artifacts.

Sources

Dimand, Maurice S. 1945. A Sumerian Sculpture of the Third Millennium B.C.. The Metropolitan Museum of Art Bulletin, New Series 3(10):253-256.

Evans, Jean M. 2007 The Square Temple at Tell Asmar and the Construction of Early Dynastic Mesopotamia, ca. 2900-2350 B.C.E. American Journal of Archaeology 111(4):599-632. Free download

Gibson, McGuire 1982 A Re-Evaluation of the Akkad Period in the Diyala Region on the Basis of Recent Excavations at Nippur and in the Hamrin. American Journal of Archaeology 86(4):531-538.

This glossary entry is part of the Dictionary of Archaeology. Any mistakes are the responsibility of Kris Hirst.

Also Known As: Eshnunna, Asmar

You are receiving this email because you subscribed to this feed at blogtrottr.com.
If you no longer wish to receive these emails, you can unsubscribe from this feed, or manage all your subscriptions

Archaeology: What's Hot Now: European Iron Age

Archaeology: What's Hot Now
These articles that had the largest increase in popularity over the last week
European Iron Age
Aug 5th 2011, 10:00

The European Iron Age (~800-51 BC) (see also the African Iron Age) is what archaeologists have called that period of time in Europe where the development of complex urban societies was spurred by intensive manufacturing of bronze and iron, and extensive trading in and out of the Mediterranean basin. At the time, Greece was flourishing, and the Greeks saw an explicit division between the cultured peoples of the Mediterranean, as compared to the barbaric northerners of central, western and northern Europe.

Some scholars have argued that it was Mediterranean demand for exotic goods--salt, furs, amber, gold, slaves, foodstuffs, eventually iron weaponry--that drove the interaction, and led to the growth of an elite class in the hillforts of central Europe. Hillforts--fortified settlements located on the tops of hills above Europe's major rivers--became numerous during the early Iron Age, and many of them do show the presence of Mediterranean goods.

European Iron Age dates are traditionally set between the approximate period when iron became the principal tool-making material and the Roman conquests of the last century BC. Iron production was first established during the Late Bronze Age, but did not become widespread in central Europe until 800 BC, and in northern Europe by 600 BC.

Chronology of the Iron Age

800-450 BC (Early Iron Age--Hallstatt in central Europe, Jastorf in north central Europe)

The early part of the Iron Age is called the Hallstatt culture, and it was during this time in central Europe that elite chiefs rose in power, perhaps as a direct result of their connections to the Mediterranean Iron Age of classical Greece and the Etruscans. Hallstatt chiefs built or rebuilt a handful of hillforts in eastern France and southern Germany, and maintained an elite lifestyle.

Hallstatt sites: Heuneburg, Hohenasberg, Wurzburg, Breisach, Vix, Hochdorf, Camp de Chassey, Mont Lassois, Magdalenska Gora and Vace

450-50 BC (Late Iron Age, La Tène)

Between 450-400 BC, the Hallstatt elite system collapsed, and power shifted to a new set of people, under what was at first more egalitarian society. The La Tène culture grew in power and wealth because of their location on important trade routes used by the Mediterranean Greeks and Romans to acquire status goods. References to Celts, conflated with Gauls and meaning "central European barbarians", came from the Romans and Greeks; and the La Tène material culture is broadly agreed to represent those groups.

Eventually, population pressure within the populous La Tène zones forced younger La Tène warriors out, beginning the massive "Celtic migrations". La Tène populations moved southward into Greek and Roman areas, conducting extensive and successful raids, even into Rome itself, and eventually including most of the European continent. A new settlement system including central defended settlements called oppida were located in Bavaria and Bohemia. These were not princely residences, but instead residential, commercial, industrial and administrative centers that focused on trade and production for the Romans.

La Tene sites: Manching, Grauberg, Kelhim, Singindunum, Stradonice, Závist, Bibracte, Toulouse

Lifestyles of the Iron Age

By ca 800 BC, most of the people in northern and western Europe were in farming communities, including the essential grain crops of wheat, barley, rye, oats, lentils, peas and beans. Domesticated cattle, sheep, goats and pigs were used by Iron Age people; different parts of Europe relied on different suites of animals and crops, and many places supplemented their diets with wild game and fish and nuts, berries and fruit.

Villages were small, usually under a hundred people in residence, and the homes were built of wood with sunken floors and wattle and daub walls. It wasn't until near the end of the Iron Age that larger, town-like settlements began to appear.

Most communities manufactured their own goods for trade or use, including pottery, iron tools, weapons and ornaments. Bronze was most popular for personal ornaments; wood, bone, antler, stone, textiles and leather were also used. Trade goods between communities included bronze, Baltic amber and glass objects, and grinding stones in places far from their sources.

Social Change in the Iron Age

By the late 6th century BC, construction had begun on fortresses on the tops of hills. Building within the Hallstatt hillforts was quite dense, with rectangular timber-framed buildings built close together. Below the hill top (and outside the fortifications) lay extensive suburbs. Cemeteries had monumental mounds with exceptionally rich graves indicating social stratification.

The collapse of the Hallstatt elites saw the rise of La Tene egalitarians. Features associated with La Tene include inhumation burials and the disappearance of elite tumulus-style burials. Also indicated is a rise in the consumption of millet (Panicum miliaceum).

The fourth century BC began the out-migration of small groups of warriors from the La Tene heartland towards the Mediterranean Sea. These groups waged terrific raids against the inhabitants. One result was a discernible drop in the population at early La Tene sites.

Beginning in the middle of the second century BC, connections with the Mediterranean Roman world steadily increased and appeared to stabilize. New settlements such as Feddersen Wierde became established as production centers for Roman military bases. Marking the traditional end of what archaeologists consider the Iron Age, Caesar conquered Gaul in 51 BC and within a century, Roman culture became established in central Europe.

Iron Age Sites

Sources

Beck CW, Greenlie J, Diamond MP, Macchiarulo AM, Hannenberg AA, and Hauck MS. 1978. The chemical identification of baltic amber at the Celtic oppidum Staré Hradisko in Moravia. Journal of Archaeological Science 5(4):343-354.

Bujnal J. 1991. Approach to the study of the Late Hallstatt and Early La Tène periods in eastern parts of Central Europe: results from comparative classification of 'Knickwandschale'. Antiquity 65:368-375.

Cunliffe B. 2008. The Three Hundred Years that Changed the World: 800-500 BC. Chapter 9 in Europe Between the Oceans. Themes and Variations: 9000 BC-AD 1000. New Haven: Yale University Press. p, 270-316

Hummler M. 2007. Bridging the gap at La Tène. Antiquity 81:1067-1070.

Le Huray JD, and Schutkowski H. 2005. Diet and social status during the La Tène period in Bohemia: Carbon and nitrogen stable isotope analysis of bone collagen from Kutná Hora-Karlov and Radovesice. Journal of Anthropological Archaeology 24(2):135-147.

Loughton ME. 2009. Getting smashed: the deposition of amphorae and the drinking of wine in Gaul during the late Iron Age. Oxford Journal Of Archaeology 28(1):77-110.

Marciniak A. 2008. Europe, Central and Eastern. In: Pearsall DM, editor. Encyclopedia of Archaeology. New York: Academic Press. p 1199-1210.

Wells PS. 2008. Europe, Northern and Western: Iron Age. In: Pearsall DM, editor. Encyclopedia of Archaeology. London: Elsevier Inc. p 1230-1240.

You are receiving this email because you subscribed to this feed at blogtrottr.com.
If you no longer wish to receive these emails, you can unsubscribe from this feed, or manage all your subscriptions

Thursday, August 4, 2011

Archaeology: What's Hot Now: The Lower City of Hattusha

Archaeology: What's Hot Now
These articles that had the largest increase in popularity over the last week
The Lower City of Hattusha
Aug 4th 2011, 10:00

The first occupations at Hattusha we know about date to the Chalcolithic period of the 6th millennium BC, and they consist of small hamlets scattered about the region. By the end of the third millennium BC, a town had been built at the site, in what archaeologists call the Lower City, and what its inhabitants called Hattush. In the mid-17th century BC, during the Old Hittite Kingdom period, Hattush was taken over by one of the first Hittite kings, Hattusili I (ruled about 1600-1570 BC), and renamed Hattusha. Some 300 years later, during the height of the Hittite Empire, Hattusili's descendant Hattusili III (ruled 1265-1235 BC) expanded the city of Hattusha, (probably) building the Great Temple (also called Temple I) dedicated to the Storm God of Hatti and the Sun Goddess of Arinna. Hatushili III also built the portion of Hattusha called the Upper City.

Source:
Gregory McMahon. 2000. "The History of the Hittites." Pp. 59-75 in Across the Anatolian Plateau: Readings in the Archaeology of Ancient Turkey. Edited by David C. Hopkins. American School of Oriental Research, Boston.

You are receiving this email because you subscribed to this feed at blogtrottr.com.
If you no longer wish to receive these emails, you can unsubscribe from this feed, or manage all your subscriptions

Archaeology: What's Hot Now: The Great Temple at Hattusha

Archaeology: What's Hot Now
These articles that had the largest increase in popularity over the last week
The Great Temple at Hattusha
Aug 4th 2011, 10:00

The Great Temple at Hattusha was probably built by Hattusili III (ruled ca. 1265-1235 BC), during the height of the Hittite Empire. This powerful ruler is best remembered for his treaty with the Egyptian New Kingdom pharaoh, Ramses II.

The Temple Complex held a double wall enclosing the temples and a tememos, or large sacred precinct around the temple including an area of some 1400 square meters. This area eventually included several smaller temples, sacred pools, and shrines. The temple area had paved streets connecting the major temples, room clusters, and store rooms. Temple I is called the Great Temple, and it was dedicated to the Storm-God.

The temple itself measures some 42x65 meters. A large building complex of many rooms, its base course was built of dark green gabbro in contrast to the remainder of the buildings at Hattusa (in gray limestone). The entry way was through the gate house, which included guard rooms; it has been reconstructed and can be seen in the background of this photograph. The inner courtyard was paved with limestone slabs. In the foreground are the base courses of storage rooms, marked by ceramic pots still set into the ground.

Source:
Peter Neve. 2000. "The Great Temple in Boghazkoy-Hattusa." Pp. 77-97 in Across the Anatolian Plateau: Readings in the Archaeology of Ancient Turkey. Edited by David C. Hopkins. American School of Oriental Research, Boston.

You are receiving this email because you subscribed to this feed at blogtrottr.com.
If you no longer wish to receive these emails, you can unsubscribe from this feed, or manage all your subscriptions

Archaeology: What's Hot Now: The Upper City of Hattusha

Archaeology: What's Hot Now
These articles that had the largest increase in popularity over the last week
The Upper City of Hattusha
Aug 4th 2011, 10:00

The Hittite capital city of Hattusha (also spelled Hattushash, Hattousa, Hattuscha, and Hattusa) was discovered in 1834 by the French architect Charles Texier, although he wasn't completely aware of the importance of the ruins. During the next sixty years or so, numerous scholars came and drew the reliefs, but it wasn't until the 1890s that excavations were undertaken at Hattusha, by Ernst Chantre. By 1907, full scale excavations were under way, by Hugo Winckler, Theodor Makridi and Otto Puchstein, under the auspices of the German Archaeological Institute. Hattusha was inscribed as a World Heritage Site by UNESCO in 1986.

The discovery of Hattusha was an important one to the understanding of the Hittite Civilization. The earliest evidence for Hittites was found in Syria and Hittites were described in the Hebrew bible as a purely Syrian Nation. So, until the discovery of Hattusha, it was believed that Hittites were Syrian. The Hattusha excavations in Turkey revealed both the enormous strength and sophistication of the ancient Hittite Empire, and the time depth of the Hittite civilization centuries before the cultures now called Neo-Hittites were mentioned in the bible.

In this photograph, the excavated ruins of Hattusha are seen in the distance from the upper city. Other important cities in the Hittite Civilization include Gordion, Sarissa, Kultepe, Purushanda, Acemhoyuk, Hurma, Zalpa, and Wahusana.

Source:
Peter Neve. 2000. "The Great Temple in Boghazkoy-Hattusa." Pp. 77-97 in Across the Anatolian Plateau: Readings in the Archaeology of Ancient Turkey. Edited by David C. Hopkins. American School of Oriental Research, Boston.

You are receiving this email because you subscribed to this feed at blogtrottr.com.
If you no longer wish to receive these emails, you can unsubscribe from this feed, or manage all your subscriptions

Archaeology: What's Hot Now: Olive History

Archaeology: What's Hot Now
These articles that had the largest increase in popularity over the last week
Olive History
Aug 4th 2011, 10:00

Olives are the fruit of a tree that today can be found as nearly 2,000 separate cultivars within the Mediterranean basin alone. Today olives come in a huge variety of fruit sizes, shape and color, and they are grown on every continent except Antarctica. But olive history and domestication is a complicated one.

Olives in their native state are virtually inedible by humans, although domestic animals like cattle and goats don't seem to mind the bitter flavor. Once cured in brine, of course, olives are very tasty. Olive wood burns even when wet; which makes it very useful. It is likely that the original use of olives was for the oil, which is virtually smoke free and can be used in cooking and lamps, and in many other ways.

Olive History

The olive tree (Olea europaea var. europaea) is thought to have been domesticated from the wild oleaster (Olea europaea var. sylvestris), at a minimum of nine different times. The earliest probably dates to the Neolithic migration into the Mediterranean basin, ~6000 years ago.

Propagating olive trees is a vegetative process; that is to say, successful trees are not grown from seeds, but rather from cut roots or branches buried in the soil and allowed to root, or grafted onto other trees. Regular pruning helps the grower keep access to the olives in the lower branches, and olive trees are known to survive for centuries, some reportedly for as much as 2,000 years or more.

The first domesticated olives are likely from the Near East (Israel, Palestine, Jordan), or at least the eastern end of the Mediterranean Sea, although some debate persists about its origins and spread. Archaeological evidence suggests that the domestication of olive trees spread into the western Mediterranean and North Africa by the Early Bronze Age, ~4500 years ago.

Archaeological Evidence of Olive History

Olive wood samples have been recovered from the Upper Paleolithic site of Boker in Israel. The earliest evidence of olive use discovered to date is at Ohalo II, where ca 19,000 years ago, olive pits and wood fragments were found. Wild olives (oleasters) were used for oils throughout the Mediterranean basin during the Neolithic period (ca 10,000-7,000 years ago). Olive pits have been recovered from the Natufian period (ca 9000 BC) occupations in Mount Carmel in Israel. Palynological (pollen) studies have identifed olive oil presses by the early Bronze Age (ca 4500 years ago) in Greece and other parts of the Mediterranean.

Scholars using molecular and archaeological evidence (presence of pits, pressing equipment, oil lamps, pottery containers for oil, olive timber and pollen, etc.) have identified separate domestication centers in Turkey, Palestine, Greece, Cyprus, Tunisia, Algeria, Morocco, Corsica, Spain and France.

Olive History Sites

Archaeological sites important to understanding the domestication history of the olive include Ohalo II, Kfar Samir, (pits dated to 5530-4750 BC); Nahal Megadim (pits 5230-4850 cal BC) and Qumran (pits 540-670 cal AD), all in Israel; Teleilat Ghassul (4000-3300 BC), Jordan; Cueva del Toro (Spain).

Sources and Further Information

This glossary entry is a part of the guide to the Plant Domestication and the Dictionary of Archaeology.

Angiolillo A, Mencuccini M, and Baldoni L. 1999. Olive genetic diversity assessed using amplified fragment length polymorphisms. TAG Theoretical and Applied Genetics 98(3):411-421.

Besnard G, and Bervillé A. 2000. Multiple origins for Mediterranean olive (Olea europaea L. ssp. europaea) based upon mitochondrial DNA polymorphisms. Comptes Rendus de l'Académie des Sciences - Series III - Sciences de la Vie 323(2):173-181.

Breton C, Terral J-F, Pinatel C, Médail F, Bonhomme F, and Bervillé A. 2009. The origins of the domestication of the olive tree. Comptes Rendus Biologies 332(12):1059-1064.

Breton C, Pinatel C, Médail F, Bonhomme F, and Bervillé A. 2008. Comparison between classical and Bayesian methods to investigate the history of olive cultivars using SSR-polymorphisms. Plant Science 175(4):524-532.

Elbaum R, Melamed-Bessudo C, Boaretto E, Galili E, Lev-Yadun S, Levy AA, and Weiner S. 2006. Ancient olive DNA in pits: preservation, amplification and sequence analysis. Journal of Archaeological Science 33(1):77-88.

Liphschitz N, Gophna R, Hartman M, and Biger G. 1991. The beginning of olive (olea europaea) cultivation in the old world: A reassessment. Journal of Archaeological Science 18(4):441-453.

Marinova E, van der Valk J, Valamoti S, and Bretschneider J. 2011. An experimental approach for tracing olive processing residues in the archaeobotanical record, with preliminary examples from Tell Tweini, Syria. Vegetation History and Archaeobotany:1-8.

Terral JF, Alonso N, Capdevila RBi, Chatti N, Fabre L, Fiorentino G, Marinval P, Jordá GP, Pradat B, Rovira N et al. 2004. Historical biogeography of olive domestication (Olea europaea L.) as revealed by geometrical morphometry applied to biological and archaeological material. Journal of Biogeography 31(1):63-77.

You are receiving this email because you subscribed to this feed at blogtrottr.com.
If you no longer wish to receive these emails, you can unsubscribe from this feed, or manage all your subscriptions

Archaeology: What's Hot Now: African Iron Age

Archaeology: What's Hot Now
These articles that had the largest increase in popularity over the last week
African Iron Age
Aug 4th 2011, 10:00

The African Iron Age is traditionally considered that period in Africa between the second century AD up to about 1000 AD, when iron smelting was practiced. In Africa, unlike the Europe and Asia, the Iron Age is not prefaced by a Bronze or Copper Age, but rather all the metals were brought together. The advantages of iron over stone are obvious--iron is much more efficient at cutting trees or quarrying stone than stone tools. But iron smelting technology is a smelly, dangerous one. This brief essay covers Iron Age up to the end of the first millennium AD.

Pre-Industrial Iron Ore Technology

To work iron, one must extract the ore from the ground and break it into pieces, then heat the pieces to a temperature of at least 1100 degrees centigrade under controlled conditions.

African Iron Age people built a cylindrical clay furnace and used charcoal and a hand-operated bellows to reach the level of heating for smelting. Once smelted, the metal was separated from its waste products or slag, and then brought to its shape by repeated hammering and heating, called forging.

African Iron Age Lifeways

From the 2nd century AD to about 1000 AD, the Chifumbaze spread iron throughout the largest portion of Africa, eastern and southern Africa. The Chifumbaze were farmers of squash, beans, sorghum and millet, and kept cattle, sheep, goats and chickens.

They built hill top settlements, at Bosutswe, large villages like Schroda, and large monumental sites like Great Zimbabwe. Gold, ivory, and glass bead working and trade was part of many of the societies. Many spoke a form of Bantu; many forms of geometric and schematic rock art are found throughout south and eastern Africa.

African Iron Age Time Line

  • 2nd millennium BC: West Asians invent iron smelting
  • 8th century BC: Phoenicians bring iron to North Africa (Lepcis Magna, Carthage)
  • 8th-7th century BC: First iron smelting in Ethiopia
  • 671 BC: Hyksos invasion of Egypt
  • 7th-6th century BC: First iron smelting in the Sudan (Meroe, Jebel Moya)
  • 5th century BC: First iron smelting in West Africa (Jenne-Jeno, Taruka)
  • 5th century BC: Iron using in eastern and southern Africa (Chifumbaze)
  • 4th century BC: Iron smelting in central Africa (Obobogo, Oveng, Tchissanga)
  • 3rd century BC: First iron smelting in Punic North Africa
  • 30 BC: Roman conquest of Egypt 1st century AD: Jewish revolt against Rome
  • 1st century AD: Establishment of Aksum
  • 1st century AD: Iron smelting in southern and eastern Africa (Buhaya, Urewe)
  • 2nd century AD: Heyday of Roman control of North Africa
  • 2nd century AD: Widespread iron smelting in southern and eastern Africa (Bosutswe, Toutswe, Lydenberg
  • AD 639: Arab invasion of Egypt
  • 9th century AD: Lost wax method bronze casting (Igbo Ukwu)
  • 8th century AD; Kingdom of Ghana, Kumbi Selah, Tegdaoust, Jenne-Jeno

African Iron Age Sites

African Iron Age cultures: Akan culture, Chifumbaze, Urewe

African Iron Age issues: Sirikwa Holes, Inagina: Last House of Iron, Nok Art, Toutswe Tradition

Sources

See the glossary entries for data on each site.

David Phillipson. 2005. Iron-using peoples before 1000 AD. African Archaeology, 3rd edition. Cambridge Press: Cambridge.

You are receiving this email because you subscribed to this feed at blogtrottr.com.
If you no longer wish to receive these emails, you can unsubscribe from this feed, or manage all your subscriptions

Wednesday, August 3, 2011

Archaeology: What's Hot Now: Texas Archaeological Society Field School, 1970

Archaeology: What's Hot Now
These articles that had the largest increase in popularity over the last week
Texas Archaeological Society Field School, 1970
Aug 3rd 2011, 10:00

Rock concentration/military campfire (Texas Archaeological Society Field School, 1970; courtesy of Anne Fox).

Rock concentration/military campfire (Texas Archaeological Society Field School, 1970

Rock concentration/military campfire (Texas Archaeological Society Field School, 1970; courtesy of Anne Fox).

Anne Fox (c) 1970

The existence of the Pine Springs Camp (41CU44) had long been known. Located on the eastern slopes of the Guadalupe Mountains, it overlooks the Pinery, one of the stations on the Butterfield Stage Trail. It is also situated near the modern road and the Guadalupe Mountains National Park Visitors' Center. According to local historians, it was one of many army outposts that proliferated in the American West during the 19th century, with detachments from various forts occupying it intermittently both before and after the Civil War. It also housed the Civilian Conservation Corps in the 1930s and a goat-herding operation before becoming Park land.

Archaeologically, the Pine Springs Camp was first explored in 1970 by the Texas Archaeological Society field school. Field school members surveyed the site, which is situated on a north-south slope between Upper and Lower Pine Springs. They noted regular concentrations of stone rubble, some of them burned, aligned parallel to the slope, which they tentatively identified as military campfires. The crew mapped these features and an adjacent wagon road that ran from the Butterfield station to Upper Pine Springs. They also collected a few artifacts (bottles, nails), mostly from the rubble concentrations. Historian John Wilson dated these objects to the mid to late 1800s, but as field director Kathleen Gilmore (1970) observed, only excavation would clarify the features’ chronology. That excavation would come 34 years later, under the auspices of the Warriors Archaeology Project.

Sources

A bibliography has been collected for this project.

You are receiving this email because you subscribed to this feed at blogtrottr.com.
If you no longer wish to receive these emails, you can unsubscribe from this feed, or manage all your subscriptions

Tuesday, August 2, 2011

Archaeology: What's Hot Now: Who Were the Aryans?

Archaeology: What's Hot Now
These articles that had the largest increase in popularity over the last week
Who Were the Aryans?
Aug 2nd 2011, 10:00

One of the most interesting puzzles in archaeology, and one that hasn't been completely solved yet, concerns the story of the supposed Aryan invasion of the Indian subcontinent. The story goes like this: The Aryans were a tribe of Indo-European-speaking, horse-riding nomads living in the arid steppes of Eurasia. Sometime around 1700 BC, the Aryans invaded the ancient urban civilizations of the Indus Valley, and destroyed that culture. The Indus Valley civilizations were far more civilized than any horse-back nomad, having had a written language, farming capabilities, and led a truly urban existence. Some 1,200 years after the supposed invasion, the descendants of the Aryans, so they say, wrote the classic Indian literature called the Vedic manuscripts.

Adolf Hitler and the Aryan/Dravidian Myth

Adolf Hitler twisted the theories of Gustaf Kossinna (1858-1931), to put forward the Aryans as a master race of Indo-Europeans, who were supposed to be Nordic in appearance and directly ancestral to the Germans. These Nordic invaders were defined as directly opposite to native south Asian peoples, called Dravidians, who were supposed to have been darker-skinned.

The problem is, most if not all of this story--"Aryans" as a cultural group, invasion from the arid steppes, Nordic appearance, the Indus Civilization being destroyed, and, certainly not least, the Germans being descended from them--may not be true at all.

Aryans and the History of Archaeology

During the 19th century, many European missionaries and imperialists traveled the world seeking conquests and converts. One country which saw a great deal of this kind of exploration was India (including what is now Pakistan). Some of the missionaries were also antiquarians by avocation, and one such fellow was the French missionary Abbé Dubois(1770-1848). His manuscript on Indian culture makes some unusual reading today; the good Abbé tried to fit in what he understood of Noah and the Great Flood with what he was reading in the great literature of India. It was not a good fit, but he did describe Indian civilization at the time, and provided some pretty bad translations of the literature.

It was the Abbé's work, translated into English by the British East India Company in 1897 and with a laudatory preface by German archaeologist Max Muller, that formed the basis of the Aryan invasion story--not the Vedic manuscripts themselves. Scholars had long noted the similarities between Sanskrit, the ancient language in which the classical Vedic texts are written, and other Latin-based languages such as French and Italian. And when the first excavations at the large Indus Valley site of Mohenjo Daro were completed early in the 20th century, and it was recognized as a truly advanced civilization, a civilization not mentioned in the Vedic manuscripts, among some circles this was considered ample evidence that an invasion of people related to the peoples of Europe had occurred, destroying the earlier civilization and creating the second great civilization of India.

Flawed Arguments and Recent Investigations

It turns out that there are serious problems with this argument. There are no references to an invasion in the Vedic manuscripts; and the Sanskrit word "Aryas" means "noble", not a superior cultural group. Secondly, recent archaeological evidence suggests that the Indus civilization was shut down by droughts combined with a devasting flood, not a violent confrontation. Recent archaeological evidence also shows that many of the so-called "Indus River" valley peoples lived in the Sarasvati River, which is mentioned in the Vedic manuscripts as a homeland. There is no biological or archaeological evidence of a massive invasion of people of a different race.

The most recent studies concerning the Aryan/Dravidian myth include language studies, which have attempted to decipher and thereby discover the origins of the Indus script, and the Vedic manuscripts, to determine the origins of the Sanskrit in which it was written. Excavations at the site of Gola Dhoro in Gujarat suggest the site was abandoned quite suddenly, although why that may occurred is yet to be determined.

Racism and Science

Born from a colonial mentality, corrupted by a Nazi propaganda machine, the Aryan invasion theory is finally undergoing radical reassessment by south Asian archaeologists and their colleagues, using the Vedic documents themselves, additional linguistic studies, and physical evidence revealed through archaeological excavations. The Indus valley cultural history is an ancient and complex one. Only time will teach us what role if any an Indo-European invasion took in the history; but it seems clear that a collapse of the Indus civilization did not occur.

Thanks to Omar Khan of Harappa.com for assistance with this feature. Any mistakes are the responsibility of Kris Hirst

You are receiving this email because you subscribed to this feed at blogtrottr.com.
If you no longer wish to receive these emails, you can unsubscribe from this feed, or manage all your subscriptions

Archaeology: What's Hot Now: Hittites

Archaeology: What's Hot Now
These articles that had the largest increase in popularity over the last week
Hittites
Aug 2nd 2011, 10:00

Definition: Two different types of "Hittites" are mentioned in the Hebrew Bible (or Old Testament): the Canaanites, who were enslaved by Solomon; and the Neo-Hittites, Hittite kings of northern Syria who traded with Solomon. The events related in the Old Testament occurred in the 6th century BC, well after the glory days of the Hittite Empire.

The discovery of the Hittite capital city of Hattusha was an important event in archaeology of the near east, because it increased our understanding of the Hittite Empire as a powerful, sophisticated civilization of the 13th through 17th centuries BC.

The Hittite Civilization

What we call the Hittite civilization began as an amalgam of people who lived in Anatolia during the 19th and 20th centuries BC (called the Hatti), and new Indo-Europeans migrants into the Hatti region called the Nesites or the people of Nesa. One of the pieces of evidence for such a cosmopolitan empire is that the cuneiform archives at Hattusha are written in several languages, including Hittite, Akkadian, Hattic, and other Indo-European languages. During their heyday between 1340 and 1200 BC, the Hittite empire ruled much of Anatolia--roughly what today is Turkey.

Timeline

  • Old Hittite Kingdom [ca. 1600-1400 BC]
  • Middle Kingdom [ca. 1400-1343 BC]
  • Hittite Empire [1343-1200 BC]
Note: The chronology of the Hittite civilization is obscured, because it must rely on another culture's historical documents, such as Egyptian, Assyrian, Mesopotamian, all of which vary. The above is the so-called "Low Chronology", which dates the sack of Babylon at 1531 BC.

Sources

Articles by Ronald Gorny, Gregory McMahon, and Peter Neves, among others, in Across the Anatolian Plateau, ed. by David C. Hopkins. American Schools of Oriental Research 57.

Examples:

Important Hittite cities include Hattusha (now called Boghazkhoy), Carchemish (now Jerablus), Kussara or Kushshar (which has not been relocated), and Kanis. (now Kultepe)

You are receiving this email because you subscribed to this feed at blogtrottr.com.
If you no longer wish to receive these emails, you can unsubscribe from this feed, or manage all your subscriptions

Archaeology: What's Hot Now: Complex Societies

Archaeology: What's Hot Now
These articles that had the largest increase in popularity over the last week
Complex Societies
Aug 2nd 2011, 10:00

Definition:

Archaeologists recognize that in some cases, in some places, at some times, simple societies for one reason and another morph into more and more complex societies, and some become civilizations. The reasons for this are quite controversial, but the characteristics of complexity recognized in ancient civilizations are pretty much agreed upon:

Not all of these characteristics necessarily have to be present for a particular cultural group to be considered a civilization, but all of them are considered evidence of relatively complex societies.

This glossary entry is part of the Dictionary of Archaeology. Any mistakes are the responsibility of Kris Hirst.

You are receiving this email because you subscribed to this feed at blogtrottr.com.
If you no longer wish to receive these emails, you can unsubscribe from this feed, or manage all your subscriptions

Archaeology: What's Hot Now: Horticulture

Archaeology: What's Hot Now
These articles that had the largest increase in popularity over the last week
Horticulture
Aug 2nd 2011, 10:00

Definition:

Horticulture is a process by which a plot of soil is prepared for the planting of seeds, tubers, or cuttings. It is tended to control competition from intrusive plants (weeds), and protected from predatory animals including humans. The crop is harvested, processed, and usually stored in specialized containers or structures. Some produce, often significant a quantity, is eaten during the growing season, but an important element is having the wherewithal to store food for future consumption, trade or ceremonies. Sharing food remains a crucial element of many, if not most, human ceremonies.

Horticulture and Gardening

A garden, being a more or less permanent location, forces those who tend and harvest the garden to settle down in its vicinity. Garden produce has value, so a group of humans must cooperate to the extent that they can protect themselves and their produce from those who would rather steal it. It is telling that many of the earliest horticulturalists also lived in fortified communities. There is safety in numbers, and there is safety in walls. The notion of "peaceful horticulturalists" is a myth of wishful thinking.

Settling down in a community does not lead to gardening -- gardening leads to settling down in communities. You can't take it with you.

Michael Scullin, ethnohorticulturalist

This glossary entry is a part of the Guide to Ancient Farming and part of the Dictionary of Archaeology.

Also Known As: Gardening

You are receiving this email because you subscribed to this feed at blogtrottr.com.
If you no longer wish to receive these emails, you can unsubscribe from this feed, or manage all your subscriptions