Saturday, November 5, 2011

Archaeology: What's Hot Now: Woolley at City of Ur

Archaeology: What's Hot Now
These articles that had the largest increase in popularity over the last week // via fulltextrssfeed.com
Woolley at City of Ur
Nov 5th 2011, 10:04

Although ten of the Royal Tombs at Ur contained the remains of a central or primary individual, six of them were what Woolley called "grave pits" or "death pits" like this one. Woolley's "Grave Pits" were shafts leading down to the tombs and sunken courtyards built around the tomb or adjacent to it. The adjacent shafts and courtyards were filled with skeletons of retainers, most of them also dressed in jewels and carrying bowls.

The largest of these pits was called the Great Pit of Death, located adjacent to Queen Puabi's tomb and measuring 4 x 11.75 meters. Over seventy individuals were buried here, neatly laid out, wearing jewels and carrying bowls or cups. Bioarchaeological studies of these skeletons show that many of these people had labored hard during their lives, supporting Woolley's notion that some of these were servants, even if dressed in finery and perhaps attending a banquet on the last day of their lives.

Sources and Further Information

You are receiving this email because you subscribed to this feed at blogtrottr.com.
If you no longer wish to receive these emails, you can unsubscribe from this feed, or manage all your subscriptions

Archaeology: What's Hot Now: Archaeology Quiz: Tutankhamun's Tomb

Archaeology: What's Hot Now
These articles that had the largest increase in popularity over the last week // via fulltextrssfeed.com
Archaeology Quiz: Tutankhamun's Tomb
Nov 5th 2011, 10:04

Archaeology Quiz

Stumped? The answers can be found here:
Tutankhamun's Tomb

Thanks to Tutankhamun fan Christopher Townsend for his assistance with this puzzle

For More Games,
Visit About Archaeology's Puzzles and Games

You are receiving this email because you subscribed to this feed at blogtrottr.com.
If you no longer wish to receive these emails, you can unsubscribe from this feed, or manage all your subscriptions

Archaeology: What's Hot Now: Seriation

Archaeology: What's Hot Now
These articles that had the largest increase in popularity over the last week // via fulltextrssfeed.com
Seriation
Nov 5th 2011, 10:04

Seriation, also called artifact sequencing, is an early scientific method of relative dating, invented (most likely) by the Egyptologist Sir William Flinders Petrie in the late 19th century. Petrie's problem was that he had discovered several cemeteries along the Nile River in Egypt that seemed to be from the same period, but he needed a way to put them in chronological order. Absolute dating techniques were not available to him (radiocarbon dating wasn't invented until the 1940s); and since they were separately excavated graves, stratigraphy was no use either.

Petrie knew that styles of pottery seemed to come and go over time--in his case he noted that some ceramic urns from the graves had handles and others had just stylized ridges in the same location on similarly shaped urns. He assumed that the change in styles was an evolutionary one, and, if you could quantify that change, it might be used to indicate which cemeteries were older than others.

Petrie's notions about Egyptology, and archaeology in general, were revolutionary. His worrying about where a pot came from and what period it dated to and what that meant to the other objects buried with it were light-years away from the ideas represented in this photo dated to 1800, in which "Egyptian pots" was considered enough information for the thinking man. Petrie was a scientific archaeologist, probably close to our first example.

Sources and Further Information

See the bibliography for a list of sources and further reading.

You are receiving this email because you subscribed to this feed at blogtrottr.com.
If you no longer wish to receive these emails, you can unsubscribe from this feed, or manage all your subscriptions

Friday, November 4, 2011

Archaeology: When Did Early Modern Humans Get to Europe?

Archaeology
Get the latest headlines from the Archaeology GuideSite. // via fulltextrssfeed.com
When Did Early Modern Humans Get to Europe?
Nov 4th 2011, 13:36

Two re-analyses of hominid skeletal material from sites dated to the transition between Middle and Upper Paleolithic in Europe reported in the journal Nature on Thursday have added to the debate over when early modern humans first arrived and spread into Europe, and how much of the creative invention which marks the Upper Paleolithic can be attributed to Neanderthals.

Early Modern Humans in Europe
Early modern humans in Europe. Replicas are (left to right): St C�saire Neanderthal (France, about 38,000 years old), the Kent's Cavern maxilla (about 42,500 years old) and Mladec 1 early modern human (Czech Republic, about 35,000 years old).

The Upper Paleolithic period in Europe began about 45,000 years ago, and it is generally blamed on the entrance into Europe of early modern humans from Africa. The new arrivals brought a suite of stone and bone tools and by 40,000 years ago, that suite included a whole range of ideas and artifacts that archaeologists recognize as behavioral modernity, including the use of projectile points, collaborative hunting techniques, and personal ornamentation.

In a handful of sites (the Ch�telperronian, Uluzzian and Szeletian cultures in different parts of Europe), these types of behaviors are found in association with Neanderthals. Because the sites appeared to predate the arrival of African humans into Europe, a debate about the source of those behaviors arose. Did the Neanderthals invent modern behaviors or their own, or did they copy/borrow/imitate their new African neighbors? The new research at Kent's Cavern in the UK and Grotta del Cavallo in Italy establishes the presence of African modern humans in Europe some time before the dates of these cultures.

The research will not as yet put to bed the ideas concerning Neanderthal innovations: for one thing, the dates on many of the Ch�telperronian, Uluzzian and Szeletian sites are problematic, but it does add to the growing research on this interesting time in our prehistory.

Higham T, Compton T, Stringer C, Jacobi R, Shapiro B, Trinkaus E, Chandler B, Groning F, Collins C, Hillson S et al. 2011. The earliest evidence for anatomically modern humans in northwestern Europe. Nature advance online publication.

Benazzi S, Douka K, Fornai C, Bauer CC, Kullmer O, Svoboda J, Pap I, Mallegni F, Bayle P, Coquerelle M et al. 2011. Early dispersal of modern humans in Europe and implications for Neanderthal behaviour. Nature advance online publication.

You are receiving this email because you subscribed to this feed at blogtrottr.com.
If you no longer wish to receive these emails, you can unsubscribe from this feed, or manage all your subscriptions

Archaeology: What's Hot Now: Machu Picchu

Archaeology: What's Hot Now
These articles that had the largest increase in popularity over the last week // via fulltextrssfeed.com
Machu Picchu
Nov 4th 2011, 10:03

Machu Picchu is the name of the residential palace of the Inca Empire. The name means "Old Mountain", and it refers to one of two mountains on which Machu Picchu liesâ€"the other is Huayna Picchu (Young Mountain), located 3,000 feet above the Urubamba Valley in Peru.

Machu Picchu lies on a perennially cloud-draped ridge between the two peaks, part of the royal estate of the Inca king Pachacuti [AD 1438-1471]. The site is made up of single buildings arranged in groups, along streets, adjacent to plazas and terraces. Most of the buildings are residences, some of white granite masonry such as that seen in the city of Cuzco. Some of the buildings, which must have been built for special purposes, are partly carved into the bedrock and partly built from finely cut white granite.

Machu Picchu and Empire Building

While Machu Picchu is mostly known for its architectural beauty and its near inaccessibility, it is the empire-building career of its builder which provides a great deal of the site's importance. The Inca empire had its foundations around 1200 AD. It remained small, one of several competing regional polities, until late in the reign of the eighth Inca king, Viracocha, about 1438 AD. At that time, the Inca capital at Cuzco was attacked by the Chancas, a powerful group who lived to the north. Viracocha fled, but his son, Inca Yupanqui, refused to cede and fought his way to victory.

Machu Picchu and Pachacuti's Cataclysm

After his victory, Inca Yupanqui took the name Pachacuti (which means "cataclysm"), and began the empire building for which the Inca are renowned. His campaign of conquest and diplomacy extended Inca control out over the Central and Southern Highlands of Peru. Over the next 55 years, Pachacuti and his son Topa Inca conquered major portions of the southern coast of Peru, the northern half of Chile, northwest Argentina, and eastern Bolivia.

It was Pachacuti who began the fabulous white granite constructions in Cuzco itself as well as at Machu Picchu that are known as Inca architecture. Inca architecture, as seen in Cuzco, Ollantaytambo and Machu Picchu, is characterized by cut masonry without mortar. The faces of the stone are cut so finely that you can't insert a needle between them.

Machu Picchu 'Discovered'

The "discovery" of the site is usually ascribed to Hiram Bingham, adventurer/explorer/archaeologist/military man/state senator, who first visited the ruins in 1911; but it is pretty clear that the site was never really "lost." Bingham got a lot wrong in his book on Machu Picchu, but there is no doubt that his work in Peru brought the world's attention to the ancient culture of the Inca.

Sources

See the Walking Tour of Machu Picchu for more details about this amazing site.

This glossary entry is part of the Guide to the Inca Empire and the Dictionary of Archaeology.

A Walking Tour of Machu Picchu has been assembled for this project.

Berger, K. and et al. 1988 Radiocarbon dating Machu Picchu, Peru. Antiquity 62:707-710.

Cuadra, C., M. B. Karkee, and K. Tokeshi 2008 Earthquake risk to Inca’s historical constructions in Machupicchu. Advances in Engineering Software 39(4):336-345.

Gordon, Robert and Robert Knopf 2007 Late horizon silver, copper, and tin from Machu Picchu, Peru. Journal of Archaeological Science 34:38-47.

Shinoda, Ken-ichi, Noboru Adachi, Sonia Guillen, and Izumi Shimada 2006 Mitochondrial DNA Analysis of Ancient Peruvian Highlanders. American Journal of Physical Anthropology 131(1):98-107.

Turner, Bethany L., George D. Kamenov, John D. Kingston, and George J. Armelagos 2009 Insights into immigration and social class at Machu Picchu, Peru based on oxygen, strontium, and lead isotopic analysis. Journal of Archaeological Science 36(2):317-332.

Wright, Kenneth R., Alfredo Valencia Zegarra, and William L. Lorah 1999 Ancient Machu Picchu Drainage Engineering. Journal of Irrigation and Drainage Engineering 125(6):360-369.

You are receiving this email because you subscribed to this feed at blogtrottr.com.
If you no longer wish to receive these emails, you can unsubscribe from this feed, or manage all your subscriptions

Archaeology: What's Hot Now: Rose Cottage Cave (South Afric

Archaeology: What's Hot Now
These articles that had the largest increase in popularity over the last week // via fulltextrssfeed.com
Rose Cottage Cave (South Afric
Nov 4th 2011, 10:03

Definition:

Rose Cottage Cave is a multicomponent site located on the Caledon River in the eastern Free State region of South Africa. The cave is 20 meters (60 feet), 10 meters (30 feet) wide; its deposits are up to six meters (18 feet) deep and include evidence of its use by humans for over 100,000 years, including important Middle Stone Age (Howiesons Poort) occupations. Significant deposits at Rose Cottage Cave include both pre- and post-Howiesons Poort occupations, a possible Middle Stone Age/Late Stone Age transition occupation and a Late Stone sequence with several occupations.

Chronology was established at Rose Cottage using a combination of thermoluminesce (TL) and optically stimulated luminescence OSL methods; all numbers in the table are in thousands of years (abbreviated ka).

  • Post-Howiesons Poort 47-51 ka (TL), 33-57 ka (OSL)
  • Howiesons Poort 42-58 ka (TL), 59-66 ka (OSL)
  • Pre-Howiesons Poort 76-65 ka (TL), 86 ka (OSL)

Howiesons Poort at Rose Cottage Cave

The Howiesons Poort artifacts are a collection of blades, backed blades, flakes, triangles, and blanks primarily from fine-grained opaline (or chalcedony). Stone projectile points are considered likely to have been used as tips on arrows for bow-and-arrow hunting. Stone tool manufacturing systems appear to include marginal percussion with a soft stone hammer to make blades and bladelets.

Post-Howiesons Poort artifacts include broad, thick projectile points with facetted platforms that probably were used as spear points, rather than the HP projectiles which researchers have suggested as arrowpoints. If so, Rose Cottage Cave illustrates that rather than being different levels of sophisticated technology, bow and arrow hunting and spear hunting are complementary technologies.

Archaeological Research at Rose Cottage Cave

Rose Cottage Cave was excavated in the 1940s by B.D. Malan and by P. Beaumont in 1962. In the latter part of the 20th century, the site was investigated again by Lyn Wadley.

Sources

This glossary entry is a part of the guide to Howiesons Poort and Stillbay, and the Dictionary of Archaeology.

Mohapi M. 2007. Rose Cottage Cave MSA Lithic Points: Does Technological Change Imply Change in Hunting Techniques? The South African Archaeological Bulletin 62(185):9-18.

Soriano S, Villa P, and Wadley L. 2007. Blade technology and tool forms in the Middle Stone Age of South Africa: the Howiesons Poort and post-Howiesons Poort at Rose Cottage Cave. Journal of Archaeological Science 34(5):681-703.

Wadley L. 2005. Putting ochre to the test: replication studies of adhesives that may have been used for hafting tools in the Middle Stone Age. Journal of Human Evolution 49(5):587-601.

You are receiving this email because you subscribed to this feed at blogtrottr.com.
If you no longer wish to receive these emails, you can unsubscribe from this feed, or manage all your subscriptions

Thursday, November 3, 2011

Archaeology: What's Hot Now: Kerma (Sudan)

Archaeology: What's Hot Now
These articles that had the largest increase in popularity over the last week // via fulltextrssfeed.com
Kerma (Sudan)
Nov 3rd 2011, 10:03

Kerma is the name of a kingdom and cultural group in the Sudanese Nubia, known as Kush or Kushite to the Egyptians. Kerma grew out of the A-Group culture (or pre-Kerma) during the Egyptian Middle Kingdom (ca 2000-1600 BC).

The City of Kerma

The capital of Kerma was one of the first African urban centers, located in the Northern Dongola Reach of northern Sudan above the 3rd cataract of the Nile. Kerma was occupied between about 2500-1500 BC.

Kerma was both a political and religious capital. A large necropolis with approximately 30,000 burials is located four kilometers east of the city, including four massive royal tombs where rulers and their retainers were often buried together. These tombs are large mounds of earth and stone, called defuffas, two of which are associated with temples.

Politically, Kerma allied itself against the Egyptians with the Hyksos, and were a powerful group to be contended with.

Kerma Civilization

The Kerma culture, called Kush or Kushite by the Egyptians, was the first Nubian state, situated between the fourth and fifth cataracts of the Nile River in what is now the Sudan, between 2500 and 1500 BC. Early Kerma society was agricultural in nature and had round hut dwellings with distinctive circular tombs. Later Kerma developed into a foreign trade-based society with mud-brick architecture, dealing in ivory, diorate, and gold.

Archaeologists traditionally recognize three phases to Kerma, particularly when referring to the differences between burials.

  • Ancient Kerma, 2500-2050 BC
  • Middle Kerma, 2050-1750 BC
  • Classic Kerma 1750-1500 BC

Archaeological Research at Kerma

British archaeologist George Reisner excavated at Kerma in the first decade of the twentieth century. Recent excavations have been conducted at Kerma by the Swiss Archaeological Mission in Nubia.

Recent investigations by A.H. Thompson et al. have included stable isotope analysis of the individuals excavated from the cemetery by Reisner. These investigations have identified some evidence for status differentiation, and also suggest that Kerma was cosmopolitan, with a population made up of people from many different places.

Sources

This glossary entry is a part of the guide to Kushite Kingdom, and the Dictionary of Archaeology.

Bonnet, Charles. 1995. Archaeological Excavations at Kerma (Soudan): Preliminary report for 1993-1994 and 1994-1995 campaigns. Les fouilles archeologiques de Kerma, Extrait de Genava (new series) XLIII: I-X.

Gillis R, Chaix L, and Vigne J-D. 2011. An assessment of morphological criteria for discriminating sheep and goat mandibles on a large prehistoric archaeological assemblage (Kerma, Sudan). Journal of Archaeological Science 38(9):2324-2339.

Thompson, A. H., L. Chaix, and M. P. Richards. in press. Stable isotopes and diet at Ancient Kerma, Upper Nubia (Sudan). Journal of Archaeological Science.

You are receiving this email because you subscribed to this feed at blogtrottr.com.
If you no longer wish to receive these emails, you can unsubscribe from this feed, or manage all your subscriptions

Archaeology: What's Hot Now: Ayer Pond (Washington State, USA)

Archaeology: What's Hot Now
These articles that had the largest increase in popularity over the last week // via fulltextrssfeed.com
Ayer Pond (Washington State, USA)
Nov 3rd 2011, 10:03

Ayer Pond is a site on Orcas Island in the Strait of Juan de Fuca, Washington State in the Pacific northwest, where ~11,990 RCYBP (radiocarbon years ago) a bison died and may have been butchered. The pond is currently 1.2 hectare (3 acres) in size, and at the time the bison died in it, it was part of a post-glacial environment, dominated by open pine parkland with buffalo berry, wormwood and Sitka alder. Extinct mammals documented in the region include bison (Bison antiquus), ground sloth (Megalonyx jeffersonii) and giant short-faced bear (Arctodus simus).

The pond was excavated in 2003 by workmen using a track hoe, part of a drainage system project meant to create the pond and remove the peat. The workmen saw the bones and excavated further, eventually uncovering 98 whole bones and fragments with the lower bones partially articulated. The workmen worked carefully and removed all the bone they could find, placing it in a large cardboard box. They reported that the rib cage was largely missing; and they told researchers that there were no stone tools that they recognized. The workmen were familiar with projectile points, having found them at other locations, and they reported that there were no stone tools larger than fist-sized.

Two years later, one of the workman contacted archaeologist Stephen Kenady, who examined the bones and identified cutmarks on the bone, that could not have been created by the trackhoe. Scholarly investigation of the location of the site where the Ayer Pond bison was excavated took place in 2007, and radiocarbon dates on the bison and charcoal within the sediment confirmed its age as 11,990+/-25 RCYPB, and 800 years older than Clovis. Ayer Pond is thus pre-clovis, and one of a number of sites, like Manis Mastodon, that illustrate megafaunal hunting strategies of pre-Clovis people.

Sources

This glossary entry is a part of the guide to Pre-Clovis, and the Dictionary of Archaeology.

Fedje D, Mackie Q, Lacourse T, and McLaren D. 2011. Younger Dryas environments and archaeology on the Northwest Coast of North America. Quaternary International 242(2):452-462.

Kenady SM, Wilson MC, Schalk RF, and Mierendorf RR. 2011. Late Pleistocene butchered Bison antiquus from Ayer Pond, Orcas Island, Pacific Northwest: Age confirmation and taphonomy. Quaternary International 233(2):130-141.

You are receiving this email because you subscribed to this feed at blogtrottr.com.
If you no longer wish to receive these emails, you can unsubscribe from this feed, or manage all your subscriptions

Archaeology: What's Hot Now: Viking Settlement

Archaeology: What's Hot Now
These articles that had the largest increase in popularity over the last week // via fulltextrssfeed.com
Viking Settlement
Nov 3rd 2011, 10:03

Viking settlers lived not so much in villages, but rather on isolated, regularly spaced farmsteads surrounded by grain fields, and led by chieftainships with multiple farmsteads. In some areas, saeters, upland stations where livestock could be moved during summer seasons, were constructed, including dwellings, byres, barns, stables and other buildings associated with a year-round farmstead. This grazing method, called shieling, was part of the overall process of Norse agriculture called landnám.

A model Viking settlement had access to the sea with a reasonable boat access; a flat, reasonably well-drained area of a farmstead; and extensive grazing areas. The farming economy included barley, and domesticated sheep, goat, cattle, pig, and horse. Marine resources included seaweed, fish, shellfish and whale. Seabirds were exploited for their eggs and meat, and driftwood and peat was used to build fires and buildings.

Churches were small square buildings in the center of a circular churchyard. Dwellings, storage facilities and barns might be built of stone or stone-foundations; peat or turfs, or wood, or all three. Fuels used by the Norse included peat, peaty turf and wood; in addition for heating and building construction, much wood was used for iron smelting.

Viking Settlements

Sources

This glossary entry is a part of the Guide to Ancient Vikings and part of the Dictionary of Archaeology.

See the Viking bibliography for more research areas.

Adderley, W. P., Ian A. Simpson, and Orri Vésteinsson 2008 Local-Scale Adaptations: A Modeled Assessment of Soil, Landscape, Microclimatic, and Management Factors in Norse Home-Field Productivities. Geoarchaeology 23(4):500-527.

Barrett, James H., Roelf P. Beukens, and Rebecca A. Nicholson 2001 Diet and ethnicity during the Viking colonization of northern Scotland: Evidence from fish bones and stable carbon isotopes. Antiquity 75:145-154.

Buckland, Paul C., Kevin J. Edwards, Eva Panagiotakopulu, and J. E. Schofield 2009 Palaeoecological and historical evidence for manuring and irrigation at Garðar (Igaliku), Norse Eastern Settlement, Greenland. The Holocene 19:105-116.

Goodacre, S., et al. 2005 Genetic evidence for a family-based Scandinavian settlement of Shetland and Orkney during the Viking periods. Heredity 95:129-135.

Milner, Nicky, James Barrett, and Jon Welsh 2007 Marine resource intensification in Viking Age Europe: the molluscan evidence from Quoygrew, Orkney. Journal of Archaeological Science 34:1461-1472.

You are receiving this email because you subscribed to this feed at blogtrottr.com.
If you no longer wish to receive these emails, you can unsubscribe from this feed, or manage all your subscriptions

Wednesday, November 2, 2011

Archaeology: Thule Tradition and Climate Change

Archaeology
Get the latest headlines from the Archaeology GuideSite. // via fulltextrssfeed.com
Thule Tradition and Climate Change
Nov 2nd 2011, 10:08

An interesting article in the journal Geoarchaeology lends some evidence of the Thule tradition adapting to climate change, particularly global warming, on the Hudson Bay area in Canada.

Map of the location of Qijurittuq Site on Hudson Bay

The Thule tradition is the name archaeologists have given to the immediate ancestors of the Inuit people of the Canadian Arctic, between about AD 1 and 1600. They were hunters of walrus, seals and whales, and as you might expect, they (and their descendants) have an earned reputation for skill with bone and ivory sculpting.

The Thule folks lived in ice and snow houses (igloos) during the summer, when their lifestyles were nomadic, and in the winters, they built semi-subterranean pit houses constructed of sod and whale bone. In an article in Geoarchaeology, Anne-Marie Lemieux and her colleagues write about the site of Qijurittuq, where, during a brief warming spell between AD 970 and AD 1160, a Thule group built the more-or-less permanent village of Qijurittuq on an island near the coast of Hudson Bay.

Lemieux A-M, Bhiry N, and Desrosiers PM. 2011. The geoarchaeology and traditional knowledge of winter sod houses in eastern Hudson Bay, Canadian Low Arctic. Geoarchaeology 26(4):479-500.

You are receiving this email because you subscribed to this feed at blogtrottr.com.
If you no longer wish to receive these emails, you can unsubscribe from this feed, or manage all your subscriptions

Archaeology: What's Hot Now: Linearbandkeramik (LBK)

Archaeology: What's Hot Now
These articles that had the largest increase in popularity over the last week // via fulltextrssfeed.com
Linearbandkeramik (LBK)
Nov 2nd 2011, 10:08

The Linearbandkeramik Culture (also called Bandkeramik or Linear Pottery Ceramic Culture or simply abbreviated LBK) is what German archaeologist F. Klopfleisch called the first true farming communities in central Europe, dated between about 5400 and 4900 BC. Thus, LBK is considered the first Neolithic culture in the European continent.

The word Linearbandkeramik refers to the distinctive banded decoration found on pottery vessels on sites spread throughout central Europe, from south-western Ukraine and Moldova in the east to the Paris Basin in the west. In general, LBK pottery consists of fairly simple bowl forms, made of local clay tempered with organic material, and decorated with curved and rectilinear lines incised in bands. The LBK people are considered the importers of agricultural products and methods, moving the first domesticated animals and plants from the Near East and Central Asia into Europe.

Lifestyles of the LBK

The very earliest LBK sites have loads of pottery sherds with limited evidence of agriculture or stock-breeding. Later LBK sites are characterized by longhouses with rectangular plans, incised pottery, and a blade technology for chipped stone tools. The tools include raw material of high quality flints including a distinctive "chocolate" flint from southern Poland, Rijkholt flint from the Netherlands and traded obsidian.

Domesticated crops used by the LBK culture include emmer and einkorn wheat, peas, lentils, linseed and barley. Domestic animals include cattle, sheep and goats, and occasionally a pig or two.

The LBK lived in small villages along streams or waterways characterized by large longhouses, buildings used for keeping livestock, sheltering people and providing work space. The rectangular longhouses were between 7 and 45 meters long and between 5 and 7 meters wide. They were built of massive timber posts chinked with wattle and daub mortar.

LBK cemeteries are found a short distance away from the villages, and in general are marked by single flexed burials accompanied by grave goods. However, mass burials are known at some sites, and some cemeteries are located within communities.

Chronology of the LBK

The earliest LBK sites are found in the Starcevo-Koros culture of the Hungarian plain, around 5700 BC. From there, the early LBK spreads separately east, north and west.

The LBK reached the Rhine and Neckar valleys of Germany about 5500 BC. The people spread into Alsace and the Rhineland by 5300 BC. By the mid-5th millenium BC, La Hoguette Mesolithic hunter-gatherers and LBK immigrants shared the region and, eventually, only LBK were left.

Linearbandkeramik and Violence

There seems to be considerable evidence that relationships between the Mesolithic hunter-gatherers in Europe and the LBK migrants were not entirely peaceful. Evidence for violence exists at many LBK village sites. Massacres of whole villages and portions of villages appear to be in evidence at sites such as Talheim, Schletz-Asparn, Herxheim, and Vaihingen. Mutilated remains suggesting cannibalism have been noted at Eilsleben and Ober-Hogern. The westernmost area appears to have the most evidence for violence, with about one-third of the burials showing evidence of traumatic injuries.

Further, there is a fairly high number of LBK villages that evidence some kind of fortification efforts: an enclosing wall, a variety of ditch forms, complex gates. Whether this resulted from direct competition between local hunter-gatherers and competing LBK groups is under investigation; this kind of evidence can only be partly helpful.

However, the presence of violence on Neolithic sites in Europe is under some amount of debate. Some scholars have dismissed the notions of violence, arguing that the burials and the traumatic injuries are evidence of ritual behaviors not inter-group warfare. Some stable isotope studies have noted that some mass burials are of non-local people; some evidence of slavery has also been noted.

Diffusion of Ideas or People?

One of the central debates among scholars about the LBK is whether the people were migrant farmers from the Near East or local hunter-gatherers who adopted the new techniques. Agriculture, animal and plant domestication both, originated in the Near East and Anatolia. The earliest farmers were the Natufians and Pre-Pottery Neolithic groups. Were the LBK people direct descendants of the Natufians or were they others who were taught about the agriculture? Genetic studies suggest that the LBK were genetically separate from the Mesolithic people, arguing for a migration of the LBK people into Europe, at least originally.

LBK Sites

The earliest LBK sites are located in the modern Balkan states about 5700 BC. Over the next few centuries, the sites are found in Austria, Germany, Poland, the Netherlands and eastern France.

Sources

See the photo essay on Tracing Hunting to Farming for further information.

A bibliography of the LBK has been assembled for this project.

This glossary entry is part of the Dictionary of Archaeology. Any mistakes are the responsibility of Kris Hirst.

You are receiving this email because you subscribed to this feed at blogtrottr.com.
If you no longer wish to receive these emails, you can unsubscribe from this feed, or manage all your subscriptions

Archaeology: What's Hot Now: Qin Dynasty

Archaeology: What's Hot Now
These articles that had the largest increase in popularity over the last week // via fulltextrssfeed.com
Qin Dynasty
Nov 2nd 2011, 10:08

Definition: The Qin Dynasty [221-206 BC], while only fifteen years in duration and only including three emperors, was one of the most important and influential of periods in Chinese history. The first emperor Qin (Qin Shi Huangdi) united the "Warring Tribes," creating the rudimentary elements of a united China. Other achievements of the Qin dynasty include strengthening the Great Wall, and standardizing currency and language. The army of terra cotta soldiers also dates to the Qin dynasty; they were found in the emperor Qin Shi Huangdi's tomb. The harshness of the Qin regime led to its downfall the year after Shihuangdi's death.

Source

Xiaoneng Yang. 2004. Early Imperial China, in Chinese Archaeology in the Twentieth Century: New Perspectives on China's Past. Yale University Press, New Haven.

This glossary entry is part of the Dictionary of Archaeology. Any mistakes are the responsibility of Kris Hirst.

Alternate Spellings: Ch'in

Examples:

Xianyang (capital city)

You are receiving this email because you subscribed to this feed at blogtrottr.com.
If you no longer wish to receive these emails, you can unsubscribe from this feed, or manage all your subscriptions

Archaeology: What's Hot Now: Bent Pyramid (Egypt)

Archaeology: What's Hot Now
These articles that had the largest increase in popularity over the last week // via fulltextrssfeed.com
Bent Pyramid (Egypt)
Nov 2nd 2011, 10:08

Definition:

The Bent Pyramid is one of the Old Kingdom Pyramids at Giza, Egypt; built in the 4th Dynasty, 2680-2565 B.C. for the 4th dynasty pharaoh, Sneferu.

The pyramid is called "bent" because it changes angles at about 2/3 of the way to the top. To be precise, the lower 165 feet of the pyramid's shape is angled at 54 degrees, 31 minutes, at which point it abruptly flattens out to 43 degrees, 21 minutes.

Sneferu began his pyramid, but far too steeply, at an original angle of 60 degrees, and intended it to go to over 400 feet in height. John Romer speculates that while men were working inside the pyramid, ominous groans and cracks began to be heard. They stopped work on it, and built the Red Pyramid before returning to the Bent Pyramid, buttressing up its lower courses and adding the crown.

Source

John Romer. 2007. The Great Pyramid. Cambridge University Press, New York.

More on Egyptian Pyramids

This glossary entry is part of the Dictionary of Archaeology. Any mistakes are the responsibility of Kris Hirst.

Also Known As: Sneferu's Pyramid

You are receiving this email because you subscribed to this feed at blogtrottr.com.
If you no longer wish to receive these emails, you can unsubscribe from this feed, or manage all your subscriptions

Archaeology: What's Hot Now: Hampi: Capital of the Vijaynagara Empire

Archaeology: What's Hot Now
These articles that had the largest increase in popularity over the last week // via fulltextrssfeed.com
Hampi: Capital of the Vijaynagara Empire
Nov 2nd 2011, 10:08

The portion of Hampi now open to the public still measures some 9 square kilometers. This structure is the ruins of the Krishna bazaar at Hampi.

For more information and pictures, see:

You are receiving this email because you subscribed to this feed at blogtrottr.com.
If you no longer wish to receive these emails, you can unsubscribe from this feed, or manage all your subscriptions

Tuesday, November 1, 2011

Archaeology: Most Popular Articles: A.D. (or AD)

Archaeology: Most Popular Articles
These articles are the most popular over the last month. // via fulltextrssfeed.com
A.D. (or AD)
Nov 1st 2011, 10:30

Definition: The initials A.D. (used with or without periods) is an abbreviation for the Latin "Anno Domini", which translates to "the Year of Our Lord," referring to years after the birth of Jesus Christ. The idea to break history down in such a manner is at least old as the 6th century AD, when Victor of Tunnena established a chronology of the foundation of Rome and used what is now recognized as an incorrectly calculated birth date for Christ.

For better or worse, AD/BC is the modern calendar that most of the west (in fact, most of the world), uses. Because the term is specific to the Christian religion, however, some scholars prefer to use "C.E." instead, which means "the Common Era."

Other Common Calendar Designations

Sources

Taylor, Timothy 2008 Pehistory vs. Archaeology: Terms of Engagement. Journal of World Prehistory 2:11â€"18.

This glossary entry is part of the Guide to Calendar Designations and the Dictionary of Archaeology.

Also Known As: CE

You are receiving this email because you subscribed to this feed at blogtrottr.com.
If you no longer wish to receive these emails, you can unsubscribe from this feed, or manage all your subscriptions

Archaeology: What's Hot Now: Mixed Cropping

Archaeology: What's Hot Now
These articles that had the largest increase in popularity over the last week // via fulltextrssfeed.com
Mixed Cropping
Nov 1st 2011, 10:03

Mixed cropping, also known as inter-cropping or co-cultivation, is a type of agriculture that involves planting two or more of plants simultaneously in the same field. In general, the theory is that planting multiple crops at once will allow the crops to work together. Possible benefits of mixed cropping are to balance input and outgo of soil nutrients, to keep down weeds and insect pests, to resist climate extremes (wet, dry, hot, cold), to suppress plant diseases, to increase overall productivity and to use scarce resources to the fullest degree.

Mixed Cropping in Prehistory

Monocultural cropping is a recent invention of the industrial agricultural complex: it is thought that most agricultural field systems of the past involved some form of mixed cropping, although unambiguous archaeological evidence of this is difficult to come by. Even if archaeological evidence of multiple crops are discovered in a field, it would be difficult to differentiate between the results of mixed cropping and rotation cropping. Both methods are believed to have been used in the past.

The primary reason for prehistoric multi-cropping probably had more to do with the needs of the farmer's family, rather than any recognition that mixed cropping was a good idea. It is possible that certain plants became amenable to multicropping over time, as a result of the domestication process.

Classic Mixed Cropping: Three Sisters

The classic example of mixed cropping is that of the American "three sisters", maize, beans, and curcurbits (squash and pumpkins). These three plants, domesticated at different times, were together an important component of Native American agriculture, historically documented by the Seneca and Iroquois, and probably beginning sometime after 1000 AD. All three seeds are planted in the same hole. The maize provides a stalk for the beans to climb on, the beans are nutrient-rich to offset that taken out by the maize, and the squash grows low to the ground to keep weeds down and water from evaporating from the soil in the heat.

Modern Mixed Cropping

Agronomists studying mixed crops have had mixed results determining if yield differences can be achieved with mixed versus monoculture crops. If a combination of say, wheat and chickpeas works in one part of the world, it might not work in another. But, overall it appears that measurably good effects result, when the right combination of crops are cropped together.

Sources

This glossary entry is a part of the Guide to Ancient Farming and part of the Dictionary of Archaeology.

Daellenbach, G.C. et al. 2005. Plant productivity in cassava-based mixed cropping systems in Colombian hillside farms. Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment 105(4):595-614

Horrocks, M., et al. 2004. Microbotanical remains reveal Polynesian agriculture and mixed cropping in early New Zealand. Review of Palaeobotany and Palynology131(3-4):147-157.

Jahansooz, M.R. et al. 2007. Radiation- and water-use associated with growth and yields of wheat and chickpea in sole and mixed crops. European Journal of Agronomy 26(3): 275-282.

Sahile, Samuel et al. 2008 Effect of mixed cropping and fungicides on chocolate spot (Botrytis fabae) of faba bean (Vicia faba) in Ethiopia. Crop Protection 27(2): 275-282

You are receiving this email because you subscribed to this feed at blogtrottr.com.
If you no longer wish to receive these emails, you can unsubscribe from this feed, or manage all your subscriptions

Archaeology: What's Hot Now: Molecular Archaeology

Archaeology: What's Hot Now
These articles that had the largest increase in popularity over the last week // via fulltextrssfeed.com
Molecular Archaeology
Nov 1st 2011, 10:03

Molecular Archaeology
Back to Last Page>     Full Glossary>
 Related Terms
• Domestication
 
 
Definition: Molecular archaeology is, basically, the study of ancient molecules. Archaeological studies which include the study of ancient molecues include DNA recovered from human skeletal remains and the mummified bodies of humans; the identification of organic residues recovered from archaeological sites and objects; and tracing the progress of domestication of plants and animals through genetic research.

Also Known As: archaeological chemistry

Related Resources:

The Molecule Hunt
A book review of the Molecule Hunt by Martin Jones, from your Guide

Chemistry in Archaeology
The hard science of chemistry continues to assist archaeologists in the laboratory as they try to put together the pieces of the past.

Back to Last Page>     Full Glossary>

You are receiving this email because you subscribed to this feed at blogtrottr.com.
If you no longer wish to receive these emails, you can unsubscribe from this feed, or manage all your subscriptions

Archaeology: What's Hot Now: Scenes from Paradise

Archaeology: What's Hot Now
These articles that had the largest increase in popularity over the last week // via fulltextrssfeed.com
Scenes from Paradise
Nov 1st 2011, 10:03

Image 05.18. Mosaic of Lion, 3rd century-5th century A.D. Unknown Roman artist, found in Tunis, Tunisia. 28 7/16 x 6 13/16 in. (72.2 x 17.3 cm). Museum Collection Fund, Brooklyn Museum

This photo essay is from the 2006 exhibit at the Brooklyn Museum, which included a collection of Roman mosaics recovered from the 3rd century AD Jewish synagogue at Naro, Tunisia. The mosaics, showing natural, religious and personal images, exemplify a little-known way of life, that of wealthy Jewish citizens of the late Roman empire in Africa.

You are receiving this email because you subscribed to this feed at blogtrottr.com.
If you no longer wish to receive these emails, you can unsubscribe from this feed, or manage all your subscriptions