Saturday, August 27, 2011

Archaeology: What's Hot Now: Camels

Archaeology: What's Hot Now
These articles that had the largest increase in popularity over the last week // via fulltextrssfeed.com
Camels
Aug 27th 2011, 10:00

Definition:

There are two species of quadruped animal of the deserts of the world known as camel, both of which have implications for archaeology. The Bactrian (Camelus bactrianus) (two humps) resides in central Asia, while the dromedary (Camelus dromedarius) (one hump) is found in North Africa and the Near East. Camels were (and are) used for transportation, but also for their milk, dung, hair and blood, all of which were used for various purposes by nomadic pastoralists of the deserts.

Dromedaries were probably domesticated in coastal settlements along the southern Arabian peninsula somewhere between 3000 and 2500 BC. The earliest reference to camels in Arabia is the Sihi mandible, a camelid bone direct dated to ca 7100-7200 cal BC, or about 8200 RCYBP. Sihi is a Neolithic coastal site in Yemen, and the bone is probably a wild dromedary. The earliest camels in Africa are from Qasr Ibrim, Nubia, 9th century BC.

Evidence for the domestication of Bactrian camels has been found as early as 2600 BC at Shar-i Sokhta (also known as the Burnt City), Iran.

Sources

This article is part of the Guide to Animal Domestication.

Compagnoni, B. and M. Tosi, 1978. The camel: Its distribution and state of domestication in the Middle East during the third millennium B.C. in light of the finds from Shahr-i Sokhta. Pp. 119â€"128 in Approaches to Faunal Analysis in the Middle East, edited by R.H. Meadow and M.A. Zeder. Peabody Museum Bulletin no 2, Peabody Museum of Archaeology and Ethnology, New Haven, CT.

Grigson, C., J.A.J. Gowlett, and J. Zarins 1989 The Camel in Arabia: A Direct Radiocarbon Date, Calibrated to about 7000 BC. Journal of Archaeological Science 16:355-362.

Zeder, M.A., E. Emshwiller, B.D. Smith, and D.G. Bradley 2006 Documenting domestication: the intersection of genetics and archaeology. Trends in Genetics 22(3):139-155.

You are receiving this email because you subscribed to this feed at blogtrottr.com.
If you no longer wish to receive these emails, you can unsubscribe from this feed, or manage all your subscriptions

Archaeology: What's Hot Now: Hopewell Civilization

Archaeology: What's Hot Now
These articles that had the largest increase in popularity over the last week // via fulltextrssfeed.com
Hopewell Civilization
Aug 27th 2011, 10:00

Definition: The Hopewell civilization (also called Adena in some regions) is a prehistoric culture of the American middle west. Recent evidence has pretty much proven that Adena is indistinguishable from the Hopewell of the central North American continent, although there may some regional variations. Village settlements date between 500 BC-AD 200; large shaped burial mounds and extensive trade networks are Adena/Hopewell characteristics.

The Hopewell are best known for their enormous effigy mounds, built all over the American midwest, many of which fell victim to agricultural activities of the American farmer and deliberate vandalism resulting from the collapse of the lost races myth (aka, moundbuilders theory).

Sources

The Hopewell Mica Claw illustrated in the figure is courtesy the Field Museum, part of their ongoing exhibit "Ancient Americas".

Bernardini, Wesley. 2004 Hopewell geometric earthworks: a case study in the referential and experiential meaning of monuments. Journal of Anthropological Archaeology 23(3):331-356.

Caldwell, Joseph R. 1964 Hopewellian Studies. In Scientific Papers. Robert L. Hall, ed. Springfield: Illinois State Museum.

Deuel, Thorne B. 1952 The Hopewellian Community. In Hopewellian Communities in Illinois; Scientific Papers volume 5. Thorne B. Deuel, ed. Pp. 249-270. Springfield: Illinois State Museum.

Smith, Bruce D. 1988. Hopewellian farmers of Eastern North America. 11th International Congress of Pre-and Protohistoric Sciences. Smithsonian Institute, Washington, D.C.

Struever, Stuart. 1972 An analysis of the Hopewell Interaction Sphere. In Social Exchange and Interaction. In Anthropological Papers. Gail L. Houart, ed. Pp. 47-79. Ann Arbor: Museum of Anthropology, University of Michigan.

This glossary entry is part of the Dictionary of Archaeology. Any mistakes are the responsibility of Kris Hirst.

Also Known As: Adena or Adena-Hopewell

Examples:

Peter Enclosure (Kentucky), Newark Earthworks (Ohio), Serpent Mound (Ohio)

You are receiving this email because you subscribed to this feed at blogtrottr.com.
If you no longer wish to receive these emails, you can unsubscribe from this feed, or manage all your subscriptions

Archaeology: What's Hot Now: Multiregional Hypothesis

Archaeology: What's Hot Now
These articles that had the largest increase in popularity over the last week // via fulltextrssfeed.com
Multiregional Hypothesis
Aug 27th 2011, 10:00

Definition:

The Multiregional Hypothesis argues that our earliest hominid ancestors radiated out from Africa and Homo sapiens evolved from several different groups of Homo erectus in several places throughout the world.

The main proponent of the multi-regional hypothesis is Milford Wolpoff. But, growing genetic and archaeological evidence seems to suggest that of all the different evolutionary pathways, the Multiregional Hypothesis is looking less and less likely. There actually are more than three theories, but there are three main strains of the argument about how first Homo erectus and then Homo sapiens left Africa.

Leaving Africa: Three Theories

Sources

Curnoe, D. 2007 Modern human origins in Australasia: Testing the predictions of competing models. HOMOâ€"Journal of Comparative Human Biology 58:117â€"157.

Rose, Jeffrey I. 2004 The Question of Upper Pleistocene Connections between East Africa and South Arabia. Current Anthropology 45(4):551-555.

Soriano, Sylvain, Paola Villa, and Lyn Wadley 2007 Blade technology and tool forms in the Middle Stone Age of South Africa: the Howiesons Poort and post-Howiesons Poort at Rose Cottage Cave. Journal of Archaeological Science

Straus, Lawrence G. 1999 Iberia: Bridge or cul-de-sac? Implications of the Iberian record for the debate on the middle to upper paleolithic transition. Human Evolution 14(1-2):139-149.

You are receiving this email because you subscribed to this feed at blogtrottr.com.
If you no longer wish to receive these emails, you can unsubscribe from this feed, or manage all your subscriptions

Friday, August 26, 2011

Archaeology: What's Hot Now: Archaic Period

Archaeology: What's Hot Now
These articles that had the largest increase in popularity over the last week // via fulltextrssfeed.com
Archaic Period
Aug 26th 2011, 10:00

Definition:

The Archaic period is the name given to generalized hunter-gatherer societies in the American continents from approximately 8,000 to 2000 years BC.

Archaic lifestyles includes a dependence on elk, deer, and bison depending on where the site is, and a wide range of plant materials. In coastal areas, shellfish and marine mammals were important food sources, and fish weirs were an important technological advance.

Archaic Advances

Important advances of the later Archaic period include earthworks at sites such as Poverty Point and Watson Brake (both in Louisiana), and the first pottery in the Americas, a fiber-tempered ware named after Stallings Island South Carolina were an important invention. During the Altithermal, Archaic peoples dug wells to stay alive in the high plains of west Texas and eastern New Mexico.

The Archaic period people are also responsible for the domestication of such important New World plants as bottle gourd, maize and cassava, the use of which plants would flourish in later periods.

Regional Archaic

The term Archaic is quite broad, and covers an enormous area of North and South America. As a result, several regional archaic groups have been recognized.

Regional Archaic Traditions: Plains Archaic, Oshara Tradition, Maritime Archaic, Shield Archaic, Ortoiroid, Piedmont Tradition, Pinto Culture, San Dieguito, Orange Culture, Mount Albion

Archaic Period Archaeological Sites

Sources

See the Guide to the Mesolithic for information about the roughly parallel period in the Old World.

Paleoindian and Archaic Burials Bibliography

Plains Archaic Bibliography

This glossary entry is part of the Dictionary of Archaeology.

You are receiving this email because you subscribed to this feed at blogtrottr.com.
If you no longer wish to receive these emails, you can unsubscribe from this feed, or manage all your subscriptions

Archaeology: What's Hot Now: Toltec Civilization

Archaeology: What's Hot Now
These articles that had the largest increase in popularity over the last week // via fulltextrssfeed.com
Toltec Civilization
Aug 26th 2011, 10:00

Definition: The Toltec Civilization was one of three great empires of the Basin of Mexico, after the fall of Teotihuacan and before the rise of the Aztecs. The capital was at Tula, and during the Toltec heyday (about AD 900-1200), Tula controlled most of central Mexico, the Yucatan peninsula, the Gulf coast, and perhaps even Chiapas and the Pacific coast as well.

The Toltec established trade connections with people as far away as what is now the Mexican states of Zacatecas, Veracruz, and Puebla; the US states of New Mexico and Arizona; Costa Rica and Guatemala. The power of the Tula dynasties rang through all of Mesoamerica into the Aztec empire.

Sources

Smith, Michael E. and Lisa Montiel 2001 The archaeological study of empires and imperialism in pre-hispanic central Mexico. Journal of Anthropological Archaeology 20(3):245-284.

Healan, Dan M. Toltec. 2001. pp. 759-763 in Archaeology of Ancient Mexico and Central America: An Encyclopedia. Susan Toby Evans and David L. Webster, eds. Garland.

For more information on Toltec architecture, see the Walking Tour of Chichén Itzá.

This glossary entry is part of the Dictionary of Archaeology. Any mistakes are the responsibility of Kris Hirst.

Examples:

Important Toltec sites include Tula and Chichén Itzá

You are receiving this email because you subscribed to this feed at blogtrottr.com.
If you no longer wish to receive these emails, you can unsubscribe from this feed, or manage all your subscriptions

Archaeology: What's Hot Now: Toltec Civilization

Archaeology: What's Hot Now
These articles that had the largest increase in popularity over the last week // via fulltextrssfeed.com
Toltec Civilization
Aug 26th 2011, 10:00

Definition: The Toltec Civilization was one of three great empires of the Basin of Mexico, after the fall of Teotihuacan and before the rise of the Aztecs. The capital was at Tula, and during the Toltec heyday (about AD 900-1200), Tula controlled most of central Mexico, the Yucatan peninsula, the Gulf coast, and perhaps even Chiapas and the Pacific coast as well.

The Toltec established trade connections with people as far away as what is now the Mexican states of Zacatecas, Veracruz, and Puebla; the US states of New Mexico and Arizona; Costa Rica and Guatemala. The power of the Tula dynasties rang through all of Mesoamerica into the Aztec empire.

Sources

Smith, Michael E. and Lisa Montiel 2001 The archaeological study of empires and imperialism in pre-hispanic central Mexico. Journal of Anthropological Archaeology 20(3):245-284.

Healan, Dan M. Toltec. 2001. pp. 759-763 in Archaeology of Ancient Mexico and Central America: An Encyclopedia. Susan Toby Evans and David L. Webster, eds. Garland.

For more information on Toltec architecture, see the Walking Tour of Chichén Itzá.

This glossary entry is part of the Dictionary of Archaeology. Any mistakes are the responsibility of Kris Hirst.

Examples:

Important Toltec sites include Tula and Chichén Itzá

You are receiving this email because you subscribed to this feed at blogtrottr.com.
If you no longer wish to receive these emails, you can unsubscribe from this feed, or manage all your subscriptions

Archaeology: What's Hot Now: Guide to the Olmec Civilization

Archaeology: What's Hot Now
These articles that had the largest increase in popularity over the last week // via fulltextrssfeed.com
Guide to the Olmec Civilization
Aug 26th 2011, 10:00

Olmec Capitals

There are four main regions or zones that have been associated with Olmec by the use of iconography, architecture and settlement plan, including San Lorenzo de Tenochtitlan, La Venta, Tres Zapotes, and Laguna de los Cerros. Within each of these zones, there were three or four different levels of hamlets of different sizes. At the center of the zone was a fairly dense center with plazas and pyramids and kingly residences. Outside of the center were a somewhat sparser collection of hamlets and farmsteads, each at least economically and culturally tied to the center.

Olmec Kings and Rituals

Although we don't know any of the Olmec king names, we do know that the rituals associated with king included an emphasis on the sun, and reference to solar equinoxes were built into platform and plaza configurations. Sun glyph iconography is seen on many locations, and there is an undeniable importance of sunflower in dietary and ritual contexts.

The ballgame played an important role in Olmec culture, as it does in many central American societies, and, like those other societies, it may have included human sacrifice. The colossal heads are often sculpted with headgear, thought to represent ball player wear; animal effigies exist of jaguars dressed as ball players. It is possible that women also played in the games, as there are figurines from La Venta which are females wearing helmets.

Olmec Landscape

The Olmec farms and hamlets and centers were situated on and next to a diverse set of landforms, including floodplain lowlands, coastal plains, plateau uplands, and volcanic highlands. But the large Olmec capitals were based on high places in the floodplains of big rivers such as Coatzacoalcos and Tabasco.

The Olmec coped with recurring floods by building their residences and storage structures on artificially raised earth platforms, or by rebuilding on old sites, creating 'tell' formations. Many of the earliest Olmec sites are likely buried deep within the floodplains.

The Olmec were clearly interested in color and color schemes of the environment. For example, the plaza at La Venta has a striking appearance of brown soil embedded with tiny bits of shattered greenstone. And there are several blue-green serpentine mosaic pavements tiled with clays and sands in a rainbow of different colors. A common sacrificial object was a jadeite offering covered with red cinnabar.

Olmec Diet and Subsistence

By 5000 BC, the Olmec relied on domestic maize, sunflower, and manioc, later domesticating beans. They also gathered corozo palm nuts, squash, and chili. There is some possibility that the Olmec were the first to use chocolate.

The main source of animal protein was domesticated dog, but that was supplemented with white tailed deer, migratory birds, fish, turtles, and coastal shellfish. White tailed-deer in particular was specifically associated with ritual feasting.

About.com's Guide to the Olmec

You are receiving this email because you subscribed to this feed at blogtrottr.com.
If you no longer wish to receive these emails, you can unsubscribe from this feed, or manage all your subscriptions

Archaeology: What's Hot Now: Shang Dynasty of China

Archaeology: What's Hot Now
These articles that had the largest increase in popularity over the last week // via fulltextrssfeed.com
Shang Dynasty of China
Aug 26th 2011, 10:00

The Bronze Age Shang Dynasty in China is roughly dated between 1700-1050 BC, and, according to the Shi Ji, it began when the first Shang emperor, T'ang, overthrew the last of the Xia (also called Erlitou) dynasty emperors. They in turn were overthrown by the first rulers of the Zhou Dynasty, in 1046 BC.

Shang Dynasty Chronology

  • Erlitou (or Xia dynasty) 1850-1600 BC (Erlitou, Xinzhai)
  • Early Shang (Erligang) 1600-1435 BC (Erligang, Zhengzhou, Yanshi, Xingyang Dashigu, Anyang)
  • Middle Shang 1435-1220 BC (Yanshi)
  • Late Shang (Yinxu) 1220-1050 BC
Archaeological evidence for the Shang Dynasty suggests that the story is far more complex and that the use of the term 'Shang dynasty' or 'Shang civilization' is confusing, and 'Shang period' might be of more use. Settlement patterns of the Shang period include dispersed villages like Taixi, walled settlements like Gucheng and Zhengzhou, and ritual or ceremonial centers like Erlitou and Anyang.

Important advances of the Shang Dynasty are the creation of writing, on oracle bones, bones and turtle shells used to record dreams and public and private events and sacrifices. Ritual bronzes were first created at Erlitou, which may or may not represent the early part of the Shang Dynasty, depending on which scholar you listen to.

Sites of the Shang

The known capital cities of the Shang are Anyang, Ao, Bo, Yinxu and Zhengzhou; other important archaeological sites include Erlitou, Yanshi, Erligang, Zhengzhou, and Sanxingdui.

Sources

Allan, Sarah 2007 Erlitou and the Formation of Chinese Civilization: Toward a New Paradigm. The Journal of Asian Studies 66:461-496.

Campbell Roderick B. 2009. Toward a Networks and Boundaries Approach to Early Complex Polities: The Late Shang Case. Current Anthropology 50(6):821-848.

Yuan, Jing and Rowan Flad 2005 New zooarchaeological evidence for changes in Shang Dynasty animal sacrifice. Journal of Anthropological Archaeology 24(3):252-270.

Yang, Xiaoneng. 2004. Chinese Archaeology in the Twentieth Century: New Perspectives on China's Past. Yale University Press, New Haven.

You are receiving this email because you subscribed to this feed at blogtrottr.com.
If you no longer wish to receive these emails, you can unsubscribe from this feed, or manage all your subscriptions

Archaeology: What's Hot Now: Guide to the Olmec Civilization

Archaeology: What's Hot Now
These articles that had the largest increase in popularity over the last week // via fulltextrssfeed.com
Guide to the Olmec Civilization
Aug 26th 2011, 10:00

Olmec Capitals

There are four main regions or zones that have been associated with Olmec by the use of iconography, architecture and settlement plan, including San Lorenzo de Tenochtitlan, La Venta, Tres Zapotes, and Laguna de los Cerros. Within each of these zones, there were three or four different levels of hamlets of different sizes. At the center of the zone was a fairly dense center with plazas and pyramids and kingly residences. Outside of the center were a somewhat sparser collection of hamlets and farmsteads, each at least economically and culturally tied to the center.

Olmec Kings and Rituals

Although we don't know any of the Olmec king names, we do know that the rituals associated with king included an emphasis on the sun, and reference to solar equinoxes were built into platform and plaza configurations. Sun glyph iconography is seen on many locations, and there is an undeniable importance of sunflower in dietary and ritual contexts.

The ballgame played an important role in Olmec culture, as it does in many central American societies, and, like those other societies, it may have included human sacrifice. The colossal heads are often sculpted with headgear, thought to represent ball player wear; animal effigies exist of jaguars dressed as ball players. It is possible that women also played in the games, as there are figurines from La Venta which are females wearing helmets.

Olmec Landscape

The Olmec farms and hamlets and centers were situated on and next to a diverse set of landforms, including floodplain lowlands, coastal plains, plateau uplands, and volcanic highlands. But the large Olmec capitals were based on high places in the floodplains of big rivers such as Coatzacoalcos and Tabasco.

The Olmec coped with recurring floods by building their residences and storage structures on artificially raised earth platforms, or by rebuilding on old sites, creating 'tell' formations. Many of the earliest Olmec sites are likely buried deep within the floodplains.

The Olmec were clearly interested in color and color schemes of the environment. For example, the plaza at La Venta has a striking appearance of brown soil embedded with tiny bits of shattered greenstone. And there are several blue-green serpentine mosaic pavements tiled with clays and sands in a rainbow of different colors. A common sacrificial object was a jadeite offering covered with red cinnabar.

Olmec Diet and Subsistence

By 5000 BC, the Olmec relied on domestic maize, sunflower, and manioc, later domesticating beans. They also gathered corozo palm nuts, squash, and chili. There is some possibility that the Olmec were the first to use chocolate.

The main source of animal protein was domesticated dog, but that was supplemented with white tailed deer, migratory birds, fish, turtles, and coastal shellfish. White tailed-deer in particular was specifically associated with ritual feasting.

About.com's Guide to the Olmec

You are receiving this email because you subscribed to this feed at blogtrottr.com.
If you no longer wish to receive these emails, you can unsubscribe from this feed, or manage all your subscriptions

Archaeology: What's Hot Now: Archaic Period

Archaeology: What's Hot Now
These articles that had the largest increase in popularity over the last week // via fulltextrssfeed.com
Archaic Period
Aug 26th 2011, 10:00

Definition:

The Archaic period is the name given to generalized hunter-gatherer societies in the American continents from approximately 8,000 to 2000 years BC.

Archaic lifestyles includes a dependence on elk, deer, and bison depending on where the site is, and a wide range of plant materials. In coastal areas, shellfish and marine mammals were important food sources, and fish weirs were an important technological advance.

Archaic Advances

Important advances of the later Archaic period include earthworks at sites such as Poverty Point and Watson Brake (both in Louisiana), and the first pottery in the Americas, a fiber-tempered ware named after Stallings Island South Carolina were an important invention. During the Altithermal, Archaic peoples dug wells to stay alive in the high plains of west Texas and eastern New Mexico.

The Archaic period people are also responsible for the domestication of such important New World plants as bottle gourd, maize and cassava, the use of which plants would flourish in later periods.

Regional Archaic

The term Archaic is quite broad, and covers an enormous area of North and South America. As a result, several regional archaic groups have been recognized.

Regional Archaic Traditions: Plains Archaic, Oshara Tradition, Maritime Archaic, Shield Archaic, Ortoiroid, Piedmont Tradition, Pinto Culture, San Dieguito, Orange Culture, Mount Albion

Archaic Period Archaeological Sites

Sources

See the Guide to the Mesolithic for information about the roughly parallel period in the Old World.

Paleoindian and Archaic Burials Bibliography

Plains Archaic Bibliography

This glossary entry is part of the Dictionary of Archaeology.

You are receiving this email because you subscribed to this feed at blogtrottr.com.
If you no longer wish to receive these emails, you can unsubscribe from this feed, or manage all your subscriptions

Archaeology: What's Hot Now: Shang Dynasty of China

Archaeology: What's Hot Now
These articles that had the largest increase in popularity over the last week // via fulltextrssfeed.com
Shang Dynasty of China
Aug 26th 2011, 10:00

The Bronze Age Shang Dynasty in China is roughly dated between 1700-1050 BC, and, according to the Shi Ji, it began when the first Shang emperor, T'ang, overthrew the last of the Xia (also called Erlitou) dynasty emperors. They in turn were overthrown by the first rulers of the Zhou Dynasty, in 1046 BC.

Shang Dynasty Chronology

  • Erlitou (or Xia dynasty) 1850-1600 BC (Erlitou, Xinzhai)
  • Early Shang (Erligang) 1600-1435 BC (Erligang, Zhengzhou, Yanshi, Xingyang Dashigu, Anyang)
  • Middle Shang 1435-1220 BC (Yanshi)
  • Late Shang (Yinxu) 1220-1050 BC
Archaeological evidence for the Shang Dynasty suggests that the story is far more complex and that the use of the term 'Shang dynasty' or 'Shang civilization' is confusing, and 'Shang period' might be of more use. Settlement patterns of the Shang period include dispersed villages like Taixi, walled settlements like Gucheng and Zhengzhou, and ritual or ceremonial centers like Erlitou and Anyang.

Important advances of the Shang Dynasty are the creation of writing, on oracle bones, bones and turtle shells used to record dreams and public and private events and sacrifices. Ritual bronzes were first created at Erlitou, which may or may not represent the early part of the Shang Dynasty, depending on which scholar you listen to.

Sites of the Shang

The known capital cities of the Shang are Anyang, Ao, Bo, Yinxu and Zhengzhou; other important archaeological sites include Erlitou, Yanshi, Erligang, Zhengzhou, and Sanxingdui.

Sources

Allan, Sarah 2007 Erlitou and the Formation of Chinese Civilization: Toward a New Paradigm. The Journal of Asian Studies 66:461-496.

Campbell Roderick B. 2009. Toward a Networks and Boundaries Approach to Early Complex Polities: The Late Shang Case. Current Anthropology 50(6):821-848.

Yuan, Jing and Rowan Flad 2005 New zooarchaeological evidence for changes in Shang Dynasty animal sacrifice. Journal of Anthropological Archaeology 24(3):252-270.

Yang, Xiaoneng. 2004. Chinese Archaeology in the Twentieth Century: New Perspectives on China's Past. Yale University Press, New Haven.

You are receiving this email because you subscribed to this feed at blogtrottr.com.
If you no longer wish to receive these emails, you can unsubscribe from this feed, or manage all your subscriptions

Thursday, August 25, 2011

Archaeology: Most Popular Articles: Hunter Gatherers

Archaeology: Most Popular Articles
These articles are the most popular over the last month. // via fulltextrssfeed.com
Hunter Gatherers
Aug 25th 2011, 10:13

Definition:

To state it simply, hunter-gatherers hunt game and collect plant foods (called foraging) rather than grow or tend crops. Hunter gatherers is the term used by anthropologists to describe a specific kind of lifestyle, that of all human beings until the invention of agriculture about 8000 years ago.

Recent studies have identified the importance of fish and maritime resources as a component of some coastal-based hunter-gatherers. Hunter-gatherers who rely on marine resources (such as the Mesolithic Ertebølle-Ellerbeck culture are known as hunter-gatherer-fishers.

Tools of the Hunter-Gatherer

Hunter-gatherers are traditionally identified by their tools: bow and arrow, atlatl, harpoon and projectile points.

Even after agriculture became a major source of food, hunting and gathering of wild plants remained a large component of people's diets. People who tend stands of natural plants are called horticulturalists; those who farm are agriculturalists.

Up until about fifty years ago, there were a few modern hunter-gatherer societies in the world today, such as the Ainu; however, they have pretty much all been made part of the modern market economy by way of the intrusion of plastics or clothing or metal which can only be retrieved from outside sources.

Hunter-Gatherers and Domestication

Hunter-gatherers domesticated dogs, and also maize, broomcorn millet and wheat. Which came first, domesticated crop or domesticated farmer?

Compare Complex Hunter-Gatherers

Sources

There is a fabulous bibliography of hunter-gatherers maintained by J. W. Helmer; I couldn't possibly come close to his collection.

Thanks to Andy Hemmings for his update on h-g living conditions.

This glossary entry is part of the Dictionary of Archaeology. Any mistakes are the responsibility of Kris Hirst.

Also Known As: Foragers, gatherer-hunters

Alternate Spellings: Hunter-gatherer

You are receiving this email because you subscribed to this feed at blogtrottr.com.
If you no longer wish to receive these emails, you can unsubscribe from this feed, or manage all your subscriptions

Archaeology: What's Hot Now: Iceman

Archaeology: What's Hot Now
These articles that had the largest increase in popularity over the last week // via fulltextrssfeed.com
Iceman
Aug 25th 2011, 10:00

Otzi the Iceman, also called Similaun Man, Hauslabjoch Man or even Frozen Fritz, was discovered in 1991, eroding out of a glacier in the Italian Alps near the border between Italy and Austria. The human remains are of a Late Neolithic or Chalcolithic man who was died between about 3350-3300 BC. Because he ended up in a crevasse, his body was perfectly preserved by the glacier in which he was found, rather than crushed by the glacier's movements in the last 5,000 years. The remarkable level of preservation has allowed archaeologists the first detailed look into clothing, behavior, tool use and diet of the period.

So Who Was Otzi the Iceman?

The Iceman stood about 158 cm (5'2") tall, and weighed about 61 kg (134 lbs). He was rather short compared to most European males of the time, but sturdily built. He was in his mid-40s, and his strong leg muscles and overall fitness suggest that he may have spent his life herding sheep and goats up and down the Tyrolean Alps. He died about 5200 years ago, in the late spring. His health was fair for the period--he had arthritis in his joints and he had whipworm, which would have been quite painful.

Otzi had several tattoos on his body, including a cross on the inside of his left knee; six parallel straight lines arranged in two rows on his back above his kidneys, each about 6 inches long; and several parallel lines on his ankles. Some have argued that tattooing may have been some sort of acupuncture.

The Iceman's Clothing and Equipment

The Iceman carried a range of tools, weapons, and containers. An animal skin quiver contained arrow-shafts made of viburnum and hazel wood, sinews and spare points. A copper ax head with a yew haft and leather binding, a small flint knife and a pouch with a flint scraper and awl were all included in the artifacts found with him. He carried a yew bow, and researchers at first thought the man had been a hunter-gatherer by trade, but additional evidence makes it clear he was a pastoralist--a Neolithic herder.

Otzi's clothing included a belt, loincloth, and goat-skin leggings with suspenders, not unlike lederhosen. He wore a bear-skin cap, outer cape and coat made of woven grass and moccasin-type shoes made from deer and bear leather. He stuffed those shoes with moss and grasses, no doubt for insulation and comfort.

Iceman's Last Days

Otzi's stable isotopic signature suggests that he was probably born near the confluence of the Eisack and Rienz rivers of Italy, near where the town of Brixen is today, but that as an adult, he lived in the lower Vinschgau valley, not far from where he was eventually found.

The Iceman's stomach held cultivated wheat, possibly consumed as bread; game meat, and dried sloe plums. Blood traces on the stone arrow points he carried with him are from four different people, suggesting he had participated in a fight for his life.

Further analysis of the contents of his stomach and intestines have allowed researchers to describe his last two to three days as both hectic and violent. During this time he spent time in the high pastures of the Otzal valley, then walked down to the village in the Vinschgau valley. There he was involved in a violent confrontation, sustaining a deep cut on his hand. He fled back into the Tisenjoch ridge where he died.

Death of an Iceman

Before Otzi died, he had suffered two fairly serious wounds, in addition to a blow to the head. One was to his right palm, a deep cut that occurred between 3 and 8 days before his death. The other was a wound in his left shoulder. In 2001, conventional x-rays and computed tomography revealed a stone arrowhead embedded in that shoulder.

A research team led by Frank Jakobus Rühli at the Swiss Mummy Project at the University of Zurich used multislice computed tomography, a non-invasive computer scanning process used in detecting heart disease, to examine Otzi's body. They discovered a 13-mm tear in an artery within the Iceman's torso. Otzi appears to have suffered massive bleeding as a result of the tear, which eventually killed him.

Researchers believe that the Iceman was sitting in an semi-upright position when he died. Around the time he died, someone pulled the arrow shaft out of Otzi's body, leaving the arrowhead still embedded in his chest.

Sources

Otzi is currently on display in the South Tyrol Museum of Archaeology.

A bibliography of books and articles written about Otzi the Iceman has been compiled for this project.

Detailed zoom-able photographs of the iceman have been collected in the Iceman photoscan site, assembled by the Eurac, Institute for Mummies and the Iceman.

You are receiving this email because you subscribed to this feed at blogtrottr.com.
If you no longer wish to receive these emails, you can unsubscribe from this feed, or manage all your subscriptions

Archaeology: What's Hot Now: Rano Raraku (Easter Island)

Archaeology: What's Hot Now
These articles that had the largest increase in popularity over the last week // via fulltextrssfeed.com
Rano Raraku (Easter Island)
Aug 25th 2011, 10:00

Rano Raraku is one of two major quarry sites on Easter Island (Rapa Nui), where the large statues called moai were carved out of the distinctive yellow-brown volcanic tuff. Both Rano Raraku on the east and Puna Pau on the west are quarries made of geologically dormant volcanic cones.

Easter Island is best known for its moai: tall (up to 11 meters high), massive intricately carved human-shaped statues, set on carefully constructed platforms and decorated with shell-inlaid eyes and red scoria hats called pukao. The statues, all carved between about 1000 and 1600 AD, have been blamed for the ecological disaster that befell the Easter Islanders: and, more recently, as described in a 2011 book by excavators Terry Hunt and Carl Lipo, credited with the survival of the Rapanui, despite the ecological disaster that was none of their making.

Moai on Easter Island

The earliest moai on Rapa Nui were small, varied in style and form, and carved out of a variety of raw material stone types. Over time, the moai became more formalized, and two quarries became the main sources of stone for the moai construction. Located the west side of Rapa Nui island, Puna Pau was a small quarry based on a small volcanic cone. On the east side was Rano Raraku, much larger, and the source of most of the moai on all parts of the island.

Rano Raraku is a volcanic cone with a steep exterior slope and a hollow interior. Several quarry areas are carved into the exterior and interior of the cone, and approximately 160 moai still lie within the quarries, at least partly shaped. The quarry itself is not a massive excavation, but rather numerous separate quarry areas, cut and carved into the cone separately, and perhaps by separate villages or groups.

Radially extending out from Rano Raraku are several dressed roads, some with kerbstones. Although the roads were first identified in the 1910s by Katherine Routledge, at first few scholars accepted the interpretations of Routledge's features as roads. The roads were first excavated by Charles Love nearly a hundred years later. Love found that the roads appear to be U-shaped in cross-section, rather than flat, supporting Routledge's assertion that the purpose of these roads was to move moai from Rano Raraku to their final place of erection. A ritual function of the shape of these roads, and of course, of everything associated with moai carving, is certain to have been important.

Carving the Moai

Based on the evidence from the quarries, much of the moai form was carved while the rock was in place, and generally they were carved out as if they were lying in on their backs. Then the moai were detached from the parent rock, moved to the lower slopes and pushed erect, where the carving on the backs of the moai was completed. Finally, the moai were moved from the quarry along one of several roads to the places where they were to be erected permanently.

Whether the 160 or so moai left in place at the quarry were "unfinished" or not has been a point of contention among scholars as yet today. At least some of the statues at Rano Raraku were cut completely out of the quarry rock and erected onto platforms. They look unfinished, because they were buried by later quarry debris, sometimes up to their necks, but in fact, argue Richards and colleagues (2011), are not.

Sources

This glossary entry is a part of the guide to Easter Island, and the Dictionary of Archaeology.

Hunt T and Lipo C. 2011. The Statues that Walked: Unraveling the Mystery of Easter Island. Free Press: New York.

Richards C, Croucher K, Paoa T, Parish T, Tucki E, and Welham K. 2011. Road my body goes: re-creating ancestors from stone at the great moai quarry of Rano Raraku, Rapa Nui (Easter Island). World Archaeology 43(2):191-210.

Van Tilburg JA. 1995. Moving the Moai--Transporting the megaliths of Easter Island: How did they do it? Archaeology 48(1):34-43.

You are receiving this email because you subscribed to this feed at blogtrottr.com.
If you no longer wish to receive these emails, you can unsubscribe from this feed, or manage all your subscriptions

Archaeology: What's Hot Now: The Great Wall of China

Archaeology: What's Hot Now
These articles that had the largest increase in popularity over the last week // via fulltextrssfeed.com
The Great Wall of China
Aug 25th 2011, 10:00

The Great Wall of China is a masterpiece of engineering, including several chunks of massive walls extending for a hunge length of 3,700 miles (6,000 kilometers) across much of what is China. The Great Wall was begun during the Warring States period of Zhou Dynasty (ca 480-221 BC), but it was the Qin dynasty emperor Shihuangdi (he of the terracotta soldiers) who began consolidation of the walls.

You are receiving this email because you subscribed to this feed at blogtrottr.com.
If you no longer wish to receive these emails, you can unsubscribe from this feed, or manage all your subscriptions

Archaeology: What's Hot Now: Aké (Yucatan, Mexico)

Archaeology: What's Hot Now
These articles that had the largest increase in popularity over the last week // via fulltextrssfeed.com
Aké (Yucatan, Mexico)
Aug 25th 2011, 10:00

Aké is an important Maya site in northern Yucatan, around 20 miles from Mérida. The site lies within the terrains of an early 20th century henequen plant, a fiber used to produce ropes, cordage and basketry among other things. This industry was particularly prosperous in Yucatan, especially before the advent of synthetic fabrics. Some of the plant facilities are still in place, and a small church exists on top of one of the ancient mounds.

Aké was occupied for a very long time, beginning in the Late Preclassic, around 350 BC, to the Postclassic period, when the place played an important role in the Spanish conquest of Yucatan. Aké was one of the last ruins to be visited by the famous explorers Stephens and Catherwood in their last trip to Yucatan. In their book, Incident of Travels in Yucatan, they left a detailed description of its monuments.

Site Layout

The site core of Ake covers more than two hectares, and there are many more building complexes within the a dispersed residential area. Aké reached its maximum development in the Classic period, between AD 300 and 800, when the whole settlement reached an extension of four km2, and it became one of the most important Mayan center of northern Yucatan. From the site core a series of sacbeob (causeways) connected the city with other nearby centers. The largest of these, which is almost 13 meters wide and 32 kilometers long, connected Aké with the city of Izamal.

Ake's core is composed of a series of long buildings, arranged in a central plaza and bounded by a semi-circular wall. The north side of the plaza is marked by Building 1, called Building of the Columns, the most impressive construction of the site. This is a long rectangular platform, accessible from the plaza through a massive stairway, several meters wide. The top of the platform is occupied by a series of 35 columns, which would have probably supported a roof in antiquity. Sometimes called the palace, this building seems to have had a public function.

The site also includes two cenotes, one of which is near Structure 2, in the main plaza. Several other smaller sinkholes provided the community with fresh water.

Later in time, two concentric walls were constructed: one around the main plaza and a second one around the residential area surrounding it. It is unclear if the wall had a defensive function, but it certainly limited the access to the site, since the causeways, once connecting Aké to neighboring centers, were cross-cut by the construction of the wall.

Aké and the Spanish Conquest of Yucatan

Aké played an important role in the conquest of Yucatan carried out by Spanish conquistador Francisco de Montejo. Montejo arrived in Yucatan in 1527 with three ships and 400 men. He managed to conquer many Maya towns, but not without encountering a fiery resistance. At Aké, one of the decisive battles took place, where more than 1000 Maya were killed. Despite this victory, the conquest of Yucatan would be completed only after 20 years, in 1546.

Sources

This glossary entry is a part of the guide to Mesoamerica , and the Dictionary of Archaeology.

AA.VV., 2006, Aké, Yucatán, in Los Mayas. Rutas Arqueológicas, Yucatán y Quintana Roo, Arqueología Mexicana, Edición Special, N.21, p. 28.

Sharer, Robert J., 2006, The Ancient Maya. Sixth Edition. Stanford University Press, Stanford, California

You are receiving this email because you subscribed to this feed at blogtrottr.com.
If you no longer wish to receive these emails, you can unsubscribe from this feed, or manage all your subscriptions