Thursday, December 29, 2011

Archaeology: What's Hot Now: Horticulture

Archaeology: What's Hot Now
These articles that had the largest increase in popularity over the last week // via fulltextrssfeed.com
Horticulture
Dec 29th 2011, 11:00

Definition:

Horticulture is a process by which a plot of soil is prepared for the planting of seeds, tubers, or cuttings. It is tended to control competition from intrusive plants (weeds), and protected from predatory animals including humans. The crop is harvested, processed, and usually stored in specialized containers or structures. Some produce, often significant a quantity, is eaten during the growing season, but an important element is having the wherewithal to store food for future consumption, trade or ceremonies. Sharing food remains a crucial element of many, if not most, human ceremonies.

Horticulture and Gardening

A garden, being a more or less permanent location, forces those who tend and harvest the garden to settle down in its vicinity. Garden produce has value, so a group of humans must cooperate to the extent that they can protect themselves and their produce from those who would rather steal it. It is telling that many of the earliest horticulturalists also lived in fortified communities. There is safety in numbers, and there is safety in walls. The notion of "peaceful horticulturalists" is a myth of wishful thinking.

Settling down in a community does not lead to gardening -- gardening leads to settling down in communities. You can't take it with you.

Michael Scullin, ethnohorticulturalist

This glossary entry is a part of the Guide to Ancient Farming and part of the Dictionary of Archaeology.

Also Known As: Gardening

You are receiving this email because you subscribed to this feed at blogtrottr.com.
If you no longer wish to receive these emails, you can unsubscribe from this feed, or manage all your subscriptions

Archaeology: What's Hot Now: Jericho (Palestine)

Archaeology: What's Hot Now
These articles that had the largest increase in popularity over the last week // via fulltextrssfeed.com
Jericho (Palestine)
Dec 29th 2011, 11:00

Jericho (also called Tell es-Sultan) is the name of a tell situated on an ancient lake bed plain in what is known as the West Bank, Palestine. The oval tell has between 8 and 12 meters of occupation fill, and it covers an area of about 2.5 hectares. The city that the tell represents is one of oldest continuously occupied (more or less) locations on the planet.

The most widely known occupation at Jericho is of course, the Judeo-Christian Bronze Age one--Jericho is mentioned in both old and new testaments of the bible. However, the oldest occupations at Jericho in fact much earlier than that, dating to the Natufian period (ca. 10,500-9,300 years before the present), and it has a substantial Pre-Pottery Neolithic (8300-7300 BC) occupation as well.

Jericho's reputation in the bible has a strong association with towers and walls--and with good reason. The first walls at Jericho were built during the Pre-Pottery Neolithic A (PPNA) period, indicating that violence and conflict were important parts of Jericho's history for a very long time. Another important feature of Jericho is plastered skulls, human skulls on which faces have been modeled in plaster and then buried buried beneath floor houses. Plastered skulls are a known trait from PPNB sites, such as Kfar HaHoresh, Beidha, Çatalhöyük and Beisamoun, and similar eerie statuary at 'Ain Ghazal.

Jericho Chronology

  • Natufian (10,800-8,500 BC), sedentary hunter-gatherers in large semi-subterranean oval stone structures
  • Pre-Pottery Neolithic A (8,500-7300 BC), roofed, oval semi-subterranean dwellings in a village, engaging in long distance trade and growing domesticated crops, construction of the first tower (4 meters tall), and a defensive perimeter wall
  • Pre-Pottery Neolithic B (7300-6000 BC), rectangular houses with red- and white-painted floors, with caches of plastered human skulls
  • Early Neolithic (6000-5000 BC) Jericho was mostly abandoned during this time
  • Middle/Late Neolithic (5000-3100 BC), very minimal occupation
  • Early / Middle Bronze Age (3100-1800 BC) (extensive defensive walls constructed, rectangular towers 15-20 meters long and 6-8 meters tall and extensive cemeteries
  • Late Bronze Age (1800-1400 BC), Jericho destroyed
  • After the Late Bronze Age, Jericho was no longer much of a center, but continued to be occupied on a small scale, and ruled by Babylonians, Persian Empire, Roman Empire, Byzantine and Ottoman Empire, on and on until the present day

Jericho and Archaeology

Jericho was recognized as the biblical site a very long time ago indeed, with comments from the "Pilgrim of Bordeaux" in AD 333.

Among the archaeologists who have worked at Jericho are Carl Watzinger, Ernst Sellin, Kathleen Kenyon and John Garstang.

Sources

This glossary entry is a part of the Guides to the Pre-Pottery Neolithic, and Biblical Archaeology, as well as part of the Dictionary of Archaeology. Any mistakes are the responsibility of Kris Hirst.

Barlett, John R. 1982. Sites of the Biblical World: Jericho. Lutterworth Press, Surrey, England.

Blau, Soren 2006 An Analysis of Human Skeletal Remains from two Middle Bronze Age Tombs from Jericho. Palestine Exploration Quarterly 138(1):13-26.

Broshi, Magen 2007 Date Beer and Date Wine in Antiquity. Palestine Exploration Quarterly 139(1):55-59.

Fletcher, Alexandra, Jessica Pearson, and Janet Ambers 2008 The Manipulation of Social and Physical Identity in the Pre-Pottery Neolithic: Radiographic Evidence for Cranial Modification at Jericho and its Implications for the Plastering of Skulls. Cambridge Archaeological Journal 18(3):309â€"325.

Goren, Yuval, A. N. Goring-Morris, and Irena Segal 2001 The technology of skull modelling in the Pre-Pottery Neolithic B (PPNB): Regional variability, the relation of technology and iconography and their archaeological implications. Journal of Archaeological Science 28:671-690.

Naveh, Danny 2003 PPNA Jericho: a Socio-political Perspective. Cambridge Archaeological Journal 13:83-96.

You are receiving this email because you subscribed to this feed at blogtrottr.com.
If you no longer wish to receive these emails, you can unsubscribe from this feed, or manage all your subscriptions

Archaeology: What's Hot Now: Hibabiya (Jordan)

Archaeology: What's Hot Now
These articles that had the largest increase in popularity over the last week // via fulltextrssfeed.com
Hibabiya (Jordan)
Dec 29th 2011, 11:00

Hibabiya (sometimes spelled Habeiba) is the name of the ruins of an early Islamic village, which was located atop the basalt bedrock outcrop immediately adjacent to the Qa Hibabiya mudflat at the fringe of the northeastern desert in what is today Jordan. Pottery collected from the site during its earliest investigations dates to the Late Byzantine-Umayyad [AD 661-750] and/or Abbasid [AD 750-1250] periods of the Islamic Civilization.

The site was largely destroyed by a large quarrying operation in 2008: but examination of documents and artifact collections created in a handful of investigations in the 20th century has allowed scholars to redate the site and place it in context with the newly burgeoning study of Islamic history. A report of the site appeared in the journal Arabian Archaeology and Epigraphy in 2011 (Kennedy 2011).

Architecture at Hibabiya

The earliest publication of the site (Rees 1929) describes it as a fishing village with several rectangular houses, and a series of fishtraps jutting into the mudflat. Additional analysis of aerial photos taken then and in the 1950s indicates there were at least 30 individual houses scattered along the edge of the mudflat for a length of some 750 meters (2460 feet), most with between two to six rooms. Several of the houses included interior courtyards, and a few of those were very large, the largest of which measured approximately 40x50 m (130x165 ft). Henry Field, who visited the site in the 1920s, argued that the largest structure was possibly a Roman (or Byzantine) fort.

Investigating Hibabiya

Hibabiya was discovered in 1921 by Royal Air Force pilots flying on a new airmail route across the northeastern desert of Jordan and Iraq. In 1929, Group Captain L.W.B. Rees published an article on the sites the RAF had identified in their flyovers in one of the first issues of the journal Antiquity, which included an aerial photograph of Hibabiya. The site was visited by archaeologist Henry Field in 1927 and 1928; OGS Crawford published his analysis of the site's pottery in the 1930s. A.N. Garrard and N.P. Stanley-Price investigated the site during a survey of sites in the region in the 1970s, but intensive investigations at the site itself (or in the region for that matter) were not performed.

Most of the site of Hibabiya was destroyed by an immense rock quarry and archaeological evidence of all but one of the structures is gone. Investigations of the collected artifacts and historical photographs were conducted by a group from the University of Western Australia, led by David Kennedy.

Kennedy reassessed the interpretation of the site as a "fishing village". He identified what Rees called "fish-traps" as walled gardens, which were built to exploit annual flooding events as irrigation. The location between the Azraq Oasis and the Umayyad/Abbasid site of Qasr el-Hallabat suggested to Kennedy that the site location was probably on a migration route used by nomadic pastoralists. Kennedy argues that Hibabiya was likely a village that was seasonally populated by pastoralists, who took advantage of the grazing opportunities and opportunistic farming possibilities on annual migrations. Numerous desert kites have been identified in the region, lending support to this hypothesis.

The Roman fort hypothesis is possible, says Kennedy: the favorable location of Hibabiya might have enticed the Romans (or more properly, Byzantine, ca 4th-7th centuries AD) to set up a fort here; but it was not the focal point of the village, which would have developed well after the Romans had left.

Sources

This glossary entry is a part of the guide to Islamic Civilization, and the Dictionary of Archaeology.

Kennedy D. 2011. Recovering the past from above Hibabiya â€" an Early Islamic village in the Jordanian desert? Arabian Archaeology and Epigraphy 22(2):253-260.

Kennedy D. 2011. The "Works of the Old Men" in Arabia: remote sensing in interior Arabia. Journal of Archaeological Science 38(12):3185-3203.

Rees LWB. 1929. The Transjordan Desert. Antiquity 3(12):389-407.

You are receiving this email because you subscribed to this feed at blogtrottr.com.
If you no longer wish to receive these emails, you can unsubscribe from this feed, or manage all your subscriptions

Wednesday, December 28, 2011

Archaeology: Recumbent Stone Circles

Archaeology
Get the latest headlines from the Archaeology GuideSite. // via fulltextrssfeed.com
Recumbent Stone Circles
Dec 28th 2011, 11:06

While I was updating my article on solstice photos of Stonehenge, I ran across a handful of articles about an interesting subset of megalithic monuments called recumbent stone circles (or RSC for short).

Old Keig Recumbent Stone Circle, Aberdeenshire, Scotland
Old Keig, Aberdeenshire, Scotland. Photo by Stu Smith

Scholars investigating the thousands of stone circles and megalithic monuments in Europe noticed a recurring pattern restricted to two areas: northeastern Scotland and southwestern Ireland. The pattern involves a large flat rectangular block, each end marked by a pillar stone. Researchers interpret this specific alignment as associated with Late Neolithic/Early Bronze Age (ca 2,500-1500 BC) ritual ceremonies involved with tracking the movement of the moon in the sky.

Recent excavations during this last decade have revealed that, like most other megalithic monuments, recumbent stone circles (abbreviated RSC) were a later stage in what was centuries or millennia long periods of building and rebuilding.

You are receiving this email because you subscribed to this feed at blogtrottr.com.
If you no longer wish to receive these emails, you can unsubscribe from this feed, or manage all your subscriptions

Archaeology: Most Popular Articles: Discovery of Fire

Archaeology: Most Popular Articles
These articles are the most popular over the last month. // via fulltextrssfeed.com
Discovery of Fire
Dec 28th 2011, 11:12

The discovery of fire, or, more precisely, the controlled use of fire was, of necessity, one of the earliest of human discoveries. Fire's purposes are multiple, some of which are to add light and heat, to cook plants and animals, to clear forests for planting, to heat-treat stone for making stone tools, to burn clay for ceramic objects.

Discovery of Fire

The controlled use of fire was an invention of the Early Stone Age (or Lower Paleolithic). The earliest evidence for controlled use of fire is at the Lower Paleolithic site of Gesher Benot Ya'aqov in Israel, where charred wood and seeds were recovered from a site dated 790,000 years ago.

Not everybody believes that; the next oldest site is at Zhoukoudian, a Lower Paleolithic site in China dated to about 400,000 BP, and at Qesem Cave (Israel), between about 200,000-400,000 years ago.

In a paper published in Nature in March 2011, Roebroeks and Villa report their examinations of the available data for European sites and conclude that habitual use of fire wasn't part of the human (meaning early modern and Neanderthal both) suite of behaviors until ca. 300,000 to 400,000 years ago. They argue that the earlier sites are representative of opportunistic use of natural fires.

Hearth Fire Construction

As opposed to fire, a hearth is a deliberately constructed fireplace. The earliest fireplaces were made by collecting stones to contain the fire, or simply reusing the same location again and again and allowing the ash to act as hearth construct. Those are found in the Middle Paleolithic period (ca 200,000-40,000 years ago, at sites such as Klasies River Caves (South Africa, 125,000 years ago) and Tabun Cave (at Mt. Carmel, Israel)

Earth ovens, on the other hand, are hearths with banked and sometimes domed structures built of clay. These types of hearths were first used during the Upper Paleolithic (ca 40,000-20,000 years BP), for cooking, heating and, sometimes, to burn clay figurines to hardness. The Gravettian Dolni Vestonice site in the modern Czech Republic has evidence of kiln construction, although construction details did not survive. The best information on Upper Paleolithic kilns is from the Aurignacian deposits of Klisoura Cave in Greece (ca 32,000-34,000 years ago).

Fuels

Although relict wood may have been the original fuel, other sources became important in various places with limited wood supply. In places with scarce wood resources, timber and branch wood for structures, furnishing and tools would have cut back the amount used for fuel. If wood was not available, alternative fuels such as peat, cut turf, animal dung, animal bone, seaweed, and straw and hay. Techniques for discriminating fuel from ashy remains are outlined in the Church et al. paper listed below.

But of course, everyone knows that Prometheus stole fire from the gods, the Greek myth as reported by our Ancient History guide.

Sources

This definition is part of the Guide to the Lower Paleolithic.

More information on the clay hearths is available at the Klisoura Cave glossary entry.

Church, M. J., C. Peters, and C. M. Batt 2007 Sourcing Fire Ash on Archaeological Sites in the Western and Northern Isles of Scotland, Using Mineral Magnetism. Geoarchaeology 22(7):747-774.

Goudsblom, J. 2004 Fire, human use, and consequences. In International Encyclopedia of the Social & Behavioral Sciences. Neil J. Smelser and Paul B. Baltes, eds. Pp. 5672-5676. London: Elsevier.

Goren-Inbar, Naama, et al. 2004 Evidence of Hominin Control of Fire at Gesher Benot Ya'aqov, Israel. Science 304(5671):725-727.

Karkanas, P., et al. The earliest evidence for clay hearths: Aurignacian features in Klisoura Cave 1, southern Greece. Antiquity 78(301):513-525.

Karkanas, Panagiotis, et al. 2007 Evidence for habitual use of fire at the end of the Lower Paleolithic: Site-formation processes at Qesem Cave, Israel. Journal of Human Evolution 53(2):197-212.

Roebroeks W, and Villa P. 2011. On the earliest evidence for habitual use of fire in Europe. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences Early Edition:1-6.

You are receiving this email because you subscribed to this feed at blogtrottr.com.
If you no longer wish to receive these emails, you can unsubscribe from this feed, or manage all your subscriptions

Archaeology: What's Hot Now: Mohenjo-daro (Pakistan)

Archaeology: What's Hot Now
These articles that had the largest increase in popularity over the last week // via fulltextrssfeed.com
Mohenjo-daro (Pakistan)
Dec 28th 2011, 11:01

Mohenjo-daro (also spelled Mohanjo-Daro and translated as "Mound of Mohan"; or Moenjo-daro "Mound of the Dead") is an important Indus civilization site, located in the Sindh province of Pakistan in the floodplain of the Indus River. The site is the largest of the known Indus cities, extending over an area of some 250 hectares, and its Indus occupations lasted between about 2600-1900 BC.

The site is one of the best-preserved of the Indus civilization sites, with structures made primarily of fired adobe brick. Mohenjo-daro was first occupied about 3500 BC, and it was continuously occupied until between 1700 and 1300 BC, although the site was likely not completely abandoned until long after the Harappan occupation was ended.

The people at Mohenjo-daro manufactured seals and beads, and worked copper, carved shell and ivory, and produced and stone tools. Stone carvings of seated male figures may represent ancestral leaders of the community, and may not in fact represent priests or kings despite such names as "priest king". Many other figurines, in the form of human and animal figurines were produced at Mohenjo-daro of terracotta, bronze, faience and shell.

Archaeological Ruins at Mohenjo-daro

The most prominent mound on the site is called the citadel; it measures 6.6 hectares in area and was surrounded by a fortified wall with a large brick gateway in the southeast corner.

Excavations at Mohenjo-daro in the region of the citadel mound identified a large colonaded building with a specially designed water tank called 'the Great Bath'. South of the Great Bath is a massive building with solid brick foundations called 'the Granary' which probably operated as a large meeting place rather than for storage.

Mohenjo-daro Research

Mohenjo-Daro was first discovered in 1922 by R.D. Banerji. Large-scale excavations were undertaken JOhn Marshall, K.N. Dikshit, Ernest Mackay and others throughout the 1930s; the most recent was conducted by G.F. Dales in the 1950s.

Sources

The best place to read more about Mohenjo-daro is on the Harappa site, including several articles illustrated by an abundance of photos, from J. Mark Kenoyer.

You are receiving this email because you subscribed to this feed at blogtrottr.com.
If you no longer wish to receive these emails, you can unsubscribe from this feed, or manage all your subscriptions

Archaeology: What's Hot Now: African Iron Age

Archaeology: What's Hot Now
These articles that had the largest increase in popularity over the last week // via fulltextrssfeed.com
African Iron Age
Dec 28th 2011, 11:01

The African Iron Age is traditionally considered that period in Africa between the second century AD up to about 1000 AD, when iron smelting was practiced. In Africa, unlike the Europe and Asia, the Iron Age is not prefaced by a Bronze or Copper Age, but rather all the metals were brought together. The advantages of iron over stone are obvious--iron is much more efficient at cutting trees or quarrying stone than stone tools. But iron smelting technology is a smelly, dangerous one. This brief essay covers Iron Age up to the end of the first millennium AD.

Pre-Industrial Iron Ore Technology

To work iron, one must extract the ore from the ground and break it into pieces, then heat the pieces to a temperature of at least 1100 degrees centigrade under controlled conditions.

African Iron Age people built a cylindrical clay furnace and used charcoal and a hand-operated bellows to reach the level of heating for smelting. Once smelted, the metal was separated from its waste products or slag, and then brought to its shape by repeated hammering and heating, called forging.

African Iron Age Lifeways

From the 2nd century AD to about 1000 AD, the Chifumbaze spread iron throughout the largest portion of Africa, eastern and southern Africa. The Chifumbaze were farmers of squash, beans, sorghum and millet, and kept cattle, sheep, goats and chickens.

They built hill top settlements, at Bosutswe, large villages like Schroda, and large monumental sites like Great Zimbabwe. Gold, ivory, and glass bead working and trade was part of many of the societies. Many spoke a form of Bantu; many forms of geometric and schematic rock art are found throughout south and eastern Africa.

African Iron Age Time Line

  • 2nd millennium BC: West Asians invent iron smelting
  • 8th century BC: Phoenicians bring iron to North Africa (Lepcis Magna, Carthage)
  • 8th-7th century BC: First iron smelting in Ethiopia
  • 671 BC: Hyksos invasion of Egypt
  • 7th-6th century BC: First iron smelting in the Sudan (Meroe, Jebel Moya)
  • 5th century BC: First iron smelting in West Africa (Jenne-Jeno, Taruka)
  • 5th century BC: Iron using in eastern and southern Africa (Chifumbaze)
  • 4th century BC: Iron smelting in central Africa (Obobogo, Oveng, Tchissanga)
  • 3rd century BC: First iron smelting in Punic North Africa
  • 30 BC: Roman conquest of Egypt 1st century AD: Jewish revolt against Rome
  • 1st century AD: Establishment of Aksum
  • 1st century AD: Iron smelting in southern and eastern Africa (Buhaya, Urewe)
  • 2nd century AD: Heyday of Roman control of North Africa
  • 2nd century AD: Widespread iron smelting in southern and eastern Africa (Bosutswe, Toutswe, Lydenberg
  • AD 639: Arab invasion of Egypt
  • 9th century AD: Lost wax method bronze casting (Igbo Ukwu)
  • 8th century AD; Kingdom of Ghana, Kumbi Selah, Tegdaoust, Jenne-Jeno

African Iron Age Sites

African Iron Age cultures: Akan culture, Chifumbaze, Urewe

African Iron Age issues: Sirikwa Holes, Inagina: Last House of Iron, Nok Art, Toutswe Tradition

Sources

See the glossary entries for data on each site.

David Phillipson. 2005. Iron-using peoples before 1000 AD. African Archaeology, 3rd edition. Cambridge Press: Cambridge.

You are receiving this email because you subscribed to this feed at blogtrottr.com.
If you no longer wish to receive these emails, you can unsubscribe from this feed, or manage all your subscriptions