Wednesday, November 23, 2011

Archaeology: What's Hot Now: Malta Temples

Archaeology: What's Hot Now
These articles that had the largest increase in popularity over the last week // via fulltextrssfeed.com
Malta Temples
Nov 23rd 2011, 10:08

Some archaeologists have commented, looking at the dark interiors of the Malta temples, that the temples may have originated as above-ground replications of rock-cut tombs. Indeed, several of the complex temples are associated with the mega burial sites; but the temples themselves do not contain burials. When the roofs were intact, they were dark, enclosed spaces with red-plastered walls, with labyrinthine, branching, dark passages which had eerie acoustical properties. The buildings are way too massive for the needs of the population, and they are flat low structures with dun-colored local limestone and maybe flat wattle and daub roofing that echoes the environment after the forests had been removed.

The temples have a clear dichotomy, there's a distinct inside and outside, a division between front and rear, and access to the interior is restricted by way of a series of doorways and closed off areas. In some of the temples are "oracle holes", narrow slots in the wall which connect the inner temples with exterior rooms. Researchers have suggested that they were used as communication pathways to transmit knowledge between a small insider group and a larger group outside.

The inner furniture consists of built-in stone tables or "altars", and stone doors coupled with partitions made of organic materials. Artifacts found inside the temples include chert and obsidian tools, polished stone axes and amulets, pottery, and small figurines of females, figures without clearly defined sexual attributes and animals. Architectural details also include small holes drilled into the walls and floors without obvious purpose. Animal sacrifices inside the temples are suggested by finds of domesticated animal bones and flint blades, and feasting has been inferred from the large number of carinated bowls.

Sources

See the Malta Temples bibliography for more information.

You are receiving this email because you subscribed to this feed at blogtrottr.com.
If you no longer wish to receive these emails, you can unsubscribe from this feed, or manage all your subscriptions

Archaeology: What's Hot Now: Pigs

Archaeology: What's Hot Now
These articles that had the largest increase in popularity over the last week // via fulltextrssfeed.com
Pigs
Nov 23rd 2011, 10:08

Pigs were first domesticated in central Asia, at least as long ago as 9000 years, and perhaps a couple thousand years older. They were part of the original suite of domesticates, including sheep, goats, wheat and barley, that were spread into Europe via the Linearbandkeramik. Archaeological sites with evidence for early pigs include Hallam Çemi, Çayönü Tepesi, and Neval Çori in eastern Turkey.

You are receiving this email because you subscribed to this feed at blogtrottr.com.
If you no longer wish to receive these emails, you can unsubscribe from this feed, or manage all your subscriptions

Tuesday, November 22, 2011

Archaeology: What's Hot Now: Library of Ashurbanipal

Archaeology: What's Hot Now
These articles that had the largest increase in popularity over the last week // via fulltextrssfeed.com
Library of Ashurbanipal
Nov 22nd 2011, 10:02

The Library of Ashurbanipal (also spelled Assurbanipal) is a collection of clay tablets recovered by Austen Henry Layard in the mid-19th century at the Mesopotamian city of Nineveh. The library included 25,000 clay tablet fragments adding up to about 1200 texts written in cuneiform. The texts cover information on all kinds of things-- including religion, bureaucracy, science, mathematics, poetry, medicine. The tablets were written during the Assyrian king Ashurbanipal's reign between about 668-627 BC.

Many of the texts involve recipes and technical instructions on how to do things, such as make glass and perfume. Also included were dictionaries and lists of proverbs. A version of the Sumerian Epic of Gilgamesh was also among the documents, as were myths, astronomical observations, prayers, administrative documents and letters.

Sources

Quotations from the Library of Ashurbanipal are found in several places in the Internet, including Babylonian Proverbs at the Ancient History Sourcebook ("The life of day before yesterday has departed today"). The Epic of Gilgamesh is available in glorious detail on the Ancient Texts site.

A brief description of the library is available at the Library of King Ashurbanipal Web Page. A few images of the tablets can be seen on the Sackler Gallery at the British Museum website, where many of the tablets are stored. Others are at the Iraq Museum of Antiquities and the Oriental Institute in Chicago.

Researcher Jeanette C. Fincke has a useful webpage called Nineveh Tablet Collection, with a catalog of the texts (although the database doesn't seem to work). Eleanor Robson's Assurbanipal's Library at the Knowledge and Power website is also quite useful.

British Museum welcomes Iraq library project (BBC News, 10 May 2002

Cogan, Mordechai and Hayim Tadmor. 1988. Ashurbanipal Texts in the Collection of the Oriental Institute, University of Chicago. Journal of Cuneiform Studies 40(1): 84-96

Shortland, A. J. 2007 Who were the glassmakers? Status, theory and method in mid-second millennium glass production. Oxford Journal of Archaeology 26(3):261-274.

You are receiving this email because you subscribed to this feed at blogtrottr.com.
If you no longer wish to receive these emails, you can unsubscribe from this feed, or manage all your subscriptions

Archaeology: What's Hot Now: Debra L. Friedkin Site (Texas)

Archaeology: What's Hot Now
These articles that had the largest increase in popularity over the last week // via fulltextrssfeed.com
Debra L. Friedkin Site (Texas)
Nov 22nd 2011, 10:02

The Debra L. Friedkin site is a Pre-Clovis, Paleoindian and Archaic period site located in the alluvial floodplain of Buttermilk Creek in central Texas, about 250 meters downstream of the famous Gault Clovis site. The multiple components of the Friedkin site are in correct stratigraphic order, with Folsom overlying Clovis, overlying the Pre-Clovis strata in what excavators are calling the Buttermilk Creek Complex.

Stratigraphy of Debra L. Friedkin Site

The Friedkin site is located on a fluvial terrace within the Buttermilk Creek floodplain. The site includes stacked early Archaic, Paleoindian, and Pre-Clovis levels, below a mixed Late Prehistoric-Late Archaic level and above a layer without artifacts at all. No features were discovered at the site, and no charcoal was identified: dates of the site's occupations were determined using optically stimulated luminescence (OSL) on the soils in which the artifacts were recovered.

  • Surface
  • Late Prehistoric-Late Archaic (30-50 cm thick) Edgewod, Ensor, Castroville, Perdiz, Gary, Darl, Scallorn points (7160-7600 BP)
  • Early Archaic (40 cm) Wells, Angostura points (8070-10,480 BP)
  • Folsom (3.5 cm) Folsom points (13,090 BP)
  • Clovis (2.5 cm) Clovis bifaces (13,780 BP)
  • Pre-Clovis (20 cm) (14,350-16,170 BP)
  • Sterile layer (20,330-24,420 BP)
  • Limestone Bedrock

Pre-Clovis Artifacts at Friedkin

More than 15,000 lithic artifacts were recovered from the Pre-Clovis occupations at Friedkin, including 56 stone tools; the remainder of the artifacts are debitage, stone flakes left over from stone tool construction. All of the chert artifacts are from locally-available Edwards chert. The tools include 12 bifaces, 1 core, 23 flake tools, 5 blade fragments, 14 bladelets and a piece of polished hematite. Usewear on some of the blades indicate that they were used to cut and scrape hard material such as bone, antler or wood, perhaps as a result of animal butchering or wood-working. The tools also include gravers and lanceolate forms.

Five refits were identified within the Buttermilk Creek Complex levels, consisting of two technological refits and three conjoining refit flake fragments. All were found within the same level of the same unit, with a maximum vertical separation of 2.5 cm and a maximum horizontal separation of 1.4 meters. Piece-plotting of two sets of refits, and calcium carbonate accumulations on the breakage surface, lend support to the breakage as having taken place at the time of occupation, and the artifacts being in situ rather than fluvially-placed.

Friedkin Site Function

If the Friedkin site is an in situ occupation, and it certainly looks that way, functions in evidence suggest that the Pre-Clovis people visited Buttermilk Creek to exploit the locally available chert, making stone tools and doing some animal butchering and/or wood working before moving on.

Excavators Michael R. Waters et al. argue that the site's core reduction strategies and biface- and blade-dominated tool kit are evolutionary precursors to Clovis technologies. They point to similar bifaces, flake tools and debitage at other Pre-Clovis sites such as Schaefer and Hebior mammoth sites (Wisconsin) and Meadowcroft Rockshelter (Pennsylvania).

Sources

This glossary entry is a part of the guide to Pre-Clovis Culture, and the Dictionary of Archaeology.

Waters MR, Forman SL, Jennings TA, Nordt LC, Driese SG, Feinberg JM, Keene JL, Halligan J, Lindquist A, Pierson J et al. 2011. The Buttermilk Creek Complex and the Origins of Clovis at the Debra L. Friedkin Site, Texas. Science 331:1599-1603.

Waters MR, Forman SL, Jennings TA, Nordt LC, Driese SG, Feinberg JM, Keene JL, Halligan J, Lindquist A, Pierson J et al. 2011. Supporting Online Material for The Buttermilk Creek Complex and the Origins of Clovis at the Debra L. Friedkin Site, Texas. Science magazine.

You are receiving this email because you subscribed to this feed at blogtrottr.com.
If you no longer wish to receive these emails, you can unsubscribe from this feed, or manage all your subscriptions

Archaeology: What's Hot Now: Scenes from Paradise

Archaeology: What's Hot Now
These articles that had the largest increase in popularity over the last week // via fulltextrssfeed.com
Scenes from Paradise
Nov 22nd 2011, 10:02

Image 05.18. Mosaic of Lion, 3rd century-5th century A.D. Unknown Roman artist, found in Tunis, Tunisia. 28 7/16 x 6 13/16 in. (72.2 x 17.3 cm). Museum Collection Fund, Brooklyn Museum

This photo essay is from the 2006 exhibit at the Brooklyn Museum, which included a collection of Roman mosaics recovered from the 3rd century AD Jewish synagogue at Naro, Tunisia. The mosaics, showing natural, religious and personal images, exemplify a little-known way of life, that of wealthy Jewish citizens of the late Roman empire in Africa.

You are receiving this email because you subscribed to this feed at blogtrottr.com.
If you no longer wish to receive these emails, you can unsubscribe from this feed, or manage all your subscriptions

Monday, November 21, 2011

Archaeology: The Aurignacian at Franchthi Cave

Archaeology
Get the latest headlines from the Archaeology GuideSite. // via fulltextrssfeed.com
The Aurignacian at Franchthi Cave
Nov 21st 2011, 08:48

Franchthi Cave is an enormous cave in the Argolid of Greece, where continuous human occupation between 35,000 and 3,000 years ago were documented in the 1970s. Recently, the lowest levels of the cave, assigned to the Early and Evolved Aurignacian periods, were re-investigated and reported in the journal Antiquity.

Franchthi Cave Entrance, Greece
Entrance to Franchthi Cave, photo by Stelios

The research reports new dates, surrounding the identification of ash from the Campanian Ignimbrite event, a violent volcanic eruption believed to have occurred in the Phlegraean Fields of Italy ~39,000 years ago. The CI Event has been identified in association with early Aurignacian levels at sites throughout Europe, notably at Kostenki in Russia.

  • Franchthi Cave, details on chronology and UP artifacts including perforated shell

Douka K, Perles C, Valladas H, Vanhaeren M, and Hedges REM. 2011. Franchthi Cave revisited: the age of the Aurignacian in south-eastern Europe. Antiquity 85(330):1131-1150.

You are receiving this email because you subscribed to this feed at blogtrottr.com.
If you no longer wish to receive these emails, you can unsubscribe from this feed, or manage all your subscriptions

Archaeology: What's Hot Now: Ice Free Corridor

Archaeology: What's Hot Now
These articles that had the largest increase in popularity over the last week // via fulltextrssfeed.com
Ice Free Corridor
Nov 21st 2011, 10:02

The so-called Ice Free Corridor hypothesis has been the accepted human colonization route for the American continents since at least the 1930s. This route was postulated by archaeologists looking for a way by which humans could have entered North America during the late Wisconsinan ice age. Essentially, the hypothesis suggested that Clovis culture hunters arrived in North America chasing after megafauna (mammoth and bison) through a corridor between the ice slabs. The corridor was thought to have crossed what is now the provinces of Alberta and eastern British Columbia, between the Laurentide and Cordilleran ice masses.

Questioning the Ice Free Corridor

In the early 1980s, modern vertebrate paleontology and geology was applied to the question. Studies showed that various portions of the 'corridor' were blocked by ice from between 30,000 to at least 11,500 BP (i.e., during and for a long while after the Last Glacial Maximum). Since sites in Alberta are less than 11,000 years old, colonization of Alberta occurred from the south, and not along the so-called ice free corridor. Further doubts about the corridor began to arise in the late 1980s when sites older than 12,000 years (such as Monte Verde, Chile) began to be discovered; and clearly, people who lived at Monte Verde could not have used an ice free corridor to get there.

The oldest site known along the corridor is in northern British Columbia: Charlie Lake Cave, where the recovery of both southern bison bone and Clovis-like projectile points suggest that these colonists arrived from the south, and not from the north.

Clovis and the Ice Free Corridor

Recent archaeological studies in eastern Beringia, as well as detailed mapping of the route of the Ice Free Corridor, have led researchers to recognize that a passable opening between the ice sheets did exist beginning circa 14,000 cal BP (ca. 12,000 RCYBP). While too late to represent a passageway for preclovis peoples, the Ice Free Corridor, renamed the "western interior corridor" or "deglaciation corridor" most likely was the route taken by Clovis hunter-gatherers, as suggested by W.A. Johnson in the 1930s.

Alternative Routes

An alternative route of colonization has been proposed along the Pacific coast, which would have been ice-free and available for migration beginning about 14,500 BP. The change of path has also affected our understanding of the earliest colonists in the Americas: rather than Clovis 'big game hunters', the earliest Americans ("pre-Clovis") are now believed to have used a broad variety of food sources, including hunting, gathering, and fishing.

Sources

The Ice Free Corridor glossary entry is part of the Guide to the Population of America and the Dictionary of Archaeology.

More details on the problems with the Ice Free Corridor hypothesis can be found in this article written in 2004 for Geotimes by Lionel E. Jackson Jr. and Michael C. Wilson.

Arnold, Thomas G. 2002 Radiocarbon Dates from the Ice-Free Corridor. Radiocarbon 44(2):437-454.

Burns, James A. 1996 Vertebrate paleontology and the alleged ice-free corridor: The meat of the matter. Quaternary International 32:107-112.

Dixon EJ. In press. Late Pleistocene colonization of North America from Northeast Asia: New insights from large-scale paleogeographic reconstructions. Quaternary International in press.

Mandryk, Carole A. S., Heiner Josenhans, Daryl W. Fedje, and Rolf W. Mathewes 2001 Late Quaternary paleoenvironments of Northwestern North America: implications for inland versus coastal migration routes. Quaternary Science Reviews 20(1-3):301-314.

You are receiving this email because you subscribed to this feed at blogtrottr.com.
If you no longer wish to receive these emails, you can unsubscribe from this feed, or manage all your subscriptions

Archaeology: What's Hot Now: Linearbandkeramik (LBK)

Archaeology: What's Hot Now
These articles that had the largest increase in popularity over the last week // via fulltextrssfeed.com
Linearbandkeramik (LBK)
Nov 21st 2011, 10:02

The Linearbandkeramik Culture (also called Bandkeramik or Linear Pottery Ceramic Culture or simply abbreviated LBK) is what German archaeologist F. Klopfleisch called the first true farming communities in central Europe, dated between about 5400 and 4900 BC. Thus, LBK is considered the first Neolithic culture in the European continent.

The word Linearbandkeramik refers to the distinctive banded decoration found on pottery vessels on sites spread throughout central Europe, from south-western Ukraine and Moldova in the east to the Paris Basin in the west. In general, LBK pottery consists of fairly simple bowl forms, made of local clay tempered with organic material, and decorated with curved and rectilinear lines incised in bands. The LBK people are considered the importers of agricultural products and methods, moving the first domesticated animals and plants from the Near East and Central Asia into Europe.

Lifestyles of the LBK

The very earliest LBK sites have loads of pottery sherds with limited evidence of agriculture or stock-breeding. Later LBK sites are characterized by longhouses with rectangular plans, incised pottery, and a blade technology for chipped stone tools. The tools include raw material of high quality flints including a distinctive "chocolate" flint from southern Poland, Rijkholt flint from the Netherlands and traded obsidian.

Domesticated crops used by the LBK culture include emmer and einkorn wheat, peas, lentils, linseed and barley. Domestic animals include cattle, sheep and goats, and occasionally a pig or two.

The LBK lived in small villages along streams or waterways characterized by large longhouses, buildings used for keeping livestock, sheltering people and providing work space. The rectangular longhouses were between 7 and 45 meters long and between 5 and 7 meters wide. They were built of massive timber posts chinked with wattle and daub mortar.

LBK cemeteries are found a short distance away from the villages, and in general are marked by single flexed burials accompanied by grave goods. However, mass burials are known at some sites, and some cemeteries are located within communities.

Chronology of the LBK

The earliest LBK sites are found in the Starcevo-Koros culture of the Hungarian plain, around 5700 BC. From there, the early LBK spreads separately east, north and west.

The LBK reached the Rhine and Neckar valleys of Germany about 5500 BC. The people spread into Alsace and the Rhineland by 5300 BC. By the mid-5th millenium BC, La Hoguette Mesolithic hunter-gatherers and LBK immigrants shared the region and, eventually, only LBK were left.

Linearbandkeramik and Violence

There seems to be considerable evidence that relationships between the Mesolithic hunter-gatherers in Europe and the LBK migrants were not entirely peaceful. Evidence for violence exists at many LBK village sites. Massacres of whole villages and portions of villages appear to be in evidence at sites such as Talheim, Schletz-Asparn, Herxheim, and Vaihingen. Mutilated remains suggesting cannibalism have been noted at Eilsleben and Ober-Hogern. The westernmost area appears to have the most evidence for violence, with about one-third of the burials showing evidence of traumatic injuries.

Further, there is a fairly high number of LBK villages that evidence some kind of fortification efforts: an enclosing wall, a variety of ditch forms, complex gates. Whether this resulted from direct competition between local hunter-gatherers and competing LBK groups is under investigation; this kind of evidence can only be partly helpful.

However, the presence of violence on Neolithic sites in Europe is under some amount of debate. Some scholars have dismissed the notions of violence, arguing that the burials and the traumatic injuries are evidence of ritual behaviors not inter-group warfare. Some stable isotope studies have noted that some mass burials are of non-local people; some evidence of slavery has also been noted.

Diffusion of Ideas or People?

One of the central debates among scholars about the LBK is whether the people were migrant farmers from the Near East or local hunter-gatherers who adopted the new techniques. Agriculture, animal and plant domestication both, originated in the Near East and Anatolia. The earliest farmers were the Natufians and Pre-Pottery Neolithic groups. Were the LBK people direct descendants of the Natufians or were they others who were taught about the agriculture? Genetic studies suggest that the LBK were genetically separate from the Mesolithic people, arguing for a migration of the LBK people into Europe, at least originally.

LBK Sites

The earliest LBK sites are located in the modern Balkan states about 5700 BC. Over the next few centuries, the sites are found in Austria, Germany, Poland, the Netherlands and eastern France.

Sources

See the photo essay on Tracing Hunting to Farming for further information.

A bibliography of the LBK has been assembled for this project.

This glossary entry is part of the Dictionary of Archaeology. Any mistakes are the responsibility of Kris Hirst.

You are receiving this email because you subscribed to this feed at blogtrottr.com.
If you no longer wish to receive these emails, you can unsubscribe from this feed, or manage all your subscriptions

Archaeology: What's Hot Now: Field Schools

Archaeology: What's Hot Now
These articles that had the largest increase in popularity over the last week // via fulltextrssfeed.com
Field Schools
Nov 21st 2011, 10:02

An archaeology field school is an archaeology dig that is organized to train the next generation of archaeologists. But even if you're not planning on becoming an archaeologist, you can still attend a field school.

If you're not a professional archaeologist, maybe you, too, think about spending part of the summer in the dirt. It doesn't seem terribly fair that we should have all the fun, does it? Well, fortunately, there are lots of university-arranged excavations going on all summer long, called field schools, and some of them take volunteers.

Attending a Field School

A field school is primarily for the training of undergraduate or graduate students. For around six or eight weeks in the summer, a small band of students is taken into the field and shown how to dig, given lectures, sometimes an exam, sometimes a project of some sort. The students get credit and training that way, starting them off in a career in archaeology. Many field schools also welcome members of the local historical society or archaeology club, or provide opportunities for the public to experience archaeology for themselves. Almost every archaeology department or anthropology department with a concentration in archaeology in the world conducts archaeological field research in schools every summer or every other summer.

To attend such a field school, you'll need stamina, clothes you don't mind destroying, a hat with a brim, and SPF 30 sunblock. You may get college credit. You may have to provide your own travel and housing expenses. You'll need a strong sense of adventure; a stronger sense of humor; and the ability to work hard without complaining (too much!). But you might have the time of your life.

So, if you have a few days or weeks this summer, and you want to experience a little real live archaeology, this is the time to start looking! A field school list has been compiled for this site; you could also go to your nearby university and find out from the archaeology or anthropology department if they are running one this summer. Good luck and good digging!

Finding a Field School

There are several ways to find a field school. Look at the listings of current archaeology digs. You could also contact the archaeologists associated with your local university department. You might consider joining your local archaeology society or club.

See the article on How to Choose a Field School for more information.

You are receiving this email because you subscribed to this feed at blogtrottr.com.
If you no longer wish to receive these emails, you can unsubscribe from this feed, or manage all your subscriptions

Archaeology: What's Hot Now: Metallurgy

Archaeology: What's Hot Now
These articles that had the largest increase in popularity over the last week // via fulltextrssfeed.com
Metallurgy
Nov 21st 2011, 10:02

Definition: Metallurgy, when used by archaeologists, is the study of the ancient processes of producing objects made of metal, including quarrying, mine construction, and smelting.

The earliest form of metallurgy was hammering copper. Native copper was first used by Old World Neolithic people beginning about the 8th millennium BC; and by New World in South American cultures beginning between 3600 and 1500 BC.

The next step, smelting (again of copper) appeared at Catal Hoyuk in Turkey, about 6000 BC; lead appears to have been added to the metal working about this same time. Mining of native materials began about 5000 BC. The earliest gold so far is from Varna in Bulgaria, about the same time. The earliest goldworking in the Americas to date is from the Jiskairumoko site of Peru, 3600 and 1500 BC.

Sources for Metallurgy

This glossary entry is a part of the Guide to the Characteristics of Ancient Civilizations, and part of the Dictionary of Archaeology. Any mistakes are the responsibility of Kris Hirst.

You are receiving this email because you subscribed to this feed at blogtrottr.com.
If you no longer wish to receive these emails, you can unsubscribe from this feed, or manage all your subscriptions

Sunday, November 20, 2011

Archaeology: What's Hot Now: Malta Temples

Archaeology: What's Hot Now
These articles that had the largest increase in popularity over the last week // via fulltextrssfeed.com
Malta Temples
Nov 20th 2011, 10:02

The Malta Temples are ancient stone structures located on Gozo and Malta, two tiny islands in the Mediterranean Sea off the south coast of Sicily. The temples are among the oldest temples in the world, the earliest of which have their initial construction phase over six thousand years ago. In all, there are about 30 temples on Malta and Gozo, and there may have been more. They are low, sprawling stone structures with between five and 20 rooms; and each temple is enclosed within a massive retaining wall and an exterior forecourt for public assembly.

  • Main Temples on Malta: Tarxien (the largest and most elaborate), Skorba, Mnajdra, Hagar Qim, Ta' Hagrat, Kordin, Bugibba, Xrobb I-Ghagin
  • Main Temples on Gozo: Ggantija (the largest and most elaborate on Gozo) Xewkija, and Ta' Marziena
  • Other important structures: Hal Saflieni Hypogeum (below-ground cavern used for burials, on Malta), Broctorff a.k.a. Xhagra Circle (stone circle, on Gozo)

Unlike what people normally think of as temples, the Malta temples are entirely curvilinear, consisting of a series of lobed spaces or apses. The earliest temples were simple, made of two or three oval rooms; they were not unlike other small ritual centers built throughout Sicily, Italy and the central Mediterranean at about the same time. But the completed temples (after a thousand years of reuse and rebuild) are massive and sprawling, with an external open space (for public gatherings?), leading to an internal courtyard and then leading from the courtyard into the private apses, the oldest parts of the temples newly refurbished.

The doorways into the temples are for the most part monumental. Archaeologists think the massive doorways were boundaries marking the interior (private) and exterior (public) parts of the temples. This separation is also marked by raised thresholds and stone paved floors, elaborate screens built to hide the interior from the exterior, and sculptured surfaces, patterns of drilled holes or spiral motifs.

Temple Exteriors

In general the outer walls of the temples form a semi-circular forecourt to the south, sometimes paved with crushed limestone paste. The outer walls are massive, built of enormous limestone blocks. In some cases, the walls are of two layers of limestone blocks filled with a rubble core. Some temples have squared-off limestone entry-ways. Many of the entry ways point to the southeast, perhaps meeting the rising sun. Some astronomical alignments have been suggested; more about that later.

Sources

See the Malta Temples bibliography for more information.

You are receiving this email because you subscribed to this feed at blogtrottr.com.
If you no longer wish to receive these emails, you can unsubscribe from this feed, or manage all your subscriptions

Archaeology: What's Hot Now: Kilwa Kisiwani

Archaeology: What's Hot Now
These articles that had the largest increase in popularity over the last week // via fulltextrssfeed.com
Kilwa Kisiwani
Nov 20th 2011, 10:02

On a small island off the coast of Tanzania lies the site of Kilwa Kisiwani, also called Kilwa (and spelled in Portuguese Quiloa), the most important of about thirty-five trading sites on the Indian Ocean during the 11th through 16th centuries AD. Archaeological investigations at the site began in earnest in 1955, and the site and its sister port Songo Mnara were named UNESCO World Heritage site in 1981.

Kilwa History

The earliest substantial occupation at Kilwa Kisiwani dates to AD 800, and the city became a major trade center from the 1100s to the early 1500s. The site was important during the Shirazi dynasty of the 11th and 12th centuries AD, and under the rule of Ali al-Hasan, a Great Mosque was built, and trade connections to southern Africa and the near and far east were established. Kilwa Kisiwani was one of the principal ports of trade on the Indian Ocean, trading gold, ivory, iron and coconuts from southern Africa, including the Mwene Mutabe south of the Zambezi River, for cloth and jewelry from India, and porcelain from China. The first gold coins struck south of the Sahara after the decline at Aksum were minted at Kilwa Kisiwani, presumably for facilitating international trade. One of them was found at the Mwene Mutabe site of Great Zimbabwe.

Kilwa and Ibn Battuta

The famous Moroccan trader Ibn Battuta visited Kilwa in 1331 during the Mahdali dynasty, when he stayed at the court of al-Hasan ibn Sulaiman Abu'l-Mawahib [ruled 1310-1333]. It was during this period that the major architectural constructions were made, including elaborations of the Great Mosque and the construction of the market complexes of Husuni Kubwa and Husuni Ndogo.

The prosperity of the port city remained intact until the last decades of the 14th century, when turmoil over the ravages of the Black Death took its toll on the international trade. By the early decades of the 15th century, new stone houses and mosques were being built up in Kilwa, but in 1500, Portuguese explorer Pedro Alvares Cabral visited Kilwa, and reported seeing houses made of coral stone, including the ruler's 100-room palace, of Islamic Middle Eastern design. Vasco da Gama arrived in 1502 and exacted tribute to the King of Portugal, and afterwards the city's importance declined, except for a brief florescence during the slave trade of the late 18th century.

Archaeological Studies at Kilwa

Archaeologists became interested in Kilwa because of two 16th century histories about the site, including the now-lost Kilwa Chronicle (although remnants of this document do still exist). Excavators in the 1950s included James Kirkman and Neville Chittick, from the British Institute in Eastern Africa. Scholars believe the Kilwa society developed into the later Swahili societies.

Sources

David Phillipson. 2005. African Archaeology: Third Edition. Cambridge University Press, London.

Mark Horton. 1998. Kilwa. In Oxford Companion to Archaeology, edited by Brian Fagan. Oxford University Press, London.

J.E.G. Sutton. 2002. The Southern Swahili Harbour and Town on Kilwa Island, 800-1800 AD: A chronology of booms and slumps. In The Development of Urbanism from a Global Perspective, an online book available at Uppsala University.

There is also a great article on the architecture and history of Kilwa on the ArchNet site.

Google Earth Placemark for Kilwa Kisiwani

You are receiving this email because you subscribed to this feed at blogtrottr.com.
If you no longer wish to receive these emails, you can unsubscribe from this feed, or manage all your subscriptions

Archaeology: What's Hot Now: African Iron Age

Archaeology: What's Hot Now
These articles that had the largest increase in popularity over the last week // via fulltextrssfeed.com
African Iron Age
Nov 20th 2011, 10:02

The African Iron Age is traditionally considered that period in Africa between the second century AD up to about 1000 AD, when iron smelting was practiced. In Africa, unlike the Europe and Asia, the Iron Age is not prefaced by a Bronze or Copper Age, but rather all the metals were brought together. The advantages of iron over stone are obvious--iron is much more efficient at cutting trees or quarrying stone than stone tools. But iron smelting technology is a smelly, dangerous one. This brief essay covers Iron Age up to the end of the first millennium AD.

Pre-Industrial Iron Ore Technology

To work iron, one must extract the ore from the ground and break it into pieces, then heat the pieces to a temperature of at least 1100 degrees centigrade under controlled conditions.

African Iron Age people built a cylindrical clay furnace and used charcoal and a hand-operated bellows to reach the level of heating for smelting. Once smelted, the metal was separated from its waste products or slag, and then brought to its shape by repeated hammering and heating, called forging.

African Iron Age Lifeways

From the 2nd century AD to about 1000 AD, the Chifumbaze spread iron throughout the largest portion of Africa, eastern and southern Africa. The Chifumbaze were farmers of squash, beans, sorghum and millet, and kept cattle, sheep, goats and chickens.

They built hill top settlements, at Bosutswe, large villages like Schroda, and large monumental sites like Great Zimbabwe. Gold, ivory, and glass bead working and trade was part of many of the societies. Many spoke a form of Bantu; many forms of geometric and schematic rock art are found throughout south and eastern Africa.

African Iron Age Time Line

  • 2nd millennium BC: West Asians invent iron smelting
  • 8th century BC: Phoenicians bring iron to North Africa (Lepcis Magna, Carthage)
  • 8th-7th century BC: First iron smelting in Ethiopia
  • 671 BC: Hyksos invasion of Egypt
  • 7th-6th century BC: First iron smelting in the Sudan (Meroe, Jebel Moya)
  • 5th century BC: First iron smelting in West Africa (Jenne-Jeno, Taruka)
  • 5th century BC: Iron using in eastern and southern Africa (Chifumbaze)
  • 4th century BC: Iron smelting in central Africa (Obobogo, Oveng, Tchissanga)
  • 3rd century BC: First iron smelting in Punic North Africa
  • 30 BC: Roman conquest of Egypt 1st century AD: Jewish revolt against Rome
  • 1st century AD: Establishment of Aksum
  • 1st century AD: Iron smelting in southern and eastern Africa (Buhaya, Urewe)
  • 2nd century AD: Heyday of Roman control of North Africa
  • 2nd century AD: Widespread iron smelting in southern and eastern Africa (Bosutswe, Toutswe, Lydenberg
  • AD 639: Arab invasion of Egypt
  • 9th century AD: Lost wax method bronze casting (Igbo Ukwu)
  • 8th century AD; Kingdom of Ghana, Kumbi Selah, Tegdaoust, Jenne-Jeno

African Iron Age Sites

African Iron Age cultures: Akan culture, Chifumbaze, Urewe

African Iron Age issues: Sirikwa Holes, Inagina: Last House of Iron, Nok Art, Toutswe Tradition

Sources

See the glossary entries for data on each site.

David Phillipson. 2005. Iron-using peoples before 1000 AD. African Archaeology, 3rd edition. Cambridge Press: Cambridge.

You are receiving this email because you subscribed to this feed at blogtrottr.com.
If you no longer wish to receive these emails, you can unsubscribe from this feed, or manage all your subscriptions