Thursday, September 29, 2011

Archaeology: What's Hot Now: Oasis Theory

Archaeology: What's Hot Now
These articles that had the largest increase in popularity over the last week // via fulltextrssfeed.com
Oasis Theory
Sep 29th 2011, 10:00

Definition:

The Oasis Theory (or Propinquity Theory) is a core concept in archaeology, referring to one of the main hypotheses about the origins of agriculture. First put forward by V.G. Childe in his 1928 book, "The Most Ancient Near-East", the oasis theory argues that the reason people starting living in settlements was because during a dry spell, the only livable place was near oases.

The enforced clustering of humans, animals, and plants led to the domestication of all three, or so the theory goes. Another important scholar for this discussion was Robert Braidwood, who introduced the Fertile Crescent as a location of this enormous step forward (or backward, depending on your point of view).

More Information

Lots of details on the domestication of various animals and plants have been collected here.

Braidwood, Robert J., et al. 1974 Beginnings of Village-Farming Communities in Southeastern Turkey--1972. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 71(2):568-572. Free download

Childe, V.G. 1969 New Light on the Most Ancient East. Norton & Company. The second edition, which can be had for a song these days.

Pluciennik, Mark and Marek Zvelbil. 2007. pp. 467-486 in Handbook of Archaeological Theories, R. Alexander Bentley, Herbert D.G. Maschner and Christopher Chippindale, eds. Altamira Press, Lanham, Maryland. A great resource for modern concepts of the origins of agriculture.

This glossary entry is part of the Dictionary of Archaeology. Any mistakes are the responsibility of Kris Hirst.

Also Known As: Propinquity Theory

You are receiving this email because you subscribed to this feed at blogtrottr.com.
If you no longer wish to receive these emails, you can unsubscribe from this feed, or manage all your subscriptions

Archaeology: What's Hot Now: Emperor Qin's Terracotta Army

Archaeology: What's Hot Now
These articles that had the largest increase in popularity over the last week // via fulltextrssfeed.com
Emperor Qin's Terracotta Army
Sep 29th 2011, 10:00

Each of the pits discovered at Shihuangdi's tomb were excavated by the emperor's workers, who first placed a brick floor, and then built a sequence of rammed earth partitions and tunnels. The floors of the tunnels were covered with mats, the life-sized statuary was placed erect on the mats and the tunnels were covered with logs. Finally each pit was buried. In the largest pit (14,000 square meters), the infantry was placed in rows four deep.

You are receiving this email because you subscribed to this feed at blogtrottr.com.
If you no longer wish to receive these emails, you can unsubscribe from this feed, or manage all your subscriptions

Archaeology: Most Popular Articles: Map of the Dead Sea Caves

Archaeology: Most Popular Articles
These articles are the most popular over the last month. // via fulltextrssfeed.com
Map of the Dead Sea Caves
Sep 29th 2011, 10:13

The location of the caves where the scrolls were found is within the rugged cliffs on the western shore of the salty Dead Sea. In the midst of the caves is the archaeological site of Qumran, thought by most scholars to be a settlement for the Jewish religious sect who wrote and kept the Dead Sea Scrolls.

The site of Qumran was first visited by Europeans in 1851, when a Flemish explorer named Louis-Felicien Caignart de Saulcy took an expedition to the Dead Sea, and visited Ein Feshkha, and Khirbet Qumran. The site is built of mud brick and cut and uncut stone, a cemetery containing about 1,000 graves. The name Qumran is from the nearby riverbed, called Wadi Qumran, and may be derived from the Arabic word for 'moonlight'. Qumran's ancient name was Secacah, one of six desert towns mentioned in the Old Testament book of Joshua.

In the mid 1940s, bedouin pastoralists discovered a cache of scrolls in what was to be later named Cave 1, located about a half mile from the site of Qumran. Additional caves were identified throughout the 1950s, with the last cave (Cave 11) discovered in 1956. Some of the scrolls had been stored in jars within the caves--these scrolls are in the best shape. Others were apparently stored on wooden shelves and these have been badly fragmented over time.

Primary Source

For More Information

You are receiving this email because you subscribed to this feed at blogtrottr.com.
If you no longer wish to receive these emails, you can unsubscribe from this feed, or manage all your subscriptions

Wednesday, September 28, 2011

Archaeology: Viking Houses

Archaeology
Get the latest headlines from the Archaeology GuideSite. // via fulltextrssfeed.com
Viking Houses
Sep 28th 2011, 09:16

The Vikings, or as they were known outside of their Scandinavian homes, the Norse or those rotten bums, were aggressive colonizers, who murdered and raided their way across Europe and as far west as Canada--but you couldn't call them imperialists. They weren't primarily interested in acquiring land and power.

Reading Viking histories, you get the impression that the Northerners seem to have been restless, adventurous, irritable young men who left Norway and Sweden to find treasure and excitement, to explore different places, and if they could pillage and burn in the meantime, well, so much the better.

Reconstructed Viking Longhouse, St�ng, Iceland
Reconstructed Viking Longhouse, St�ng, Iceland. Photo by Thomas Ormston

But a weird thing happened after these young men arrived in their various places. They settled down. At �th Cliath in Ireland, the Norse simply parked their boat, converted it into living quarters, and eventually founded the town of Dublin. Even if their settlements weren't such a great success, like in the Eastern Settlement of Greenland where climate change and stubbornness eventually conspired against them, the descendants of the violent murderous Norse became farmers and traders and lived quiet productive lives.

More of that you can learn from studies of Viking houses:

You are receiving this email because you subscribed to this feed at blogtrottr.com.
If you no longer wish to receive these emails, you can unsubscribe from this feed, or manage all your subscriptions

Archaeology: What's Hot Now: Bog Bodies

Archaeology: What's Hot Now
These articles that had the largest increase in popularity over the last week // via fulltextrssfeed.com
Bog Bodies
Sep 28th 2011, 10:01

Definition:

The term bog bodies (or bog people) is used to refer to human burials, some likely sacrificed, placed within peat bogs of Denmark, Germany, Holland, Britain, and Ireland and naturally mummified. The highly acidic peat acts as a remarkable preservative, leaving the clothing and skin intact, and creating poignant and memorable images of people of the past.

The reason that bogs permit a high level of preservation is because they are both acidic and anaerobic (oxygen-poor). When a body is thrown into a bog, the cold water will hinder putrefaction and insect activity. Sphagnum mosses and the presence of tannin add to the preservation by having anti-bacterial properties.

The total number of bodies pulled from European bogs is unknown, partly because they were were first rediscovered in the 17th century and records are shaky. Estimates range wildly between about 200 to 700. The oldest bog body is Koelbjerg Woman, recovered from a peat bog in Denmark. the most recent dates to about 1000 AD. Most of the bodies were placed in the bogs during the European Iron Age and Roman period, between about 800 BC and AD 200.

Bog Bodies

Denmark: Grauballe Man, Tollund Man, Huldre Fen Woman, Egtved Girl, Trundholm Sun Chariot (not a body, but from a Danish bog all the same)

Germany: Kayhausen Boy

UK: Lindow Man

Ireland: Gallagh Man

Don't forget to try your hand at the Bog Body Quiz

Sources and Recommended Reading

This glossary entry is part of the Dictionary of Archaeology.

Coles, Byrony and Coles, John. 1989. People of the Wetlands: Bogs, Bodies and Lake-Dwellers. London, Thames and Hudson.

Glob, Peter Vilhelm. 2004[1965]. The Bog People: Iron-Age Man Preserved. New York Review of Books, New York.

Lynnerup, Niels 2007 Mummies. Yearbook of Physical Anthropology 50:162-190.

Sanders, Karin. 2009. Bodies in the Bog and the Archaeological Imagination. University of Chicago Press: Chicago. ISBN 13:978-0-226-73404-0 (cloth). 233 pages, plus 82 pages of notes, bibliography and index; 63 black and white photographs.

You are receiving this email because you subscribed to this feed at blogtrottr.com.
If you no longer wish to receive these emails, you can unsubscribe from this feed, or manage all your subscriptions

Archaeology: What's Hot Now: Burnum (Croatia)

Archaeology: What's Hot Now
These articles that had the largest increase in popularity over the last week // via fulltextrssfeed.com
Burnum (Croatia)
Sep 28th 2011, 10:01

Burnum is the Roman name of a settlement and fortified camp on the Krka River in the Sibenik-Knin district of central Croatia, in the hinterland across the Adriatic Sea from Italy. Burnum is called locally "Hollow Church", Å uplja Crkva), but its location on the ancient border between Liburnia and Dalmatia made it a significant military outpost between the pre-Roman and Late Roman periods.

The area was first conquered by the Roman legions during the Illyrian campaigns of the emperor Octavian, sometime between 72-32 BC. Burnum was one of five legionary fortresses established in Illyricum; the others are Tilurium, Siscia, Poetovio and Carnuntum.

A military camp was built first at Burnum during the first century, and, under Hadrian's rule, Burnum attained the status of a city. Burnum was on the Roman Road through Dalmatia. According to Tacitus, garrisons established at Burnum included XX under Augustus, quartered there briefly between battles in AD 9 and XI (AD 33-34), "not too distant to be summoned, should Italy require them"; and, under Claudius, XI Claudia pia Fidelis (AD 42-67) and IV Flavia Felix (AD 56-57).

The municipality of Burnum held a forum, town gates and an amphitheatre. Burnum remained an important center in Roman Dalmatia until it was burned and abandoned at the beginning of the Gothic-Byzantine War of AD 535-554.

Roman Buildings at Burnum

The site of Burnum (sometimes Ivoševci) has not been reoccupied since the sixth century and it is currently an agricultural field. Still extant at the site are elements of the Roman city, including evidence that the site had a square plan, a fortification ditch and a plaza/forum. Two stone arches from the basilica are still present (shown in the photo) out of the original five and a large amphitheater has been recently excavated and restored by the University of Zadar and the Museum of Drniš. An aqueduct flows underground throughout the city, some 30 kilometers in length.

Geophysical investigations, including satellite and aerial imagery, magnetometer survey, electrical resistivity and ground penetrating radar supporting topographic mapping of the Roman features. The investigations led to the discovery that there are significant remaining elements of Burnum buried beneath the surface of the site, including significant portions of the second century AD municipality. These elements include internal roads, public areas and structural complexes, perhaps military barracks and residences.

Archaeology at Burnum

Burnum was first described during the mid-1770s by the Venetian abbot Alberto Fortis. Fortis reported that the standing stone arches were what the locals referred to as the Hollow Church or Trajan's castle. Arthur Evans included a report of Burnum in his 1885 book Ancient Illyria, but did not apparently visit the site. The Austrian Archaeological Institute of Vienna excavated at the site in the early 20th century and again in the 1970s.

Since 2005, Burnum has been under investigation by the Burnum Project, an international project between at the University of Zadar, the Civic Archaeological Museum of Drniš and the Department of Archaeology of Bologna University, under the direction of the Centro Studi per l’Archeologia dell’Adriatico in Ravenna, Italy.

Sources

This glossary entry is a part of the guide to Ruins of the Roman Empire, and the Dictionary of Archaeology.

Boschi F. 2011. Geophysical Survey of the Burnum Archaeological Site, Croatia. Archaeological Prospection 18(2):117-126.

Campell DB. 2006. Roman Legionary Fortresses 27 BC-AD 378. Oxford: Osprey Publishing.

Evans A, and Destani BD. 1885 [2006]. Ancient Illyria: An archaeological exploration. London: I.B. Tauris and Co.

Popovic I. 2010. Silver jewelry of autochthonous style from south and south-east parts of roman province Dalmatia. Starinar 60:95-110.

Zunino A, Benvenuto F, Armadillo E, Bertero M, and Bozzo E. 2009. Iterative deconvolution and semiblind deconvolution methods in magnetic archaeological prospecting. Geophysics 74(4):L43-L51.

You are receiving this email because you subscribed to this feed at blogtrottr.com.
If you no longer wish to receive these emails, you can unsubscribe from this feed, or manage all your subscriptions

Archaeology: Most Popular Articles: Amelia Earhart's Fate

Archaeology: Most Popular Articles
These articles are the most popular over the last month. // via fulltextrssfeed.com
Amelia Earhart's Fate
Sep 28th 2011, 10:15

What "the Toms"â€"Willi and Gannonâ€"pointed out to Ric Gillespie back in the '80s was that to a celestial navigator, that last radio message, about flying 157-337, had a very specific meaning. A line from 157 to 337 degrees on the compass is a line perpendicular to the sunrise on the morning of July 2. It's a line that, following standard navigational practice of the day, Noonan would have laid out when he shot the sunrise with his navigational instruments and fixed their position. He then would have advanced that lineâ€"alled the "line of position" or LOP--by dead reckoning along their line of flight until he calculated that they should be within sight of Howland Island. If they couldn't see the island, then they'd simply fly up and down the line until they did see it, or got in contact with the Itasca. And if they didn’t see Howland, didn't contact the cutter? Then there was another bigger island, much more visible than Howland, a couple of hours flying time right down the LOPâ€"an uninhabited island in the Phoenix Island group, at the time called Gardner Island, now called Nikumaroro. That, the Toms proposed, was where Earhart and Noonan had wound up. Nikumaroro today is part of the Republic of Kiribati, pronounced "Kiribas". In Earhart’s day it was part of the British Crown Colony of the Gilbert and Ellice Islands.

Ric and Pat raised the several hundred thousand dollars necessary to get a team to Nikumaroro, and in 1989 we undertook our first archaeological survey. We've been back to the island five times in the last 16 years, and have done research on other islands in the vicinity as well as in Fiji, Tarawa, Funafuti, Australia, New Zealand, Great Britain, the Solomon Islands, and even--to gain comparative data from Lockheed Electra crash sites--in Idaho and Alaska. We haven’t proved the hypothesis to be correct, but we have quite a bit of evidence pointing that way. A lot of that evidence is archaeological.

Evidence From the Village

In 1938, Nikumaroro was colonized as part of the Phoenix Islands Settlement Scheme (yes, the PISS)--an effort to bleed off surplus population from the southern Gilbert Islands into economically self-sufficient coconut plantations in the mostly uninhabited Phoenix group. A village was established near the north end of the island, and in 1940 the colonial administrator, Gerald B. Gallagher, set up his headquarters there. Gallagher died and was buried on the island in 1941, but the colony lasted until 1963 when it succumbed to drought conditions.

The village is a rather ghostly place today. Through the rampant vegetation--coconut, pandanus, a really nasty shrub called Scaevola--you can still see the neat coral-slab curbs that line the dead-straight, seven-meter-wide streets, and the remains of the big flagstaff can still be seen in the middle of the graveled parade ground, next to Gallagher’s grave. Public buildings stood on concrete platforms, which today loom out of the foliage, and the ground is littered with the artifacts of daily life--cans, bottles, dishpans, a bicycle here, a sewing machine there--poking up through the rotting coconuts and palm fronds.

We didn’t plan to do archaeology in the village--an unlikely place to find a big Lockheed Electra or a couple of lost flyers--but as it’s turned out, we've done a bit of work there, and found a lot. To put it simply, the place is crazy with aircraft aluminum, most of it cut into small pieces for use in handicrafts--made into hair combs, used as inlay in woodwork. The colonists were apparently "quarrying" the aluminum somewhere and bringing it to the village. In surveys of specific house sites and in more general walkabouts, we’ve found several dozen little pieces, and a few bigger ones.

Where were they quarrying it? Some of the aluminum is from a B-24; it's got part numbers that match B-24 specifications. A B-24 crashed on Kanton Island, northeast of Nikumaroro, and there was some travel between the islands during and after the War, so the source of these pieces is easily nailed down. But much of the aluminum, especially the small, cut-up pieces, doesn't appear to be military. No serial numbers, no zinc chromate paint. And some pieces have rivets that match those in Earhart's Electra. Four pieces, all from the same part of the village, represent some kind of interior fixture that was nailed to a wooden deck. Until recently we thought they were “dados”--used along the edges of an airplane’s deck to give it a finished look and cover up control cables, but we now think they may be insulating devices, perhaps used to insulate fuel tanks from nearby heater ducts. But we still don't know where any of the apparently non-military aluminum came from.

You are receiving this email because you subscribed to this feed at blogtrottr.com.
If you no longer wish to receive these emails, you can unsubscribe from this feed, or manage all your subscriptions