Thursday, July 14, 2011

Archaeology: What's Hot Now: Lascaux Cave

Archaeology: What's Hot Now
These articles that had the largest increase in popularity over the last week

Lascaux Cave
14 Jul 2011, 11:01 am

Lascaux Cave is a rockshelter in the Dordogne Valley of France with fabulous cave paintings, painted between 15,000 and 17,000 years ago. Although it is no longer open to the public, a victim of too much tourism and the encroachment of dangerous bacteria, Lascaux has been recreated, online and in replica format, so that visitors may still see the amazing paintings of the Upper Paleolithic artists.

Lascaux's Discovery

During the early fall of 1940, four teenage boys were exploring the hills above the Vézère River near the town of Montignac in the Dordogne Valley of south central France when they stumbled on an amazing archaeological discovery. A large pine tree had fallen from the hill years before and left a hole; the intrepid group slipped into the hole and fell into what is now called the Hall of the Bulls, a 20 by 5 meter (66 x 16 foot) tall fresco of cattle and deer and aurochs and horses, painted in masterful strokes and gorgeous colors some 15,000-17,000 years ago.

Lascaux Cave Art

Lascaux Cave is one of the world's great treasures. Exploration of its vast interior revealed about six hundred paintings and almost 1,500 engravings. Subject matter of the cave paintings and engravings reflect the climate of the time of their painting. Unlike older caves which contain mammoths and woolly rhinoceros, the paintings in Lascaux are birds and bison and deer and aurochs and horses, all from the warming Interstadial period. The cave also features hundreds of "signs", quadrilateral shapes and dots and other patterns we'll surely never decipher. Colors in the cave are blacks and yellows, reds and whites, and were produced from charcoal and manganese and ocher and iron oxides, which were probably recovered locally and do not appear to have been heated prior to their use.

Restorations at Lascaux Cave

Sadly, or perhaps inevitably, the beauty of Lascaux drew tremendous numbers of tourists by the late 1950s, and the size of the traffic endangered the paintings. The cave was closed to the public in 1963. In 1983, a replica of the Hall of the Bulls was opened, and it is there that most tourists go.

The original paintings have been restored, and we are tremendously fortunate that one of the first websites on the Internet was the Lascaux Cave siteâ€"in fact, it was the first web site I ever saw, back in 1994 or so. Today it is a marvel of wonderful graphics-enhanced information, truly one of my favorite web sites. Loads of pictures from each of the rooms; pictures of the boys as they are today and history and archaeological information as well. The discussion of the deterioration of Lascaux in 1963 and what the French government did to create a replica is particularly interesting. A time line illustrates Lascaux's place in time within the collection of known Paleolithic cave art sites, and active links on the line take you to Cosquer, Chauvet, La Ferassie, Cap Blanc and other caves in the Dordogne valley.

In 2009, the French government opened a new webpage for Lascaux. It features a video walk through of the cave, so you really get a feel for the warm, womb-like cave. A haunting sound track and extremely detailed views of each of the large panels are also available. It is even more spectacular than the original, and that's saying quite a bit.

Recent Research at Lascaux

Recent research on Lascaux has included some investigations of the hundreds of bacteria which have formed in the cave. Because it was air conditioned for decades, and then treated biochemically to reduce mold, many pathogens have made a home in the cave, including the bacillus for Legionnaire's disease. It is unlikely that the cave will ever be opened to the public again.

Lascaux's web sites are fully realized in French, Spanish, German, and English, and a real treat to visit. The website is a true innovation on the part of the French government, both conserving one of the world's most treasured art galleries and permitting untold numbers of visitors to see it. Even if we can never get into Lascaux Cave, there's two wonderful web sites to let us get a taste of the work of the masters of Paleolithic cave art.

Sources

This glossary entry is a part of the Guide to Parietal (Cave) Art and part of the Dictionary of Archaeology.

Bastian, Fabiola, Claude Alabouvette, and Cesareo Saiz-Jimenez 2009 Bacteria and free-living amoeba in the Lascaux Cave. Research in Microbiology 160(1):38-40.

Chalmin, Emilie, et al. 2004 Les blasons de Lascaux. L'Anthropologie 108(5):571-592.

Delluc, Brigitte and Gilles Delluc 2006 Art paléolithique, saisons et climats. Comptes Rendus Palevol 5(1-2):203-211.

Vignaud, Colette, et al. 2006 Le groupe des « bisons adossés » de Lascaux. Étude de la technique de l'artiste par analyse des pigments. L'Anthropologie 110(4):482-499.

You are receiving this email because you subscribed to this feed at blogtrottr.com.

If you no longer wish to receive these emails, you can unsubscribe from this feed.

Archaeology: What's Hot Now: Have Trowel, Part I

Archaeology: What's Hot Now
These articles that had the largest increase in popularity over the last week

Have Trowel, Part I
14 Jul 2011, 11:01 am

Have Trowel, Will Travel, the Series

Shovel Bum. Dig Bum. Hobo Field Crew. That was me, once upon a time. Some of my happiest days in archaeology were when I was poor and just getting started, making the rounds as hobo field crew. It's how many of us get started, and certainly how many of us become educated in the ways of archaeology, and it can be a rewarding and hideous experience at the same time.

Here's how it works. Every excavation needs field hands. There may be one or two professional archaeologists running the show, but most or all of the labor involved in the diggings is done by the hired help. The hired help may be voluntary, if the excavation or survey is run by a historical society; they may have to be enrolled students if it's an academic project; they may even be expected to pay, if it's an EarthWatch project. But particularly in the U.S., Canada, and the U.K., many archaeological projects are federally funded projects, the result of legislation protecting each country's cultural resources. In the United States, for example, federally funded projects such as interstate highway, dam, and park construction all require some level of archaeological inspection prior to the construction. These projects generate lots of field crew jobs.

Field crew jobs can last for a few days to several years in length. If the project is a survey, you may find yourself walking cultivated fields for days, searching the ground for artifacts. You may be asked to wield a shovel or even a clam-shell type post-hole digger (high tech equipment) to excavate small test holes. You may use a bucket auger post-hole digger to excavate small very deep holes. If the project is an excavation or several excavations, you may lay out square test units, excavate them with shovels and/or trowels, squeeze the soil through a 1/4 in hardware cloth. You may take notes, draw maps, excavate dark stains in the dirt. You may even help run a transit and stadia rod to create topographic maps. You may learn digital mapping with GPS/GIS. You may learn how to take botanical or radiocarbon samples without contaminating them.

The words "never a dull moment" do not really apply here, because a lot of dull moments occur in archaeology. But the work changes most of the time, and there's always something new to learn.

More of Have Trowel, Will Travel, the Series

You are receiving this email because you subscribed to this feed at blogtrottr.com.

If you no longer wish to receive these emails, you can unsubscribe from this feed.

Archaeology: What's Hot Now: Banana History

Archaeology: What's Hot Now
These articles that had the largest increase in popularity over the last week

Banana History
14 Jul 2011, 11:01 am

Bananas (Musa spp) are a tropical crop, and a staple in the wet tropic areas of Africa, the Americas, mainland and island Southeast Asia, South Asia, Melanesia and the Pacific islands. Perhaps 87% of the total bananas consumed worldwide today are locally consumed; the rest is distributed outisde of the wet tropical regions in which they are grown. Today there are hundreds of fully domesticated banana varieties, and an uncertain number are still in various stages of domestication: that is to say, they still are inter-fertile with wild populations.

Bananas are basically giant herbs, rather than trees, and there are approximately 50 species in the Musa genus, which includes the edible forms of bananas and plantains. The genus is split into four or five sections, based on the number of chromosomes in the plant, and the region where they are found. Furthermore, over a thousand different types of cultivars of bananas and plantains are recognized today. The different varieties are characterized by wide differences in peel color and thickness, flavor, fruit size, and resistance to disease. The bright yellow one found most frequently in western markets is called the Cavendish.

Bananas produce vegetative suckers at the base of the plant which can be removed and planted separately. Bananas are planted at a typical density of between 1500-2500 plants per square hectare. Between 9-14 months after planting, each plant produces some 20-40 kilograms of fruit. After the harvest, the plant is cut down, and one sucker is allowed to grow up to produce the next crop.

Studying Banana History

Bananas are difficult to study archaeologically, and so the domestication history was unknowable until recently. Banana pollen, seeds and pseudostem impressions are quite rare or absent at archaeological sites, and much of the recent research has been focused on the relatively new technologies associated with opal phytoliths, basically silicon copies of cells created by the plant itself.

Banana phytoliths are uniquely shaped: they are volcaniform, shaped like little volcanoes with a flat crater at the top. There are differences in the phytoliths between varieties of bananas; but variations between wild and domesticated versions are not as yet definitive, so additional forms of research need to be used to fully understand banana domestication.

Genetics and linguistic studies also help in understanding banana history. Diploid and triploid forms of bananas have been identified, and their distribution throughout the world is a key piece of evidence. In addition, linguistic studies of local terms for bananas support the notion of the spread of the banana away from its point of origin: island southeast Asia.

Banana Domestication and Dispersal

Exploitation of early wild forms of bananas has been noted at the Beli-Lena site of Sri Lanka by c 11,500-13,500 BP, Gua Chwawas in Malaysia by 10,700 BP, and Poyang Lake, China by 11,500 BP. Kuk Swamp, in Papua New Guinea, so far the earliest unequivocal evidence for banana cultivation, had wild bananas there throughout the Holocene, and banana phytoliths are associated with the earliest human occupations at Kuk Swamp, between ~10,220-9910 cal BP.

Bananas have been cultivated and hybridized a number of times over several thousand years, so we'll concentrate on the original domestication, and leave the hybridization to botanists. All edible bananas today are hybridized from Musa acuminata (diploid) or M. acuminata crossed with M. balbisiana (triploid). Today, M. acuminata is found throughout mainland and island southeast Asia including the eastern half of the Indian subcontinent; M. balbisiana is mostly found in mainland southeast Asia. Genetic changes from M. acuminata created by the domestication process include the suppression of seeds and the development of parthenocarpy: the ability of humans to create a new crop without the need for fertilization.

Archaeological evidence from the Kuk Swamp of the highlands of New Guinea indicates that bananas were deliberately planted by at least as long ago as 5000-4490 BC (6950-6440 cal BP). Additional evidence indicates that Musa acuminata ssp banksii F. Muell was dispersed out of New Guinea and introduced into eastern Africa by ~3000 BC (Munsa and Nkang), and into south Asia (the Harappan site of Kot Diji) by 2500 cal BC, and probably earlier.

Read more about:

The earliest banana evidence found in Africa is from Munsa, a site in Uganda dated to 3220 cal BC, although there are problems with the stratigraphy and chronology. The earliest well-supported evidence is at Nkang, a site located in southern Cameroon, which contained banana phytoliths dated between 2,750 to 2,100 BP.

Like coconuts, bananas were most widely spread as a result of the sea exploration of the Pacific by Lapita peoples ca 3000 BP, of extensive trade voyages throughout the Indian Ocean by Arab traders, and of exploration of the Americas by Europeans.

Sources

Much of Volume 7 of the Ethnobotany Research & Applications is dedicated to banana research, and it is all free to download.

This glossary entry is a part of the guide to Plant Domestication, and the Dictionary of Archaeology.

Ball T, Vrydaghs L, Van Den Hauwe I, Manwaring J, and De Langhe E. 2006. Differentiating banana phytoliths: wild and edible Musa acuminata and Musa balbisiana. Journal of Archaeological Science 33(9):1228-1236.

De Langhe E, Vrydaghs L, de Maret P, Perrier X, and Denham T. 2009. Why Bananas Matter: An introduction to the history of banana domestication. Ethnobotany Research & Applications 7:165-177. Open Access

Denham T, Fullagar R, and Head L. 2009. Plant exploitation on Sahul: From colonisation to the emergence of regional specialisation during the Holocene. Quaternary International 202(1-2):29-40.

Denham TP, Harberle SG, Lentfer C, Fullagar R, Field J, Therin M, Porch N, and Winsborough B. 2003. Origins of Agriculture at Kuk Swamp in the Highlands of New Guinea. Science 301(5630):189-193.

Donohue M, and Denham T. 2009. Banana (Musa spp.) Domestication in the Asia-Pacific Region: Linguistic and archaeobotanical perspectives. Ethnobotany Research & Applications 7:293-332. Open Access

Heslop-Harrison JS, and Schwarzacher T. 2007. Domestication, Genomics and the Future for Banana. Annals of Botany 100(5):1073-1084.

Lejju BJ, Robertshaw P, and Taylor D. 2006. Africa's earliest bananas? Journal of Archaeological Science 33(1):102-113.

Pearsall DM. 2008. Plant domestication. In: Pearsall DM, editor. Encyclopedia of Archaeology. London: Elsevier Inc. p 1822-1842.

Perrier X, De Langhe E, Donohue M, Lentfer C, Vrydaghs L, Bakry F, Carreel F, Hippolyte I, Horry J-P, Jenny C et al. 2011. Multidisciplinary perspectives on banana (Musa spp.) domestication. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences Early Edition.

You are receiving this email because you subscribed to this feed at blogtrottr.com.

If you no longer wish to receive these emails, you can unsubscribe from this feed.

Wednesday, July 13, 2011

Archaeology: Most Popular Articles: Terracotta Army

Archaeology: Most Popular Articles
These articles are the most popular over the last month.

Terracotta Army
13 Jul 2011, 11:13 am

The exquisite terracotta army of the first Qin Dynasty ruler Shihuangdi represents the emperor’s ability to control the resources of the newly unified China, and his attempt to recreate and maintain that empire in the afterlife. The soldiers are part of Shihuangdi's tomb, located near the modern town of Xi'an, Shaanxi province in China.

The first emperor of all China was a fellow named Ying Zheng, born in 260 BC during the "Warring States Period", a chaotic, fierce, and dangerous time in Chinese history. He was a member of the Qin dynasty, and ascended to the throne in 247 BC at the age of twelve and a half. In 221 BC King Zheng united all of what is now China and renamed himself Qin Shihuangdi ("First Emperor of Qin"), although ‘united’ is rather a tranquil word to be using for the bloody conquest of the region’s small polities. According to the Shiji records of the Han dynasty court historian Sima Qian, Qin Shihuangdi was a phenomenal leader, who began connecting existing walls to create the first version of the Great Wall of China, constructed an extensive network of roads and canals throughout his empire, standardized written language and money, and abolished feudalism, establishing in its place provinces run by civilian governors. Qin Shihuangdi died in 210 BC, and the Qin dynasty was quickly extinguished within a few years by the early members of the Han dynasty. But, during the brief period of Shihuangdi’s rule, a remarkable testament to his control of the countryside and its resources was constructed: a semi-subterranean mausoleum complex and an army of 7,000 life-size sculpted clay terracotta soldiers, chariots, and horses.

Terracotta Army and Shihuangdi's Necropolis

Shihuangdi’s necropolis was surely large enough to merit the name of city of death. The outer wall of the mausoleum precinct measured 2100 x 975 meters and enclosed administrative buildings, horse stables and cemeteries; the heart of the precinct was the 500x500 meter tomb for Shihuangdi. Found in the precinct were ceramic and bronze sculptures, including cranes, horses, chariots, stone carved armor for humans and horses, and human sculptures that archaeologists have interpreted as representing officials and acrobats. The three pits containing the now-famous terracotta army are located 600 meters east of the mausoleum precinct, in a farm field where they were re-discovered by a well-digger in the 1920s.

The mausoleum precinct was built beginning shortly after Zheng became king, in 246 BC, and construction continued until about 209 BC. Four pits were excavated to hold the terracotta army, although only three were filled by the time construction ceased. The construction of the pits included excavation, placement of a brick floor, and construction of a sequence of rammed earth partitions and tunnels. The floors of the tunnels were covered with mats, the life-sized statuary was placed erect on the mats and the tunnels were covered with logs. Finally each pit was buried. In the largest pit (14,000 square meters), the infantry was placed in rows four deep. Pit 2 includes a U-shaped layout of chariots, cavalry and infantry; and Pit 3 contains a command headquarters. Only about 1,000 soldiers have been excavated so far; archaeologists estimate that there are over 7,000 soldiers (infantry to generals), 130 chariots with horses, and 110 cavalry horses.

The statues of the infantry soldiers range between 5 foot 8 inches and 6 foot 2 inches; the commanders are 6 and half feet tall. The lower half of the kiln-fired ceramic bodies were made of solid terracotta clay, the upper half hollow. It is evident that the statues were vividly painted including a color called Chinese purple; although most of that paint has flown, traces of it may be seen on some of the statues.

Chinese excavations have been conducted at Shihuangdi’s mausoleum complex since 1974, and have included excavations in and around the mausoleum complex; they continue to reveal astonishing findings. As Xiaoneng Yang describes Shihuangdi’s mausoleum complex, “Ample evidence demonstrates the First Emperor’s ambition: not only to control all aspects of the empire during his lifetime but to recreate the entire empire in microcosm for his after life.”

Sources

Hu, Ya-Qin, et al. 2007 What can pollen grains from the Terracotta Army tell us? Journal of Archaeological Science 341153-1157.

Liu, Z., et al. 2007 Influence of Taoism on the invention of the purple pigment used on the Qin terracotta warriors. Journal of Archaeological Science 34(11):1878-1883.

Xiaoneng Yang. 2004. “Mausoleum of the First Emperor of the Qin Dynasty and its Terracotta Army Pits at Lishan and Xiyang, Lintong, Shaanxi Province.” In Chinese Archaeology in the Twentieth Century: New Perspectives on China's Past, Volume 2, pp 225-229. Yale University Press, New Haven, Connecticut.

More on the Terracotta Army

See the terracotta army photo essay.

Pollen and the Terracotta Army describes how pollen has helped identify where the various terracotta sculptures were made.

Chinese purple is a manufactured pigment used on the soldiers.

Stan Parchin, Senior Museum Correspondent for Art History, reports that replicas of the terracotta soldiers currently reside in the public lobby of an office building on Fifth Avenue and East 53rd Street in Manhattan. England just executed a cultural agreement with China, and some of the terracotta figures will be featured soon as part of a special exhibition in London.

You are receiving this email because you subscribed to this feed at blogtrottr.com.

If you no longer wish to receive these emails, you can unsubscribe from this feed.

Archaeology: What's Hot Now: Horses

Archaeology: What's Hot Now
These articles that had the largest increase in popularity over the last week

Horses
13 Jul 2011, 11:01 am

The modern domesticated horse (Equus caballus) is today spread throughout the world and among the most diverse creatures on the planet. In North America, the horse was part of the megafaunal extinctions at the end of the Pleistocene, but not, for some reason, in Europe. Two wild subspecies survived until recently, the Tarpan (Equus ferus ferus, died out ca 1919) and Przewalski's Horse (Equus ferus przewalskii, of which there are a few left).

Horse history, especially the timing of the domestication of the horse, is still being debated, partly because the evidence for domestication itself is debatable. But interestingly, genetics seems to suggest a single event of domestication. Unlike other animals, criteria such as changes in body morphology (horses are extremely diverse) or the location of a particular horse outside of its "normal range" (horses are very widespread) are not useful in helping resolve the question.

Horse History and the Evidence for Horse Domestication

The earliest possible hints for domestication would be the presence of what appear to be a set of postmolds with lots of animal dung within the area defined by the posts, representing a horse pen. That evidence has been found at Krasni Yar in Kazakhstan, beginning about 5000 BC. The horses may have been kept for food and milk, rather than riding or load-bearing.

Accepted archaeological evidence of horseback riding includes bit wear on horse teeth-that has been found in the steppes east of the Ural mountains at Botai and Kozhai 1 in modern Kazakhstan, around 3500-3000 BC. The bit wear was only found on a few of the teeth in the archaeological assemblages, which might suggest that a few horses were ridden to hunt and collect wild horses for food and milk consumption. Finally, the earliest direct evidence of the use of horses as beasts of burden-in the form of drawings of horse-drawn chariots-is at about 2000 BC, in Mesopotamia.

Horse History and Genetics

Genetic data, interestingly enough, has traced all extant domesticated horses to one founder stallion, or to closely related male horses with the same Y haplotype. At the same time, there is a high matrilineal diversity in both extant and wild horses. At least 77 wild mares would be required to explain the diversity of the mtDNA in current horse populations, which probably means quite a few more.

New Evidence

In a paper published in Science on March 6, 2009, Alan K. Outram and colleagues looked at three strands of evidence supporting horse domestication at Botai culture sites: shin bones, milk consumption, and bitwear. These data support domestication of the horse between about 3000-3500 BC sites in what is today Kazakhstan.

Horses skeletons at Botai Culture sites have gracile metacarpals. The horses' metacarpals-the shins or cannon bones-are used as key indicators of domesticity. For whatever reason (and I won't speculate here), shins on domestic horses are thinner-more gracile-than those of wild horses. Outram et al. describe the shinbones from Botai as being closer in size and shape to those of Bronze age (fully domesticated) horses compared to wild horses.

Fatty lipids of horse milk were found inside of pots. Although today it seems a bit weird to westerners, horses were kept for both their meat and milk in the past-and still are in the Kazakh region as you can see from the photograph above. Evidence of horse milk was found at Botai in the form of fatty lipid residues on the insides of ceramic vessels.

Bit wear is in evidence on horse teeth. Finally, researchers noted bitting wear on horses' teeth-a vertical strip of wear on the outside of horses' premolars, where the metal bit damages the enamel when it sits between the cheek and tooth.

White Horses and History

White horses have had a special place in ancient history-according to Herodotus, they were held as sacred animals in the Achaemenid court of Xerxes the Great (ruled 485-465 BC).

White horses are associated with the Pegasus myth, the unicorn in the Babylonian Arabian horse, Lipizzaner stallion, Shetland pony, and Icelandic pony populations.

Sources

For information on white horses, see White Horses and Genetics and More about White Horses.

This article is part of the Guide to the History of Animal Domestication.

Brown, D. and D. Anthony 1998 Bit Wear, Horseback Riding and the Botai Site in Kazakhstan. Journal of Archaeological Science 25(4):331-347.

Cassidy, R. 2009 The horse, the Kyrgyz horse and the 'Kyrgyz horse'. Anthropology Today 25(1):12-15.

Jansen, T., et al. 2002 Mitochondrial DNA and the origins of the domestic horse. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 99 (16):10905-10910.

Levine, M. A. 1999 Botai and the origins of horse domestication. Journal of Anthropological Archaeology 18(1):29-78.

Ludwig, A., et al. 2009 Coat Color Variation at the Beginning of Horse Domestication. Science 324:485.

Kavar, T. and P. Dovc 2008 Domestication of the horse: Genetic relationships between domestic and wild horses. Livestock Science 116(1-3):1-14.

Outram, A. K., et al. 2009 The Earliest Horse Harnessing and Milking. Science 323:1332-1335.

Rosengren Pielberg, G., et al. 2008 A cis-acting regulatory mutation causes premature hair graying and susceptibility to melanoma in the horse. Nature Genetics 40:1004-1009.

You are receiving this email because you subscribed to this feed at blogtrottr.com.

If you no longer wish to receive these emails, you can unsubscribe from this feed.

Archaeology: What's Hot Now: Mesolithic

Archaeology: What's Hot Now
These articles that had the largest increase in popularity over the last week

Mesolithic
13 Jul 2011, 11:01 am

The Mesolithic (or "middle stone") period is traditionally that time period in the Old World between the last glaciation at the end of the Paleolithic (~12,000 years ago) and the beginning of the Neolithic (~7000 years ago), when farming communities began to be established.

During the first three thousand years of what scholars recognize as the Mesolithic, a period of climatic instability made life very interesting in Europe, with gradual warming abruptly switching to 1200 years of very cold dry weather called the Younger Dryas. By 9000 BC, the climate had stabilized to close to what it is today. During the Mesolithic, humans learned to hunt in groups and to fish, and began to learn how to domesticate animals and plants.

Climate Change and the Mesolithic

The retreat of the Pleistocene glaciers, a steep rise in sea levels, and the extinction of megafauna (large-bodied animals) were accompanied by a growth in forests and a major redistribution of animals and plants. After the climate stabilized, people moved northward into previously glaciated areas, and adopted new subsistence methods. Hunters targeted medium-bodied animals like red and roe deer, aurochs, elk, sheep, goat and ibex. Marine mammals, fish and shellfish were heavily used in coastal areas, and huge shell middens are associated with Mesolithic sites along the coasts throughout Europe and the Mediterranean. Plant resources such as hazelnuts, acorns and nettles became an important part of Mesolithic diets.

Mesolithic Technology

During the Mesolithic period, humans began the first steps in land management. Swamps and wetlands were purposely burned, and chipped and ground stone axes were used to cut down trees for fires, and for constructing living quarters and fishing vessels.

Stone tools were made from microlithsâ€"tiny chips of stone made from blades or bladelets and set into toothed slots in bone or antler shafts. Tools made of composite materialâ€"bone, antler, wood combined with stoneâ€"were used to create a variety of harpoons, arrows, and fish hooks. Nets and seines were developed for fishing and trapping small game.

Boats and canoes were constructed, and the first wooden tracks to cross wetlands were built. Pottery and ground stone tools were first made during the Late Mesolithic, although they didn't come into prominence until the Neolithic.

Settlement Patterns of the Mesolithic

Mesolithic hunter-gatherers moved seasonally, following animal migrations and plant changes. In many areas, large permanent or semi-permanent communities were located on the coast, with smaller temporary hunting camps were located further inland.

Mesolithic houses had sunken floors, which varied in outline from round to rectangular, and were built of wooden posts around a central hearth.

Mesolithic Art and Ritual Behaviors

Decidedly unlike the predecessor Upper Paleolithic art, Mesolithic art is geometric, with a restricted range of colors, dominated by the use of red ochre. Other art objects include painted pebbles, ground stone beads, pierced shells and teeth, and amber. Star Carr has some red deer antler headdresses.

The Mesolithic period saw the first small cemeteries; the largest so far discovered are at Skateholm, with 65 interments. Burials varied: some inhumations, some cremations, some highly ritualized "skull nests" associated with evidence of large-scale violence. Some of the burials included grave goods, tools, jewelry, shells, and animal and human figurines; goods that archaeologists suggest are evidence of the emergence of social stratification.

The first megalithic tombsâ€"collective burial places constructed of large stone blocksâ€"were constructed at the end of the Mesolithic period. The oldest of these are in the Upper Alentejo region of Portugal and along the Brittany coast; they were constructed between 4700-4500 BC.

Warfare in the Mesolithic

By the end of the Mesolithic, ~5000 BC, a very high percentage of skeletons recovered from Mesolithic burials show evidence of violence: 44% in Denmark; 20% in Sweden and France. Archaeologists suggest that the violence arose towards the end of the Mesolithic because of social pressure resulting from competition for resources, as Neolithic farmers vied with hunter-gatherers over rights to land.

Sources

This entry is a part of the Guide to European Prehistory, and the Dictionary of Archaeology.

Bailey G. 2007. Archaeological Records: Postglacial Adaptations. In: Scott AE, editor. Encyclopedia of Quaternary Science. Oxford: Elsevier. p 145-152.

Cunliffe, Barry. 2008. Europe between the Oceans, 9000 BC-AD 1000. Yale University Press.

Peterkin GL. 2008. European, Northern and Western: Mesolithic Cultures In: Pearsall DM, editor. Encyclopedia of Archaeology. New York: Academic Press. p 1249-1252.

Price, TD 1989 The reconstruction of Mesolithic diets. In The Mesolithic in Europe. C. Bonsall, ed. p. 48-59. John Donald Publishers, Edinburgh.

Spikins P. 2008. Mesolithic Europe: glimpses of another world. In: Spikins P, and Bailey G, editors. Mesolithic Europe. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. p 1-17.

You are receiving this email because you subscribed to this feed at blogtrottr.com.

If you no longer wish to receive these emails, you can unsubscribe from this feed.

Archaeology: What's Hot Now: Iceman

Archaeology: What's Hot Now
These articles that had the largest increase in popularity over the last week

Iceman
13 Jul 2011, 11:01 am

Otzi the Iceman, also called Similaun Man, Hauslabjoch Man or even Frozen Fritz, was discovered in 1991, eroding out of a glacier in the Italian Alps near the border between Italy and Austria. The human remains are of a Late Neolithic or Chalcolithic man who was died between about 3350-3300 BC. Because he ended up in a crevasse, his body was perfectly preserved by the glacier in which he was found, rather than crushed by the glacier's movements in the last 5,000 years. The remarkable level of preservation has allowed archaeologists the first detailed look into clothing, behavior, tool use and diet of the period.

So Who Was Otzi the Iceman?

The Iceman stood about 158 cm (5'2") tall, and weighed about 61 kg (134 lbs). He was rather short compared to most European males of the time, but sturdily built. He was in his mid-40s, and his strong leg muscles and overall fitness suggest that he may have spent his life herding sheep and goats up and down the Tyrolean Alps. He died about 5200 years ago, in the late spring. His health was fair for the period--he had arthritis in his joints and he had whipworm, which would have been quite painful.

Otzi had several tattoos on his body, including a cross on the inside of his left knee; six parallel straight lines arranged in two rows on his back above his kidneys, each about 6 inches long; and several parallel lines on his ankles. Some have argued that tattooing may have been some sort of acupuncture.

The Iceman's Clothing and Equipment

The Iceman carried a range of tools, weapons, and containers. An animal skin quiver contained arrow-shafts made of viburnum and hazel wood, sinews and spare points. A copper ax head with a yew haft and leather binding, a small flint knife and a pouch with a flint scraper and awl were all included in the artifacts found with him. He carried a yew bow, and researchers at first thought the man had been a hunter-gatherer by trade, but additional evidence makes it clear he was a pastoralist--a Neolithic herder.

Otzi's clothing included a belt, loincloth, and goat-skin leggings with suspenders, not unlike lederhosen. He wore a bear-skin cap, outer cape and coat made of woven grass and moccasin-type shoes made from deer and bear leather. He stuffed those shoes with moss and grasses, no doubt for insulation and comfort.

Iceman's Last Days

Otzi's stable isotopic signature suggests that he was probably born near the confluence of the Eisack and Rienz rivers of Italy, near where the town of Brixen is today, but that as an adult, he lived in the lower Vinschgau valley, not far from where he was eventually found.

The Iceman's stomach held cultivated wheat, possibly consumed as bread; game meat, and dried sloe plums. Blood traces on the stone arrow points he carried with him are from four different people, suggesting he had participated in a fight for his life.

Further analysis of the contents of his stomach and intestines have allowed researchers to describe his last two to three days as both hectic and violent. During this time he spent time in the high pastures of the Otzal valley, then walked down to the village in the Vinschgau valley. There he was involved in a violent confrontation, sustaining a deep cut on his hand. He fled back into the Tisenjoch ridge where he died.

Death of an Iceman

Before Otzi died, he had suffered two fairly serious wounds, in addition to a blow to the head. One was to his right palm, a deep cut that occurred between 3 and 8 days before his death. The other was a wound in his left shoulder. In 2001, conventional x-rays and computed tomography revealed a stone arrowhead embedded in that shoulder.

A research team led by Frank Jakobus Rühli at the Swiss Mummy Project at the University of Zurich used multislice computed tomography, a non-invasive computer scanning process used in detecting heart disease, to examine Otzi's body. They discovered a 13-mm tear in an artery within the Iceman's torso. Otzi appears to have suffered massive bleeding as a result of the tear, which eventually killed him.

Researchers believe that the Iceman was sitting in an semi-upright position when he died. Around the time he died, someone pulled the arrow shaft out of Otzi's body, leaving the arrowhead still embedded in his chest.

Sources

Otzi is currently on display in the South Tyrol Museum of Archaeology.

A bibliography of books and articles written about Otzi the Iceman has been compiled for this project.

Detailed zoom-able photographs of the iceman have been collected in the Iceman photoscan site, assembled by the Eurac, Institute for Mummies and the Iceman.

You are receiving this email because you subscribed to this feed at blogtrottr.com.

If you no longer wish to receive these emails, you can unsubscribe from this feed.